Gallup poll: 53% of The Sheeple ready to vote for Frau Hillary

yeah the stupid sheeple. I think we should clone bush so he can win in 08. it will be great, we will keep screwing the poor and working people, destroy the enviroment, make the rich richer, lie constantly, invade whoever the hell we want no matter what, ruin the economy, elect supreme court nominee's for a life sentence because of their religion, etc, etc. this bush clone will wave a gun and bible around, say he's a compasionate conservative, and proceed to run the country further into the ground. man it'll be sweet.
:flamesuit on: :D
 
noone

I think we found a full on Liberal amongst us----you forgot to blame Bush for Hurricanes, Astros losing, weeds in your lawn, and I'm betting cold weather this winter is his fault too.:rolleyes:
 
53% in a nationwide poll? Ho hum. Big yawn.

Now if the socialists and other left-wing nutjobs get their wish of abolishing the Electoral College so that the residents of a few densely-populated corrupt vote-scamming leftist hellholes such as Chicago, Detroit, NYC, DC, Los Angeles, and San Francisco (and formerly New Orleans) can determine the election, then I'll start to worry.

Until that happens this is just the same old media tub-thumping trying to pump up Shrillery's image, hand-in-hand with the "Commander in Chief" propagandatainment on ABC.
 
noone said:
it will be great, we will keep screwing the poor and working people, destroy the enviroment, make the rich richer, lie constantly, invade whoever the hell we want no matter what, ruin the economy, ...
Click to expand...
Until you got to the part about the Supreme Court, I thought you were talking about New Orleans there. Easy mistake to make, of course.
 
Noone

The rich getting richer? What they're to get poorer. of course they're are suppose to make money. Its what screwed up with the laws they way they are now you're punished for being successful. Meaning you pay higher taxes for being a success. And get rewarded for being a loser. Lower taxes or tax breaks
 
noone-we will keep screwing the poor and working people, destroy the enviroment, make the rich richer, lie constantly, invade whoever the hell we want no matter what, ruin the economy, elect supreme court nominee's for a life sentence because of their religion, etc,


Where to start? The poor are screwed because they decided against education and want to rely on the government to support them. If you work hard and get an education you will get ahead in America.
Exactly what Legislation did Bush pass that is destroying our environment? You are 1 of those who complain about the environment and in the same breath cry about gas prices because they can't drill anywhere.
The rich will always get richer no matter what---due to financial advantage and education. What are you shooting for, an America where the rich get poorer?
Lie---give me a specific lie by Bush---unlike Mr. Impeached Clinton.
Invade anybody we want---who's we? Do you understand the dynamics of our government? He cannot make that decision on his own power. If you recall that we approached the UN about enforcing the sanctions only to be voted down---now we find out that we were voted down because those countries were being bribed--hence if they voted as they should, it wouldn't have been thrust upon us/ England and others to do so.
Ruin the economy? Exactly how. People have made record profits of the values of home ownership---but you don't want that either because then the rich get richer.
Finally, I can see some of your educational background based on your last comment-----The President does not ELECT Supreme Court nominees---he simply nominates a candidate and the Senate takes it from there.
 
I suspect that Hillary will indeed get the Democratic nomination. This may not be too bad for those who don't like her one will just need to find a good candidate to oppose her...:D

Seriously, I think that Giuliani would be a disaster. Somebody like McCain may be slightly better but still I'd rather support some of the southern democrats (e.g. those who voted for S397) rather than either of them. Condi would probably be good (even though I don't know how good a candidate she would be as she some times comes across as aloof) but last time I checked she didn't seem to be interested.

Personally I am not wedded to the the Republican party but Republican just happen to agree with me more often than Democrats...
 
You want disgusting??

The disdain for our neighbors and citizens displayed here is disgusting.
Click to expand...

I'll tell you what is even more disgusting - the d*p*hit moron gunowners who vote for freedom-hating Demosocialists like Clinton and Kerry.
 
wow where to begin. mvpel: nice job discriminating against people from chi, det, nyc, d.c, la, s.f., and n.o. i dont really feel like even replying to someone who would do something like that.
all the below refers to a republican white house, and republican majority house and senate.
rapier: I do not want the rich to heavily taxed, or the poor to get any unneccesary tax-breaks. where exactly did I say this? I just think it is wrong(heres just couple examples) that certain companies who may have ties to the white house should be getting no bid contracts without some questions being asked as to where our tax dollars are going. also in regards to drilling in the arctic(deals with the enviroment here). we are going to damage one of the last untouched places on earth....for what? there are an estimated 16 barrels there. the u.s. uses 7.6 billion barrels a year. so we are going to damage all that land for two years of slightly cheaper oil that we will get in 5 years maybe! so that oil companies can get rich? you dont find that a little much?
mow: the poor are screwed because they decided against education? look at the headlines today. "republicans cut several programs in budget". do you know what one of those programs was? how about more student loan subsidies. huh weird.
enviroment see above.
I am one who bitches about gas prices? where is this thread can you point it out please?
lie? give you a specific lie? how about when they paraded colin powell out in front of the senate and he told us about those roving tractor trailer biological labs? oh yeah i forgot about that.as for clinton, who the f@#$ brought him up? did i?
countries were bribed? can you hook me up with a link please? the damn liberals responsible must truly be masters of their craft to pull that one off. how many countries did they bribe exactly?
I did make a mistake in my typing about supreme court nominee's. I figured you would get the point without me typing it all out perfectly. sorry its the internet, ill try harder next time. And i really like the part where you try to put down my education. your obviously a stand up guy, and my poor government education, and community college education is second to you, for that I am sorry.
well enough ranting and poor grammer. I will never post on this part of the forum. from some of the above post its obvious you cant discuse anything. you will just twist words, or put them in my mouth. I will just use the other parts of the forum for gun related info. there was obviously no room for anyone with a dissenting opion in here.
 
