A officer story

Frankie1449

New member
Just putting this out and see some replies . here it is we are at a family functions.a friend of the family is a police officer he was telling some stories. Well one got me he had a suspect hi on drugs he Said the guy was coming at him with a knife he put 7 9mm rounds in him and he keeps coming at him the guy stabed him3 times. And the guy still lived So my point is everyone saying 9mm for compasity if you put 7 rounds in someone and they still keep coming wouldn't you rather have a 45 cal and just use less builts to put him down.
 
...if you put 7 rounds in someone and they still keep coming wouldn't you rather have a 45 cal and just use less builts to put him down.
The current and popular belief is that he would have kept coming if it had been a .45 ACP also.
 
Back years ago the .38 spl in the Phillipines was deemed underpowered because it didn't have the knockdown power to stop warriors wrapped in burlap and wire. Well, the 9MM is just another 38. The military went to .45 ACP to take care of this problem and it did.
 
What this story tells us, whether or not it is true, is that a handgun is a poor man stopper. If our police officer put 7 rounds of quality 9 mm center mass, chances are the druggy would have stopped. Only quality hits matter. It makes no difference what service caliber is used. Hits quickly placed on target is the right answer. Use the gun that best allows you to do that. For most of us, including me, a 9 mm is the right choice, crazed druggies notwithstanding.
 
So my point is everyone saying 9mm for compasity if you put 7 rounds in someone and they still keep coming wouldn't you rather have a 45 cal and just use less builts to put him down.



Handguns are not great at killing people. We use rifles in war for a reason. If you don't hit the central nervous system, lungs, or heart/aorta that person is still in the fight. Even in the lungs they can still function. Heck look at how Platt kept fighting in the Miami shootout.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1986_FBI_Miami_shootout



Failure to stop drills exist just for the situation described in he OP.



Back years ago the .38 spl in the Phillipines was deemed underpowered because it didn't have the knockdown power to stop warriors wrapped in burlap and wire. Well, the 9MM is just another 38. The military went to .45 ACP to take care of this problem and it did.



It wasn't the 38 special, it was the 38 long colt.



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.38_Long_Colt

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/9×19mm_Parabellum



165 ft. lb. vs. 382 ft. lb.? Thanks for playing.
 
Last edited:
There are numerous documented cases of folks pretending to be bullet sponges, and soaking up numerous handgun rounds and still being able to fight. Most any handgun round is pretty ineffective at being a man stopper.
 
You guys should check out how many times rapper, 50 cent, was shot up; all with 9mm. I just don't see how being hit in the same places and same number of times with .45 ACP he'd be alive today. I suppose its possible. But hard to fathom.
 
I just don't see how being hit in the same places and same number of times with .45 ACP he'd be alive today. I suppose its possible. But hard to fathom.

It's 0.1" wider of a bullet. If 0.05" on either side of the bullet path turns a non-lethal wound into a death, that's quite something. I know folks like to argue cross-sectional area and volume of the wound channel, but unless we're talking a bleed out over many minutes, it typically has to hit one of those vital spots to end a fight. That means you need to get rounds on target and penetrate to the depth required. Any of the "standard" handgun calibers can do that. If you don't then the fight keeps going and you could be killed yourself before your attacker bleeds out.

For that matter, 45 has been used and isn't magic:
https://www.policeone.com/police-heroes/articles/6199620-Why-one-cop-carries-145-rounds-of-ammo-on-the-job/

And this officer is an excellent example of how many shots it can take. Yes his vest saved him, but despite being shot in the face, legs, and buttocks for a total of 6 times with a 45 ACP he was still able to finish the fight.
http://www.news4jax.com/news/officer-shot-6-times-shoots-kills-teenage-gunman
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ArDRg5SkuT0

I don't see how anyone can argue anything other than shot placement when it comes to handgun calibers.
 
Last edited:
Shot placement and LUCK. Really how your attacker responds is out of your hands with any concealable handgun. You better have a backup plan and the ability to implement it
 
So my point is everyone saying 9mm for compasity if you put 7 rounds in someone and they still keep coming wouldn't you rather have a 45 cal and just use less builts to put him down.
If you poke around, you can find incidents where people have been shot multiple times with virtually any pistol caliber and still not stopped.

Old Bill Dibble provides a link with one incident where an undercover officer was shot 8 times with a .45ACP and survived.

Here's another incident where it took 14 hits from a .45ACP to end a criminal attack on a police officer. The criminal continued shooting until the last couple of hits which were to the brain. That means that he absorbed 10-12 rounds of .45ACP and was still fighting when a bullet to the brain shut him down.

http://www.personaldefenseworld.com/2014/10/5-gunfighting-myths-debunked-massad-ayoob/

During that time, Gramins had fired 33 rounds from his Glock 21 pistol...and hit his opponent 14 times with 230-grain Gold Dot .45 bullets. Six of those hits were in what most of us would call “vital zones,” but the fight wasn’t over until Gramin finally had the opportunity for brain shots.​
Back years ago the .38 spl in the Phillipines was deemed underpowered because it didn't have the knockdown power to stop warriors wrapped in burlap and wire. Well, the 9MM is just another 38. The military went to .45 ACP to take care of this problem and it did.
The .38 in the Philippines was the .38 Long Colt, a black powder round that fired a 125 or 150 gr bullet at around 770-780fps. Pretty anemic compared to the 9mm--in fact, energy levels are quite a bit lower than what is available in .380ACP.

