Blasphemy to many...but a welcome tool to the shed for me.

Status
Not open for further replies.
From what I have seen from the .410 in shotgun and handgun,both are easily going to drop a badguy.


If the governor with the federal '000' buck can knock a 350 pound hog on it's rear (While it was mid stride with all weight moving forward) I have no worry of it failing to do the same to a human threat.
 
Federal buck shot loads failed to penetrate 1" (20 yr old) poplar fence boards used as a target....and at a range of 15 feet. The spread was 4".

Well then I suppose if an armed carjacker is wearing 1" boards for body armor I would be in trouble! Although there are ballistic gel tests showing the 4 000 balls completely penetrating a 10" thick block of gel. Granted, a BG isn't made of ballistic genital, but he isn't made of Poplar either! Somewhere in between there is going to be a lot of bodily damage!
Also the energy of the entire load of 000 shot based on the claimed MV of 850 fps is 584 ft lbs. A very respectable amount of force at close range. Coupled with the fact that a double tap would most likely be made that's a whole bunch of 9MM sized holes oozing blood that I'm sure would stop the threat!
Again the point that seems to be missed by many. this isn't your old "first shotgun" for grouse, and rabbits. Modern handgun specific ammunition in 410 has made the 410.45 Colt handgun, as Michael Bane put it, "A very viable self defense gun"
 
Such loads are also given a boost from a longer shotgun barrel.

At 5 yards the 18.5 inch barrel of my DFG (Pump shotguns)series prints all four buckshot like a slug,group size is 3/4 inch with one round.
 
Quote:
The Governor is built on the L frame. For my medium size hands it is the perfect vehicle for the .45 ACP round. The N frame has always been a little too big for me.

Are you sure on that? I am pretty positive the Gov is a elongated N-frame revolver. An L frame would be to small to fit 6 .45 caliber holes.
according to smith it's a Z frame which has a K,L,X round butt grip frame. the cylinder frame is indeed much like a elongated N frame as the L frame is too small for a 6 shot 45 caliber cylinder.

The Governor with the federal 2-1/2 inch buckshot load knocked a 350 pound hog on it's rear haunches and kept it there.
The buckshot punched through 2 inches of thick bone (skull shot).
shot was taken at about 6-7 feet away (it wasn't a muzzle to the forehead deal)
Most any pistol round that passes the FBI protocol will easily do the same thing. How would this support your superior claim?
That being said, my Poly is the easiest to get to in a carjacking situation.
I don't care what gun a person is a fan of but claims like this are really hard for me to just let slide. How exactly is your "poly" any easier to get to than a 9mm would be in the same location?
 
@Venom1956

Well over the years I have done a number of meat kills on farm raised hogs in my day.

I've shot them with .22's (Marlin Model 60) .38 special (Models 10 and 64) and a .357 magnum (Smith&Wesson 686).

The last meat kill job done with the Governor beats what I have seen, I've seen hogs drop in place from the calibers mentioned, but I have never seen one knocked to the ground like that.
 
But in all fairness, I wonder what the holes would look like had you shot the same target with the .45 ACP or 45LC out of the Gov.

They wouldn't look like holes at all because neither round would likely penetrate! The 45 acp definitely would not, because its too slow and the 45 colt would have to be pretty hot to penetrate that. It would also have to be a FMJ round because a hollow point has a hard time penetrating such objects and most often, it cannot at all. This example is exactly what I'm talking about, a lot of people just don't know this stuff and coincidentally think that the judge/governor is a good SD option. Its not a coincidence.

Brad

You read the thread, but you didn't read it for comprehension. The statements that I made about the gun do not necessitate that I own it first. I didn't say I don't like the grip feel, I didn't say the sights are too small. etc. I debated its usefulness, which can be analyzed on a spec sheet about the gun.

I think you misread or plain didn't understand previous posts here. No one said the calibers themselves are something to sneeze at. No one said a 45 acp doesn't stop a human. The question is, what does this gun do that is an advantage over whats already out there? Other than being a snake killer, of course. We know its awesome for that.

Let me throw out a few thoughts for consideration by the arm chair analysts, by someone who actually owns one.

Armchair analysts? How about "critical thinkers"? As I said, the statements that I made do not necessitate that I own the gun, as they are completely obvious. I will stay away from statements that I would need to own the gun to prove or disprove, just like I have. You didn't really add anything of substance to the convo despite owning the gun itself, and a lot of what you said is false.

1. The Governor is built on the L frame. For my medium size hands it is the perfect vehicle for the .45 ACP round. The N frame has always been a little too big for me. The grip size (I have the Crimson Trace grips) is perfect.

