The kind of person who has a ccw permit and discloses that during a stop is not a measurable risk. Requiring such people to disclose and allowing them to temporarily "secure" the gun may give cops warm fuzzies, but it doesn't accomplish anything productive.
I can appreciate that cops may (irrationally) feel more comfortable by knowing whether someone is carrying and being able to confiscate the gun temporarily. Everyone feels more comfortable the more they know about someone. However, it is abusive for the legislature to pass parts of criminal laws designed to make cops feel better at the (admittedly minor) expense of citizens' rights.
The same sort of comfort argument seems to me to be a main reason why concealed carry was historically viewed as criminal, while open carry was generally okay. The thought that someone might have a concealed weapon causes many people to be nervous. By passing a law prohibiting concealed carry, those people cease to be quite so nervous even though almost all bad, violent people still carry concealed weapons.
I can appreciate that cops may (irrationally) feel more comfortable by knowing whether someone is carrying and being able to confiscate the gun temporarily. Everyone feels more comfortable the more they know about someone. However, it is abusive for the legislature to pass parts of criminal laws designed to make cops feel better at the (admittedly minor) expense of citizens' rights.
The same sort of comfort argument seems to me to be a main reason why concealed carry was historically viewed as criminal, while open carry was generally okay. The thought that someone might have a concealed weapon causes many people to be nervous. By passing a law prohibiting concealed carry, those people cease to be quite so nervous even though almost all bad, violent people still carry concealed weapons.