Anti-gun does not = automatic Leftist.

Just kidding, Wild. You appear to be the of the more sane and level-headed contributors on these threads. I always enjoy reading your stuff.
 
I'll try to make it simple. Just who is it that "marginalizes" gun owners and categorizes them as "right-wing extremists"? Would it be fair to say that comes from the media?
Click to expand...
You're forgetting the more important question of why it happens. It's not like the media is simply making these things up or are being controlled by some secret cabal of gun haters. Anyone who believes this is the case is just another example of the paranoid conspiracy theoriest that is giving the rest of us gun owners a bad name.

Besides, with the growing popularity of talk radio, Fox News and the internet it's getting really lame to point the finger at the "socialist liberal media rawr!".


edit: I made a thread a while ago about the extreme right wing gun owners demanding the leftist gun owners compromise their values to fight against gun control...yet refusing to do the same.

http://thefiringline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=235160
 
Redworm

"It's not like the media is simply making these things up or are being controlled by some secret cabal of gun haters. Anyone who believes this is the case is just another example of the paranoid conspiracy theoriest that is giving the rest of us gun owners a bad name."
Click to expand...
The New York Times and The Washington Post are on record as being opposed to private ownership of ANY firearms. I certainly hope that this isn't new to you.
 
The New York Times and The Washington Post are on record as being opposed to private ownership of ANY firearms. I certainly hope that this isn't new to you.
Click to expand...
And? So they're not allowed to hold a certain opinion? Once again we seem to be ignoring the questions of why they feel this way and have this opinion of gun owners as right wing extremists. It's not just being pulled out of thin air.
 
I'll try to make it simple. Just who is it that "marginalizes" and "demonizes" gun owners and categorizes them as "right-wing extremists"? Would it be fair to say that comes from the media?
Click to expand...

The media may report it, but gunowners as a whole categorize themselves as right-wing extremists. See, for instance, any thread here on topics such as immigration or gay marriage.

We fail horribly at policing our own, and at reaching out to people/groups who we may not like but who might happen to share our opinion on gun control. We have made it easy to portray gun control as a left/right issue, when really supporters could be found across the political spectrum.
 
The media may report it, but gunowners as a whole categorize themselves as right-wing extremists. See, for instance, any thread here on topics such as immigration or gay marriage.
Click to expand...
Just look at General Pace's comments about gays in the military. And people wonder why the left has a hard time supporting the military when its leaders clamor about how it must remain the exclusive all boys club without any of those fruits - even the desperatly essential Arabic cryptolinguists - causing a drop in morale among uniformed bigots.

When a large number of gun owners make it a point to call a large number of left leaning folks abominations it's no wonder we lose support.
 
The media may report it, but gunowners as a whole categorize themselves as right-wing extremists. See, for instance, any thread here on topics such as immigration or gay marriage.
Click to expand...

Well said! Time to purge or marginalize and bring guns back into the mainstream.

Maybe its nostalgia, but I remember when guns werent demonized....blame the lefties for doing that? maybe in part, but I blame gun owners themselves who have allowed certain elements to represent them, elements far outside the political mainstream.

Wildpurgepurge:)Alaska
 
Well, Wild, you did it to me again. I have to agree with you. I used to be mainstream and the suckers moved the center... again. My beliefs are all over the place, according to the media.

badbob
 
Wildalaska

"Maybe its nostalgia, but I remember when guns werent demonized....blame the lefties for doing that? maybe in part, but I blame gun owners themselves..."
Click to expand...

"Demonizing" guns is a major ploy on the part of those who would rid society of the damn things. "Saturday night specials", "assault rifles", "gun culture" and like phraseology are used in attempts to make an inanimate object appear evil. Using such tactics to make ownership of certain guns, or all guns, illegal can hardly be attributed to gun owners.
 
Banning guns in the name of state security puts the state before the individual, which is technically a form of statism but is a moral cousin to socialism.
 
"Demonizing" guns is a major ploy on the part of those who would rid society of the damn things. "Saturday night specials", "assault rifles", "gun culture" and like phraseology are used in attempts to make an inanimate object appear evil. Using such tactics to make ownership of certain guns, or all guns, illegal can hardly be attributed to gun owners.
Click to expand...

True. Then again, perhaps the fact that the owners of those certain guns have no positive example to counter it with is part of the reason it's so darn effective.

Look around here. Gaybashing, thinly veiled racism, and conspiracy theories (ranging from the mildly plausible to the "black helicopter" fantastic). Spelling California with a K and juxtaposing a prominent politician's name with that of a bloodthirsty terrorist are the height of wit and rational debate for many. When all else fails we fall back on lovely catchphrases regarding our "cold, dead hands."

This is what the "mainstream" sees when they look at gunowners...at least (and especially) at those who want to own such things as "assault rifles." It's not like we're reaching out to the middle, or even the open-minded left...we're retreating into shell, talking about how much we hate everybody and how society is changing, and arming ourselves.
 
Look around here. Gaybashing, thinly veiled racism, and conspiracy theories (ranging from the mildly plausible to the "black helicopter" fantastic). Spelling California with a K and juxtaposing a prominent politician's name with that of a bloodthirsty terrorist are the height of wit and rational debate for many. When all else fails we fall back on lovely catchphrases regarding our "cold, dead hands."

This is what the "mainstream" sees when they look at gunowners...at least (and especially) at those who want to own such things as "assault rifles." It's not like we're reaching out to the middle, or even the open-minded left...we're retreating into shell, talking about how much we hate everybody and how society is changing, and arming ourselves.
Click to expand...

Bravo!

WilddownwithflourideAlaska
 
Well said! Time to purge or marginalize and bring guns back into the mainstream.
Click to expand...