If you're not prepared then you're UNPREPARED----Do some research. Her run for the Presidency has been orchestrated for YEARS. Look at EVERY poll, she WILL be the DNC choice---no question.
Put it this way jefnvk, it's alot loke the Believer vs the Non Believer-----if the Believer is wrong and there is no God, then so what------if the Non Believer is wrong and there IS a God, then you're in a world of $**t!
Click to expand...

I heard the exact same argument before the previous election.

Would it suprise me if she won the nomination? Nope. Do I think she has the nomination handed to her right now? Absolutely not.

I am simply not turning it into a 'the sky is falling' situtation, until it needs to be.
 
noone, don't worry, you're not the only liberal ... now you see whay I usually stay out of the political discussions. ;)

Frenchwrench, as for Waco, I'm sorry, Waco pales by comparison with the atrocities committed by Mao and Pol Pot. Not even close ... Try reading a little history for a change.

And I'm done ... just not worth the effort. I'd much rather talk about pointy sticks! :-)
 
noone said:
wow where to begin. mvpel: nice job discriminating against people from chi, det, nyc, d.c, la, s.f., and n.o. i dont really feel like even replying to someone who would do something like that.
Click to expand...
Nice try, but no cigar.

"Discriminating against?" Typical left whine when the manifest failures of leftist socialist Nanny-Government policies are pointed out, and the embarassing fact that these failures have been played out principally on the backs of the disadvantaged and minority populations in our corrupt Democrat-run big cities.

Did you know that some of the first gun licensing laws in this country were enacted in order to keep guns out of the hands of Black people? That it was the Democrat party which filibustered the Civil Rights Act?

Who's really "discriminating" here? The one who wants to give an equal opportunity to everyone to stand on their own two feet and make something of themselves, or the one who thinks that doing so is impossible for certain kinds of people?

The typical Democrat attitude towards guns is symptomatic of their entire worldview, and it's no accident. It stems from the philosophical difference between self-reliance vs. reliance on government.

Ask Condi Rice about that sometime. Her father and his friends defended themselves with guns against the Night Riders, some of whom were local police officers. She saw first hand the benefits of self-reliance over reliance on government, and it's one of the reasons she's a Republican leader instead of a Democrat tool.
 
donkee said:
If I remember right, didn't the polls favor kerry?
Click to expand...
The only poll that actually mattered, the one on Election Day, showed Bush winning with the largest vote total in the history of US Presidential elections, leading Kerry by 3,012,171 votes.
 
mvpel: you did discriminate in your above post. I was refering to the part hwere you said that all people from d.c., chi, ny, etc, etc, live in a "vote scamming leftist hellhole. does that clear it up?

I also believe that people should be given an equal opportunity to stand on their own two feet. where did anything to the contrary? I havent yet if you look over my posts.

I do believe that people need to make up their damn minds as to what they want the government to be. do you want a large government, with programs to help people. do you want a small government that is barely visible except for the basics like nat. security, or something in the middle. because right now(in a rebuplican controlled gov. who are supposedly about small gov.) the government is huge! yet this government in the richest country in the world, still has so much poverty ,and few social programs to help people out. while it continues to cut back on more everyday. does that really make sense to you?

and lastly my first post was just to get a rise out of all you people who think that if a dem gets elected the day get in office they will push this magic button to make all your weapons dissaprear. next thing you know a million jackbooted thugs will materialize out of thin air and kick you while your down, and steal all your freedoms. :eek:
 
noone

You need to do alot of research to find the truth and quit repeating Liberal rhetoric to cite your "facts". What was the program again that Bush enacted to hurt the environment? I didn't know that Powell saying something was a direct lie from Bush--unlike the direct quotes from Bill.
Finally, here is your proof you asked for---but I'm sure you will dismiss these facts as well:http://www.stuff.co.nz/stuff/0,2106,3459342a12,00.html
 
wtf is wrong with some of you? you keep putting words in my mouth, its getting annoying.

first off i said above that my post has to do with a republican controlled white house. this includes bush in it, also the repub majority house and senate.

what has bush and team done to hurt the enviroment? are you freaking kidding? well off the top of my head he pulled out of the kyoto treaty. and im sure this new drilling in arctic thing is going to pass also. there are other numerous examples if you would do a freaking google search.

oh we are bringing up clinton again? you guys are like a f#$%ing broken record. I have been critical of all administrations, you obviously will let bush and co. do whatever and waive your flag around.

you are saying that those companies being dirty swayed their countries to vote down the invasion of iraq? omfg. ok thats it, not that they saw it as morally wrong and no evidence for it. yeah ok.
 
If I remember right, didn't the polls favor kerry?
Click to expand...

Yes, indeed. I also seem to remember that Herman Munster was going to be our next president but then somehow Bush won. Of course Hillary is ahead in the polls, she has no clear cut competition. This means that 53% of people said: "Yeah, I guess maybe I could feasibly vote for Hillary Clinton." However 53% of people would probably say the same thing about a Republican candidate as well. as a rule of thumb, about 40% of people will always vote Republican and about 40% will always vote Democrat, its the remaining 20% that decide elections. I'm not saying Hillary isn't a threat, I'm just saying not to get too scared yet. A Republican has won the presidency in the past two elections and the Conservative majority in congress has done nothing but grow since 2000.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top