Wrong. The gun cannot be a L frame because as Venom said, no L frame can have a 6 shot 45 cal capacity. L frames are medium frame. Frames are not differentiated by the grip type, you judge it by the height and width of the frame as it relates to the cylinder. The gun is actually a Z frame, and it accepts K/L frame grips. It is not a N frame because of the cylinder length. The X frame is the same idea (it takes K/N frame grips but is X frame). I am a revolver guy btw, and I think as a revolver guy, you should know that the 44/45 cal for S&W was the N aka large frame, the 38 frame is the K frame aka medium, and the I (which became the J) is the 32 cal frame aka small. That's a little revolver history for you, you're welcome.

3. While the gun looks ungainly at first view, I’ve really come to appreciate its design. The extra weight in the front seems to do a nice job of controlling muzzle rise. It’s the easiest revolver I’ve ever shot to get back on target.

If the gun is so "useful" its looks are basically meaningless. I can appreciate however the weight at the front end, and I'm sure that was purposeful from S&W.

5. The price of the Governor is very low compared to what it offers. Have you looked at the prices of a 625 lately? The Governor gives you a scandium frame, Tritium front sight, great black finish, and three caliber choices.

The 625 is a totally different concept than the governor and not a valid comparison. Lets go back to S&W history: the model 25 aka model of 1950 and 1955, was a post war 45 acp or 45 colt N frame TARGET REVOLVER. Of course, its going to be more expensive than this SD shot-volver, and of course it would be bigger and heavier. Remember that the traits of a given gun should fit what it was designed for. The same is true about the scandium frame of this gun, no target guns are made with alloy frames for the most part, because it offers no real advantage for target shooting. Some would say a light gun is a disadvantage for target shooting.

I think the 625 is a better purchase/value. It is at least great for what its designed for. The governor has the tritium sights because of its intended use, it has the finish because of its intended use, and it offers 3 cal choices because that's what people think is a great idea! No wonder why a 625 doesn't offer any of those features, because its completely different minus the caliber. Is it that hard to figure out?

6. The fit, finish and reliability are first rate. I have had no issues with any of the various loads I’ve run through it. I have yet to try the .45LC but that’s next on the list.

That's true for most S&Ws and should be an expectation when buying a new revolver from such a company. That does not separate the Governor from most any other revolver or SD gun. Even with Taurus, you should be able to expect a fine fit and finish with reliability, but many times Taurus falls short of achieving that goal.

And btw, of course the critics won't own the gun. There is no reason to "try it cause you might like it" because the criticisms as I said come from the specs, and what the gun tries to do, not from shooting it or owning it. The people who criticize it like myself will not waste their money on such an arm to see if its worthwhile. You can gauge how useful or worthwhile it is based on all of the info out there about it.

I won't be volunteering to be shot with a .410 load of buckshot regardless of the experts opinions that it won't slay a runt field mouse

Once again, first read to understand, and then post, no one said the calibers themselves are not lethal. The 410 buckshot is not a better man stopper than a well placed 38 special or any other cal (equal to or greater). The buckshot gives you more chances, but in reality, its going to be one or perhaps 2 that causes the fatality. Its not like each one is likely going to hit a lethal area.

The criticism revolves around the platform itself being inferior to most everything out there before hand. Remember, there were already 45 acp SD pistols, there were already small combat type shotguns loaded with buckshot (I know they would be much longer and bigger than the governor, but we are talking home defense anyways), and there were already 45 colt revolvers. Now this gun compared to previous 45 colt revolvers might be lighter than most, but that's about it. I don't see any other advantages to the shot-volver.
 
I don't care what gun a person is a fan of but claims like this are really hard for me to just let slide. How exactly is your "poly" any easier to get to than a 9mm would be in the same location?

On my person is something in 380ACP pocket carry, 9MM, or 40 S&W IWB, depending on dress, and where I may have to travel.

Mavracer, I think he meant the gun is more accessible while driving than a gun on his body somewhere. After he made the statement that you question, he mentioned he carries on his self either a 380, 9mm or 40. That being said, cheapshooter, do you have any idea how lethal a 380, 9mm or 40 S&W is at point blank range? You really think you need 4 buckshot balls to do the job from 18 in or less? Thats a little ridiculous to call that an "advantage".
 
Pfletch83,
I own a Judge and adsorb all kinds of abuse for my choice. I keep it in my nightstand for protection, and it should be just what I need for that distance (from my bed to the door of the bedroom). Good luck and enjoy your new toy.:)
 
Granted, a BG isn't made of ballistic genital, but he isn't made of Poplar either!

Sometimes the auto correct spell checker does funny things. : ) I'd hate to run into a bad guy that was made of ballistic genital.



