Woodguru said:
"Lipped off"? "It would have been taken further"? "No harm, no real foul."?
"Respec' mah uh-thor-itay!" I smell an OnlyOne. Or more than one.
There is no foul so foul or real as abusing Official power.
So long as the OP had control of his two guns, I see no problem. Some Office Holders seem to think folks are free to excercise their rights, so long as they do so the way the Office holder feels they should.
You have a problem with two guns? If it is not prohibited by the permit, it's none of your business if he had 2 guns. "Two is one and one is none." .... I don't remember who came up with that, but it has been repeated enough that it is a cliche' ..... yet you would justify this guy's ill treatment because of it, and if he had had a problem with it, worse treatment would have been called for? Really?
If you are an Officer, report to ChileVerde1 for your "earful".
One gun more than likely wouldn't have raised as much reaction. Had the OP refused to show ID, lipped off about his rights, and been generally uncooperative it would have been taken further. A cooperative attitude got him away with his guns, no harm no real foul.
"Lipped off"? "It would have been taken further"? "No harm, no real foul."?
"Respec' mah uh-thor-itay!" I smell an OnlyOne. Or more than one.
There is no foul so foul or real as abusing Official power.
So long as the OP had control of his two guns, I see no problem. Some Office Holders seem to think folks are free to excercise their rights, so long as they do so the way the Office holder feels they should.
You have a problem with two guns? If it is not prohibited by the permit, it's none of your business if he had 2 guns. "Two is one and one is none." .... I don't remember who came up with that, but it has been repeated enough that it is a cliche' ..... yet you would justify this guy's ill treatment because of it, and if he had had a problem with it, worse treatment would have been called for? Really?
If you are an Officer, report to ChileVerde1 for your "earful".