No, I'm saying that the guy hasn't done anything to imply that he is indeed a nut, other than pack what some here feel is an unfashionably large load. Like some rabid anti-gunner, a number of members on this board have chosen to judge this man's totally LEGAL actions as evidence that he's a homicide looking for a place to happen.There are nuts on both sides of the gun issue. Are you saying, that because he thinks the guy is a nut, it makes him anti-gun. Get real. There are guys out there with guns that have no business being near them and the guy referenced by the OP may very well indeed be one of them. He obviously hasn't done anything YET to get his rights taken and until he does he has every right to carry what he wishes. Doesn't mean he doesn't have issues.
I think the guy's a little strange for carrying three guns. There are probably some here who think I'm nuts for thinking I need to carry a semi-auto with 17 rounds in it. Doesn't make either of us a criminal.
What if he doesn't trust his roomates or landlord and carries the only three guns he owns every day to keep them secure? (Let me beat a few members here to it: he should just move someplace safer )What he carried 4 guns? How about 7? Criminal? No, but isn't there a point where you start to worry?
What he carried 6 handguns, 12 spare mags, a baton and pepper spray and wore a ballistic vest and kevlar helmet?
There's a line somewhere. We can avoid admitting it because it makes us uncomfortable and "sounds like" the Brady bunch, but that doesn't make it wrong.
I don't blame you. A lot of the same folks who have ten cases of AKs to "be prepared" don't keep more than a week of food or water in the house.I know folks that have many battle rifles (I'm talking cases of AK's). I asked why and they say something to the effect of being prepared (SHTF stuff). Guess I know where I'm going when the fan hits. Not really.
As do I and well said! After you've known someone for many months as a fine upstanding person that you have much in common with and could easily see yourself calling him a best friend, do you then do a 180 and think him paranoid, delusional, and in need of professional help if you find out he carries 2 primaries, a BUG, and a reload for each? Personally, I don't, and shame on you if you do.I categorically reject the notion that we can or should draw an arbitrary line defining the appropriate amount of ordnance to carry on one's person.
Stevie-Ray said:best friend...paranoid, delusional...in need of professional help
In my opinion he doesn't NEED help. And if you knew him, and his situation, you'd probably agree. If not, maybe it's you that needs help. Or a wake-up.The Tourist said:If the man is your best friend then, yes, sometimes it falls to you to get him help.
My point exactly!So many professional psychologists in this thread. And all you need for a diagnosis is a third hand account of an isolated behaviour! Amazing how far that field has come...
There's a line somewhere. We can avoid admitting it because it makes us uncomfortable and "sounds like" the Brady bunch, but that doesn't make it wrong.