Hmmm... I'll hope you'll be happy with the three remaining gun owners who are second amendment absolutists who are not extreme right wing, left wing, libertarians or communists.

"It's not like the media is simply making these things up or are being controlled by some secret cabal of gun haters. Anyone who believes this is the case is just another example of the paranoid conspiracy theoriest that is giving the rest of us gun owners a bad name."
Click to expand...

You're right, they are a very well publicized cabal of gun haters. They aren't trying to be secretive about it. Though sometimes they try to appear fair and balanced on the subject while secretly screwing us over like the CNN concrete block/body armor AK-47 switcheroo video.

I'm not talking about American representatives on my comment about far left and far right, I am talking about idealogy and policy relating to those positions.
Click to expand...

It's all well and good to look at the man behind the party, but the simple fact is that the vast majority of leftist politicians want to ban guns, and a majority of rightist politicians (barring a couple of RINOs and ones who simply disagree, out of literally hundreds or thousands of major politicians) do not want to ban guns. Exceptions on either side are just that.

If you think Hillary Clinton is center-right, that is your opinion that you'll not find shared by many inside of the United States and certain select Communist Party circles.

What the word "Democrat" means outside of the US is totally irrelevant. It's just a name, and it is in fact the right wing party in some countries, like Australia.

Let's hope that never becomes the case here eh?

In conclusion, I don't know what point you're trying to make, obviously noone believes that all leftists are anti-gun communistas. Hillary Clinton, as you mentioned, would enact several socialist policies. That may not make her a socialist, but it's a direction people opposed to socialism DO NOT want to move in.

Quote:
"the open-minded left"
That certainly qualifies as the oxymoron of the day!
Click to expand...

Yup. All of the bleeding heart liberals I know are impervious to reason. It's like trying to tell a 17th century Catholic priest about evolution, it's going against everything he's been taught since birth. Same with many in California.
 
Ah Heck. I joined this Forum to learn about firearms, training etc... Not Political Debates... although maybe those go together at times.

All I know is that it seems to be the Democrat Party that pushes gun control, its the Democrat Party that pushes gay Marriage, Higher Taxes, Pro-Abortion, Pulling out of a war that they are just as responcible for, Etc...

Ooops Is that what this is about? No... Gun control laws... Oh, yeah...
 
heatho

"All I know is that it seems to be the Democrat Party that pushes gun control, its the Democrat Party that pushes gay Marriage, Higher Taxes, Pro-Abortion....."
Click to expand...


You are just so.......so.......so........intolerant.
 
Gaybashing, thinly veiled racism, and conspiracy theories (ranging from the mildly plausible to the "black helicopter" fantastic). Spelling California with a K and juxtaposing a prominent politician's name with that of a bloodthirsty terrorist are the height of wit and rational debate for many.
Click to expand...

I know for a fact that on many leftist forums conspiracy theories suggesting that Bush really blew up the towers, a variety of different scenarios for the Shotgun Cheney incident etc. That the war was really for oil and had been planned for years along with a pipeline isn't even considered a conspiracy theory now.

Bush has been likened to Hitler HOW MANY TIMES NOW?! Many of these aren't fringe Democrats I'm talking about and I think you know it.

I'm sure your dream forum here would be 20-30 Moderepublicrats debating something for a while then finally agreeing that gay marriage and abortion should be legal.

What you have in reality on TFL is a representation of American gun owners. We are the NRA :) See how many open-minded liberals you can gather who are truly pro-2nd Amend. and form your own organization! You can call it the Wild and Juan Like Guns Association, population 2 :)

It wouldn't be like purging, it would be you splintering off. Sorry, many of us are "rural folk" and aren't ashamed of that like they are told to be by the media.

Who's to say who is wrong or right.
 
"the open-minded left"
That certainly qualifies as the oxymoron of the day!
Click to expand...
Yup. All of the bleeding heart liberals I know are impervious to reason. It's like trying to tell a 17th century Catholic priest about evolution, it's going against everything he's been taught since birth. Same with many in California.
Click to expand...
Yeah, and the right is a bastion of open-mindedness and reason.

But you're right. They won't listen. So why bother? It's not as though I'm a die-hard (even "bleeding-heart") liberal brought up believing in gun control who now firmly supports the second amendment as well as gay marriage. Such things don't exist. Like unicorns.

Hear that? That's your right to keep and bear arms slowly fading away.

You are just so.......so.......so........intolerant.
Click to expand...

On the gay marriage one yes, yes he is. Higher taxes are debatable. Abortion is debatable (though honestly I prefer not to...I'm willing if ya'll are, though...put please, only in a new thread on that one, too). But gay marriage is a bunch of people who aren't hurting anybody looking for the equal right to enter into a contract and be legally recognized same as anybody else. There are few ways to slice it that don't violate either the first, the fourteenth, or both.

There's no rational or logical way to have it both ways; either the first combined with the fourteenth lets gays marry, or the second doesn't let you own assault weapons. Choose. But heck, let's start a new thread about it so this one doesn't get locked. We'll yell at each other for a while until they closer 'er down.
 
I know for a fact that on many leftist forums conspiracy theories suggesting that Bush really blew up the towers, a variety of different scenarios for the Shotgun Cheney incident etc. That the war was really for oil and had been planned for years along with a pipeline isn't even considered a conspiracy theory now.

Bush has been likened to Hitler HOW MANY TIMES NOW?! Many of these aren't fringe Democrats I'm talking about and I think you know it.
Click to expand...

Actually, on leftist forums (or at least moderate forums) those people are considered to be whackjobs, too. So basically what I'm saying is gun enthusiasts (or at least those represented to the public) are just the right-wing equivalent of those guys. Is that a good thing?

What you have in reality on TFL is a representation of American gun owners. We are the NRA :)
Click to expand...

See above, and wonder why your gun rights are going away.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top