What a bunch of BS. Per the article he regularly carries and at the time was carrying in a holster, had he forgotten he must of realized that he was carrying when he found out why the school was in lockdown, but the police had to search him to discover he was the guy.
I don't think he is anti-gun, but what is good for the goose is good for the gander.
I don't believe he forgot.
He was released on his own recognisance without having to post bail (i.e., not a flight risk). The charges have not been dropped.That really gets my blood boiling. He gets off free of charge for committing a felony that any of us would be burned at the stake for. Furthermore, he claims ignorance of the law that he was backing.
It is POSSIBLE that the "man with a gun" report was not about him and he just got caught as they searched everyone before they could leave the building. Don't know if a description was given by whoever called in the report.I'm glad one of his friends clearly stabbed him in the back by informing the school that he was carrying. That is pretty much the only explanation for that.
So apparently, it's not a gun if you have a permit. So why would you not tell the police you had a gun if you forgot you had it and didn't know it was against the law to be carrying inside the school?Question: They asked you if you had a gun and you said no.
Answer: No police officer asked me at all, about did I have a gun with a permit, at all. No police officer asked me that at all.
The arraignment is Friday so we won't know until then.Any news or updates on this incident?
He was released on his own recognisance without having to post bail (i.e., not a flight risk). The charges have not been dropped.
Source?44 AMP said:It appears this one is already being swept under the rug...