How would a SA be "as good or better than a DA"?
Refer to post #1.
How would a SA be "as good or better than a DA"?
Carrying a SA revolver in the 21st century is pure vanity
Carrying a SA revolver in the 21st century is pure vanity
It sure is not picking the best tool for the job
Expressing opinions and providing objective support for same does not constitute "intolerance for other people's preferences".What do you call intolerance for other people's preferences?
The post that was the impetus for the intolerance remark did not provide objective support. It was merely an Ad Hominin attack ("Carrying a SA revolver in the 21st century is pure vanity") and also not accurate. There can be many reasons why a person would choose to carry a single action for defense. Dismissing them as "vain" is intolerant. Note that I do not carry a Single-Action.Expressing opinions and providing objective support for same does not constitute "intolerance for other people's preferences".
Not a fan of that big hammer being unprotected by the holster. Likewise the trigger. Just looks like the hammer could be poking your side for one thing. Or possibly get snagged in something cocking it. Then the trigger being unprotected could all be adding up to a perfect storm.
There are few if any really viable reasons for choosing one for concealed carry, which was the original topic, for defense against humans, if there are other choices.There can be many reasons why a person would choose to carry a single action for defense.
I should have noted also that single action holsters are typically made to fit rather wide belts, more than one would use in common pants belt loops. Threepersons is better in that regard. 2 1/4" is standard from El Paso Saddlery but narrower on request.
Another point is that with a higher carrying holster, it is best to keep the barrel length pretty short so you don't have to lift as high to clear the holster.