TruthTellers
New member
I'm worried about that too because the term "rate increasing devices" screams ATF reviews to say semi-automatics fired too quickly is ripe for regulation on semi-auto firearms.To me, the issue isn't the bump stock, but how the forth coming regulation may be written.
I'm worried for after market triggers and such.
The term bump stock or any buttstock that uses spring pressure and forward momentum of the receiver to propel the trigger into the finger is a better way of defining bump stocks and not open to question as to what constitutes a "rate increasing device."
As many have said, a person with strong and fast reflexes could be an organic "rate increasing device" and does that mean they'd have to get their fingers serialized and registered?
As long as the phrase "rate increasing device" isn't made into law, I don't see how it could be abused in the future.