The sad thing is Clinton is perhaps a little more progun and much more conservative than Giuliani.
What do you think? Have you got the guts to vote for someone who represents your principles and values, regardless of party affiliation?
Jets2007 said:With that being said, we will continue to see big government continue to grow under both tickets... Hillary with grow government by creating new healthcare bureaucracies. Rudy will grow government by creating more 'national security' bureaucracies.
Say what the crowd wants to hear, get lots of facetime on TV, and then does what he wants.
Cato the Elder said:Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.
Giuliani = Feinstein
How are you educating them?
In this Feb 2000 interview on Meet the Presshttp ://www.youtube.com/watch?v=emeu2KRt2Vg
, Rudy said, "...a person who wants to possess a handgun should pass a written test, should be able to pass a physical test in the actual use of the gun, and should have to demonstrate good moral character and a reason to have the gun. That those should be...essentially there should be a uniform law passed by Congress that says that every state has to administer that...."
He went on to say, "...and I've been arguing for that since at least 1980."
Nothing but a group of Elmer Fudds willing to sell us all down the river, may they rot in hell.
Wildalaska wrote:I dont know Phil, but I do know that folks who have their locations as the "occupied Confederacy" sure as heck dont share the values of most Americans.
I don't remember the Confederacy being a bastion of freedom for some of the human beings under its domain. [...] Do we really need a Confederacy apologist discussion that ignores the core problem of the Confederacy, very conveniently? Boring.