Ruger480 wrote;
Are you buying ??
Do you guys drink?
Are you buying ??
Do you guys drink?
However, if you do wind up having to shoot an intruder, you can reasonably expect every aspect of your behavior leading up to the shooting to be fairly closely scrutinized. That may play into the reasonableness of any belief that you may have held, right before the Moment When Things Go Bang, that your life was in jeopardy.
Because not every justifiable HD shooting is cut-and-dried. Sometimes the authorities can't immediately tell whether it truly was self-defense, they might think it was negligence or worse. And if they're looking to charge you with something, the fact that you had a measurable blood alcohol content could easily influence their decision. And if it then went to trial, your blood alcohol content would almost certainly be brought up by the prosecutor, which could definitely hurt you.Skans said:If someone shoots an intruder and they've had a couple of glasses of wine (or equivalent), explain to me how alcohol would be a factor.
They can if they somehow decide it's not a clean SD shooting and they arrest you. Also, even if they don't test you, if it later goes to court the police could still testify that they smelled alcohol on your breath.Skans said:The police cannot demand a blood test or breathalizer test
I will add though that there are some times I should quit posting on forums after I've had a few.
Are you then planning to drive home? I can completely understand not carrying and drinking if it's against the law, and I also can understand not wanting to carry and drink even if it's legal. But I don't understand the decision to not carry and drink out of an attempt to be responsible, but then immediately driving afterward. If I feel I've had too many drinks to carry, then there's no way I'd ever drive a vehicle in such a condition.Marty8613 said:I do go to bars.... ones that are not properly posted, but if I drink, my Bersa is locked, using it's built in lock and in the car.
Are you then planning to drive home? I can completely understand not carrying and drinking if it's against the law, and I also can understand not wanting to carry and drink even if it's legal. But I don't understand the decision to not carry and drink out of an attempt to be responsible, but then immediately driving afterward. If I feel I've had too many drinks to carry, then there's no way I'd ever drive a vehicle in such a condition.
JimDandy said:Not all states are like WA and have the "carry" and "driving" BAC at the same level. Some states may have blowing any BAC while carrying a crime. Some states require you to inform the officer if you're carrying. All of that can add up to a nightmare of a traffic stop.
I agree, and those are all good reasons not to carry while drinking. My point was simply that it doesn't make sense from a safety standpoint to avoid carrying because you're drinking but then still drive home immediately afterward. Having a few drinks and then driving home is potentially more dangerous than having a few drinks while carrying.JimDandy said:Not all states are like WA and have the "carry" and "driving" BAC at the same level. Some states may have blowing any BAC while carrying a crime. Some states require you to inform the officer if you're carrying. All of that can add up to a nightmare of a traffic stop.
Yeah, I was saying that it's more dangerous to drink and drive than it is to drink while carrying. I'm not saying I'd ever do this, but if I was legally drunk while carrying and had a .08% BAC, I would still have enough judgement to trust myself to carry a gun. But I wouldn't trust myself to drive home; alcohol affects my driving skills far more quickly than it affects my judgement.Mike1234 said:I think he was referring to drinking and driving in general... carrying or not.