9mm v. grizzly

[Wag]

Among other things, we know for certain that eight rounds of 9mm will kill a large bear.

A bullet that will penetrate five feet of ballistic gel is likely adequate to penetrate the thick skull of a grizzly or brown bear. I suppose the fact that it took eight rounds is notable.

Seems like I read recently that for many years, the largest bear ever killed was killed with a .22LR. Which always raises the timeless question: is caliber the most important element? The answer is a clear, "No."

So what is the most important element? That should be the real discussion.

--Wag--

 

[JJ45]

These types of threads, along with the caliber, expansion, and gel threads....
Always reveal those that have never put metal into meat.


Here is one of my favorite vintage photos, showing a tiny sliver of the real world before the advent of the internet flame wars, magazine hype, and expensive boutique bullets.

Looks like a 10/22 Sorry, maybe an M1 Carbine?

 

[American Man]

Among other things, we know for certain that eight rounds of 9mm will kill a large bear.

A bullet that will penetrate five feet of ballistic gel is likely adequate to penetrate the thick skull of a grizzly or brown bear. I suppose the fact that it took eight rounds is notable.

Seems like I read recently that for many years, the largest bear ever killed was killed with a .22LR. Which always raises the timeless question: is caliber the most important element? The answer is a clear, "No."

So what is the most important element? That should be the real discussion.

--Wag--

The most important element is to be prepared for the worst case scenario.

To me, that is the bear charging You at extremely close quarters and Not other people.

 

[T. O'Heir]

"...obtained hits with all..." That'd do it if Yogi was close enough and all 9 went into his head. Everybody gets lucky.
As I recall, .44 Mag is the minimum suggested for keeping yogi away though.
No amount of ballistic gel equals the skull of a big bear. No amount of BG equals any part of a PO'd bear. Ballistic gel supposedly mimics people, not critters.
Oh and a Buffalo Bore(who re busy using this story in their marketing) 147 grain 9mm is +P at 1100 FPS. There's a lot of conflicting data on their site.
https://www.buffalobore.com/index.php?l=product_detail&p=389

 

[OhioGuy]

So when arguing over whether 9mm is effective at stopping criminals is no longer entertaining, we can move to grizzly bears?

I have been close to a grizzly only in zoos. That's plenty for me. Those are big freaking animals.

I looked up a few articles about ammunition for hunting grizzly bears. Here's one such:

https://goneoutdoors.com/recommended-grizzly-calibers-8308851.html

Others seemed to echo the recommendations of these rifle calibers. Looking up their ballistics, all of the recommended calibers generally have muzzle energies in the 3000 ft-lb and up range.

Even the .44 magnum cartridge hovers in the 1000 - 1300 ft-lb range. And that's pretty much tops for handguns, right?

Seems arguing over which handgun cartridge to use against a grizzly bear is something like asking which size pebble you should throw at a tank.

Now, I have never hunted a grizzly, and never killed any except for with my bear hands (GET IT???). So I'm just going off of numbers on ballistic reports. But I guess I'd wonder, if someone seriously thought they could encounter a grizzly bear in the woods, whether packing any handgun would be cause for a lot of confidence. Of course, hiking with a rifle sling is inconvenient.

I dunno, then, I guess it seems 9mm (or even .40 or .45) is shockingly weak, even the popular 10mm cartridge isn't much vs. the kind of rifle recommended for taking down a bear, but carry the biggest thing you can and pray like crazy you don't actually have to defend yourself?

Pepper spray in the eyes is said to be effective against bears...although one guy in Canada told me pepper spray just gives you something to do while the bear is eating you...

 

[Black Wolf]

Those who commented negatively of this man's actions, equipment, experience, intent, mindset, etc...., tell us about the bears you've killed in self(or others)defense with whatever firearm you've used. Perhaps we all could learn a thing or two.

OK.....

I grew up in Anderson Village Alaska. I left when I was 11 and have only returned once (when I was 19).

Unfortunately, I was too young to be included on the many Moose and Black Bear hunts my Dad (rip) went on. So, first hand experience? No, once removed but personally familiar with everyone involved.

A friend (Ben) got attacked by a Brown Bear (we called them Grizzlies and we lived inland). The first "swat" it took actually ripped Ben's nose OFF. Ben Drew his 357Mag, as the bear took him to the ground. He shoved the gun out as the bear was trying to bite him. He ended up with his hand IN the bear's mouth as it was biting on his wrist/forearm. Because he carried a single action (and was having his arm chewed on), he only managed to fire off THREE rounds. This is while the bbl was practically in the bear's throat. After the THIRD shot, the bear let go and ran off. Did it die? Don't know, getting Benny to the hospital was priority. They do know, however, it didn't die THERE.