I'd say if it patterns well, four .36 cal pellets at 850 fps are about the same as four shots from an 1851 Navy. It would probably work just fine if it patterns well and you can get a good hit with it.
 
federal '000' buck can knock a 350 pound hog on it's rear

You do realize that it fell on its rear because it was dead right? Not the sheer power of the round because that is impossible. No pistol round and most rifle rounds simply cannot do that. If you round had that energy it would've knocked the shooter of his feet as well. the same amount of energy is felt by the target and shooter... albeit in much different ways.

Most likely it was the last bit of information sent via its nervous system prior to death, or spasms after death, that caused it to fall in that position.

I've shot .410 buck, .410 slugs, .410 bird shot out of both shotguns and a pistol. It was underwhelming for me. But as I said to each his own. If you are happy I am happy for you. But since I do not know you I am simply giving you my opinions on some of your statements who is more accurate is up to others to decide. I just don't want you to over estimate its abilities and find yourself in a hard place.

Honestly my biggest problems with using shot for SD are as follows

You claim only effective until what 10-15 yards tops? Thirty or forty five feet? I can throw a rock further. I can hit 6" steel @ 100yds using 9mm, .38, and .45 in a SD event would I need to do this? 99.999% chance no of course not, but the gun is CAPABLE of doing it. Perhaps with .45LC or .45ACP the gov may to but that would require you unloading and reloading. On the off chance you need to engage a target further out for whatever reason your firearm cannot.

Second your firing multiple small projectiles that spread out the further they travel. you are liable for every single one. Rifled barrels + Shotshells do not = good patterns. If only 3 balls hit what happened to the rest? Where did they end up? A wall? Bystander? Car? With a gun that fires a singular round, at each pull of the trigger you should know exactly where you intend for that round to go, not rely on chance, whether it hits where you intend is another thing all together.

The gov/judge are not small guns by any means. the cylinders are almost the size of a can of soda. and carry 5 to 6 rounds. while this is acceptable amount for most snub J-frames or compact .380s for a weapon the size of these it is not. Not when you can keep the same size and weight but increase your firepower by almost 300% in some cases.

Its OAL is a huge 8.5" with only a 2.75" barrel! Keep just with S&W that's longer then the M&P Long which sports a 5" barrel and carries a whopping 17+1 rounds of the meanest 9mm HP you can stuff in there?! or if you want to compare calibers the M&P45 which is only 8" and sports 10+1 of .45ACP that's nearly double what the Gov can carry while it has a 4.5" barrel.

18 9mm HP +Ps screaming out of a 5" barrel can take the fight out out most anyone. Same goes for 11 HP .45s

I doubt you'll find a "mix of six" :rolleyes: that you can stuff in a governor that will best that.

So yes can the gov function as an SD gun. certainly. Why you would choose a governor over another weapon that's smaller over all, has more rounds, a longer barrel and in these cases quicker to reload? Makes no sense to me what so ever.
 
Venom think what you want to,it's a free country.

I have the Governor because it gives the user a firepower advantage that can be adjusted to fit the user.

I like the buckshot rounds for it because it fits within my uses,a close range threat stopper.

Hate on the Governor as much as you want,you are not going to change my mind on the subject.

I will honestly ask you to look at all the vids you can find that involve violent crimes and defensive shootings (if you haven't already) and tell me how a single projectile handgun is so much better at the distances in those cases.
 
@ Olddav

Yeah I've been catching flak for my choice in shotguns as well (Folks seem to love hating on the .410)

But without going the NFA route how many can say that they have both handgun and long gun in the same gauge?
 
A shotgun can surely dominate a handgun distance gunfight. That shotgun will be a 12 gauge pump or semi.
 
@ Nanuk

Any firearm that uses a shotgun shell can dominate at close range.

Even the .410 in long gun and revolver,granted the right load is used.
 
Pfletch83, although I'm not sure I would call it superior, I would not be the slightest bit hesitant to use the governor as a short range home defense gun. After all Bill Hickock filled up boot hill with a gun that shot one low velocity 36 cal. ball at a time. I can't see how a gun that shoots four of them with each pull of the trigger can be that bad. I'm not so sure I would like it as well for concealed carry, as I prefer a little more long range accuracy potential, but thats just me.

Winchester_73, yeah we got it about 500 posts ago, you don't like the Judge or the Governor. Unfortunately for you, a great many people don't share your opinions. So, I guess you can continue to wail hysterically and tie your guts in knot or you can get over it. It never ceases to amaze me the ends some will go to in order to try to prove the rightness. Self-righteousness claims another ignorant victim, only reasonableness can save us. Gee, I bet you don't like it so much when someone calls you ignorant. Perhaps a reasonable person would point out the problems he sees with someones choice, and then give them credit for having thought through what works for them instead of incessantly arguing on and on in an attempt to prove themselves all knowing and the only one whose opinions matter.
 
