It was an albatross with a remarkably awful trigger.
Yep, The civilian version especially as it is a pure afterthought when they could not get NATO to bite off on the concept. The Military version is fully automatic with a detachable shoulder stock/holster. That stock actually interfaces with the trigger, housing a portion of the trigger pack, and it is not so bad. Without the stock it horrible as it was only meant to be used as a pistol in an emergency.
Mobile One 30 weight.
I use CLP because the Army spent lots of science, time, and effort to develop a system that did not have the issue of other lubricants.
Now, they are developing a system where weapons do not have to be lubricated very much if at all.
So in a year or so, go get that Glock coated and run another 70,000 rounds thru it, LOL.
What if you never had to clean and lubricate your rifle again?
Testing so far has been limited but encouraging, the two said. A 10,000-round test of an M4A1, for example, produced zero stoppages despite testers never cleaning the gun, Foltz said. "The only time we weren't shooting was to let the barrel cool."
https://www.armytimes.com/news/your...rmy-weapon-tech-could-make-cleaning-obsolete/
The US Army’s Armament Research, Development, and Engineering Center (ARDEC) has developed an integral surface treatment for infantry small arms that could augment or supplant the existing applicated Cleaning, Lubricating, Preserving (CLP) lubricant on small arms components.
https://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2016/02/10/us-army-develops-integral-dry-lubricant-replace-clp/