The short 'ebonics' version would be:
I did da smak down on da Dee wit da macky d Gat.
Me either.
I did da smak down on da Dee wit da macky d Gat.
Couldn't resist.
Me either.
Couldn't resist.
I guess it's not what you say, but how you say it !! ...I did da smak down on da Dee wit da macky d Gat.
Harvest makes clear with a single word that we are talking about legal hunting methods.
"With all these activities, basically these guys are stealing opportunities from legal hunters," said Langston. "As you can see sitting here in front of me, these are just an example of some of the deer killed in this county that have been illegally harvested."
LOL, no it doesn't. "Harvest" doesn't indicate one way or the other if the method of taking game is legal when referring to what a hunter has done.
As with "kill" or "take" or any other such words, "harvest" has not value relative to legality
When documented or published, it usually comes from the DNR or state conservation group. Regardless of what term is used, it is always refering to "legally taken means". I also know they track road kills and estimate what is taken by illegal means but that is a separate catagory. ....The first sentence is implicit that the deer killed were via intentional, legal means (harvest)
And that plays into the anti's who say, there's no sport in hunting anyone can do that
So all these great "hunters" are apparently "harvesters" whether they like it or not, eh?
hate that term. I never use it. It would make me feel like I'm kissing some tree hugger's a**. No more X-mas in stores. Now it's the "holidays". This politically correct crap stuff is starting to get so rediculous. "We're going to harvest a deer!" Wheeeee.