Winchester_73, yeah we got it about 500 posts ago, you don't like the Judge or the Governor. Unfortunately for you, a great many people don't share your opinions. So, I guess you can continue to wail hysterically and tie your guts in knot or you can get over it. It never ceases to amaze me the ends some will go to in order to try to prove the rightness. Self-righteousness claims another ignorant victim, only reasonableness can save us. Gee, I bet you don't like it so much when someone calls you ignorant. Perhaps a reasonable person would point out the problems he sees with someones choice, and then give them credit for having thought through what works for them instead of incessantly arguing on and on in an attempt to prove themselves all knowing and the only one whose opinions matter.

Its not that I don't like the judge/governor, I don't like the garbage said about the guns. I don't like false claims. I don't like how people are gullible enough to fall for the advertising campaign and yet think they "get it". I don't like people who can't handle criticism of their statements or claims. I don't like when people can't read or understand English.

I don't really expect everyone to agree with me for many reasons. As said, I responded to the claims surrounding the choice, not the choice itself. I'm not often called ignorant. I also didn't wail hysterically, I laid out everything so that even the most confused person could understand my points. There was little emotion involved in my posts because I know I'm not going to change those who refuse to learn or think. A long post does not mean the person has a stomach tied into knots. Maybe you, but not me. I don't need to have the popular opinion agree with me when I already know whats popular is not always right and whats right is not always popular. I'm a leader, not a sheep.

The point that ignorance blows guns out of proportion is very true, and that's my central problem with this subject. I didn't say only my opinions matter and I don't feel that way either. Many other people criticize the gun like I have, and I don't hold my opinion higher regard than theirs. I really don't hold my opinion higher than those who make false claims about the gun's superior qualities either, but I do think that logical reasoning could be better applied to this stuff.
 
@Winchester 73

Why do you say that you are a "leader and not a sheep"?

Am I a sheep in your view because I've made my choice and am sticking with it?

First off I'm not a leader,or a sheep,I am an individual and as such I am free to pick and pay for what I want.

The "leader vs sheep" line is telling of your mindset and I hope you realize it that isn't the best sort of attitude to have when dealing with others.

If you are a leader you're leading two things at the moment....Jack and spit...Jack left town about a half hour ago,you might want to catch up to him.
 
I'm a leader because I don't buy into this crap about how its a wise choice for SD. I can't say you're a sheep for sure, but many people who believe in the governor or judge are sheep IMO. How many people have mentioned the popular opinion in this thread. The popular opinion and the intelligent opinion often differ.

I should skip town like Jack? Cute. Because I can shoot down all of your reasoning, I should leave? Because anyone can counter everything you said and you have no more uninformed statements to make? Because you made a ton of ignorant statements about guns to the point where I can tell you are inexperienced, I need to leave? Maybe you should go learn what you make claims about before you make the claims? Ever think of that? Maybe know first and talk second? Make sense yet?

Its this foolishness that you post that needs to leave. Rather than debate any more, I will just quote you, which makes you look like you are very inexperienced with this subject. All of these quotes are a fallacy for one reason or another.

Which is to best allow it's owner an advantage in close quarters defensive uses.

Is that the Governor revolver when used with a good '000' buckshot load is a close range fight stopper that can/will best any .45 ACP,.40S&W,or 9x19mm handgun round.

though said revolver isn't in the same class as a pump or auto loading shotgun,but it is getting close

If the governor with the federal '000' buck can knock a 350 pound hog on it's rear (While it was mid stride with all weight moving forward) I have no worry of it failing to do the same to a human threat.

Any firearm that uses a shotgun shell can dominate at close range.

The last meat kill job done with the Governor beats what I have seen, I've seen hogs drop in place from the calibers mentioned, but I have never seen one knocked to the ground like that.

But without going the NFA route how many can say that they have both handgun and long gun in the same gauge?
 
shortwave wrote:

But in all fairness, I wonder what the holes would look like had you shot the same target with the .45 ACP or 45LC out of the Gov.

Winchester_73 wrote:

They wouldn't look like holes at all because neither round would likely penetrate!

You would most likely be wrong on both counts. If you go back to the original post(#56) that RamItOne posted with the pics of the steel target and click on the Ref at the bottom, you'll find that the .45acp WAS tested and shot into the steel target and in fact did make holes and penetrated two of the three steel plates denting the third.

Winchester_73 wrote:

This example is exactly what I'm talking about, a lot of people just don't know this stuff and coincidentally think that the judge/governor is a good SD option. Its not a coincidence.

You assumed a lot in this statement you made including what you think you know as fact versus what others may know to try and prove your point. You don't know what ballistic knowledge(or lack thereof) I may have or my thoughts on the Gov. as a SD weapon.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top