The military switched back to the .45Colt, not the .45ACP due to reports of problems with the .38 Long Colt. It wasn't until some years later the .45ACP was developed and adopted, after the Moro rebellion had ended.

Finally, the fact is that pretty much everything (except perhaps 12ga buckshot) was not as effective as desired against the Moros. Here's an incident of one Moro who soaked up thirty-two .30 caliber rifle rounds before being killed by a pistol shot that hit his brain.

http://www.morolandhistory.com/related articles/legend of .45.htm

Singly, Hassan rushed the American line with only his barong, cutting up a soldier and two officers before being brought down. "It was determined that thirty-two Krag bullets hit Hassan before a last bullet from a sergeant's revolver [an old Peacemaker] plugged him dead between the eyes."​

Cherry-picked incidents only tell us that bizarre things can happen in firefights. They don't give us a good picture of anything useful.

Here's a classic example. Garen Brenner, stopped a grizzly bear charge with two shots from a 9mm pistol firing FMJ rounds. After the bear went down, he killed it by shooting it in the head.

http://peninsulaclarion.com/stories/081902/ala_081602ala0040001.shtml

So does that cherry-picked incident tell us that 9mm FMJ is great medicine for grizzly bear charges? Hardly. It just proves that anything can happen and sometimes does.

Does the incident with the Moro who was shot 32 times with a rifle and kept on coming tell us that rifles are ineffective weapons? Not at all. It just proves that anything can happen and sometimes does.
 
Old Bill Dibble provides a link with one incident where an undercover officer was shot 8 times with a .45ACP and survived.

Not only that but they were "good" hits. Nearly every critical organ was hit.

CNS is the best guarantee you will get but; skull and spine penetration are difficult to achieve with a handgun. We had a case not too long ago where the victim was struck just above the eyebrows from 25 yards with a .45ACP round and the round did not penetrate the skull (bullets were WWB target loads). The victim had a mild concussion and spent a few days in the hospital but was otherwise fine.

The DA ended up pleading the charge down from attempting murder to misdemeanor assault.
 
It's 0.1" wider of a bullet. If 0.05" on either side of the bullet path turns a non-lethal wound into a death, that's quite something.

I guess in that respect that a 44 Special or 44 Mag is only .07" wider than a 9mm (.356).

Wonder if Sgt Alvin York knew all of this when he was using the 45 ACP for wiping out German soldiers in WWI.
 
I guess in that respect that a 44 Special or 44 Mag is only .07" wider than a 9mm (.356).

Velocity also comes into play. But is a 45 ACP moving faster than a 9mm?

Come on. Now you're comparing large bore revolver rounds to semautomatic handgun rounds? Look at the lb. ft. and tell me the jump from 9mm to 44 mag isn't a tad more than the difference between 9mm vs. 45 ACP. 44 mag can handily produce twice the energy of either of them, even up to three times the amount of energy depending on the load.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.44_Magnum
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.45_ACP
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/9%C3%9719mm_Parabellum

Wonder if Sgt Alvin York knew all of this when he was using the 45 ACP for wiping out German soldiers in WWI.

Lol, what does any of that have to do with anything? Is anyone here saying the 45 ACP is bad? I don't see that. But if you want to go that route, prove to me that York couldn't have done that with a Luger.
 
Wonder if Sgt Alvin York knew all of this when he was using the 45 ACP for wiping out German soldiers in WWI.


Strange you mention York.

York's son was killed with his own gun while fighting a suspect whom he had shot three times in the struggle while trying to make an arrest. York was shot in the head and the suspect later succumbed to his wounds as well.
 
If the .45 pistol is such a super weapon, fully capable of wiping out whole divisions with a single shot, downing squadrons of enemy bombers, and sending anything from a battleship to a submarine to the bottom instantly, why did the U.S. armed forces ever bother with planes, ships, and even the A-Bomb?

Or is all that business about the .45 Auto mostly B.S.? Say it ain't so.

Jim
 
Well, Bill Tilghman was killed by a suspect with a hideout .32.

You just have to do the best you can with what you have to do with.

But I think that if a few rounds center of mass was not adjusting the opponent's behavior, it would be time to at least try to hit him in the head.
 
There are multiple documented instances, often where the subject was on Meth, when the perp survived much longer than expected, even given multiple well placed CoM shots with non-trivial calibers.
 
Back
Top