So.... Three rounds of 357mag in the bear's mouth and the bear left. Yea, add me to the folks who say 9mm ain't a great idea in bear country.

 

[Forte S+W]

David killed Goliath using a slingshot.

I've never understood it when folks use this as an example. If Goliath could be killed by any Joe Schmoe with a slingshot, then he would have never survived all of the battles he'd been in up until then. It was neither David nor his slingshot which felled Goliath that day, that victory belongs to God.

Now, if you're trying to say that God was looking out for Phil Shoemaker when he was faced by that bear, then never mind, but otherwise, using a Biblical reference of a man beating overwhelming odds by divine grace as if to say that such indicates that Goliath (or in this case, the bear) wasn't so tough after all, makes for a poor example.

Are Bears as tough as some folks online seem to think? Of course not! Judging by a lot of comments I've read in numerous bear threads, some folks honestly seem to believe that bears are some sort of mythical creature which is all but invulnerable to mortal weaponry, but Goliath actually was such a thing.

 

[TBM900]

M1 Carbine?

That it is

Of which (according to the innernets) there are literally thousands scattered about Europe, Asia, Etc, in fragments having been smashed to bits against a tree...
After its user "emptied an entire magazine" into an advancing jap, krout, etc, who wouldn't stop.
At least not until the user dropped the wimpy carbine and finally halted the attacker with single round of .45 ball.

 

[TBM900]

OK.....

I grew up in Anderson Village Alaska. I left when I was 11 and have only returned once (when I was 19).

Unfortunately, I was too young to be included on the many Moose and Black Bear hunts my Dad (rip) went on. So, first hand experience? No, once removed but personally familiar with everyone involved.

A friend (Ben) got attacked by a Brown Bear (we called them Grizzlies and we lived inland). The first "swat" it took actually ripped Ben's nose OFF. Ben Drew his 357Mag, as the bear took him to the ground. He shoved the gun out as the bear was trying to bite him. He ended up with his hand IN the bear's mouth as it was biting on his wrist/forearm. Because he carried a single action (and was having his arm chewed on), he only managed to fire off THREE rounds. This is while the bbl was practically in the bear's throat. After the THIRD shot, the bear let go and ran off. Did it die? Don't know, getting Benny to the hospital was priority. They do know, however, it didn't die THERE.

So.... Three rounds of 357mag in the bear's mouth and the bear left. Yea, add me to the folks who say 9mm ain't a great idea in bear country.

I'm going to have...... on second thought...... never mind

 

[GarandTd]

Black Wolf, you weren't one of the Nay-sayers, but I respect your 2nd hand experience. The story could be taken any number of ways. Maybe, to me, it tells me not to count on a single action revolver in bear attack. Perhaps for the man in the story the life saving decision that day was not caliber, but action. We'll never know. Maybe any survived bear attack can be explained by dumb luck. People with bigger calibers have died and folks with smaller calibers have survived. I don't know that there is any definitive proof one way or the other what the best answer is. For those that survived, whatever they had in their hand was the right tool for the job.

 

[44 AMP]

Maybe, to me, it tells me not to count on a single action revolver in bear attack.

Not so sure. Think about it, gun, hand and arm inside the bear's mouth and he still got off 3 shots and the bear let go and left.

It may not be complete 100% success, but I'd call it a success. Bear left, guy survived. That is success.

Would he have been able to get off more shots if the bear hadn't let him go? I can't say. Would a semi auto have given more than a single shot without jamming in the bear's mouth? I can't say, but it seems doubtful. Would he have been able to get off 6 instead of 3 if he had a DA revolver? I can't say. Don't know if he could say. Am not going to volunteer to test it, would you?

Among other things, we know for certain that eight rounds of 9mm will kill a large bear.

Not really. All we know is the bear was killed and 8 rounds were used.

 

[Forte S+W]

If only Ben had been carrying a .460 or .500 S&W Magnum, the mere hot gases escaping through the cylinder gap would have probably been sufficient to kill the bear.

Seriously though, sounds like he would have lost his nose, had his arm chomped on, and stopped the attack regardless, so why split hairs?
Heck, if anything it could have potentially been worse if he had been carrying something more powerful that otherwise would have killed the bear, because then he'd have the bear's heavy carcass lying directly on top of him, perhaps even with it's jaw clenched and locked shut on his arm.

 

[Pond James Pond]

Whether it's bear defence, one-shot CC calibre... I think people just have to accept there is no guarantee of success. Sure, we try to mitigate the variables with a calibre choice but even that carries compromises whose effects we cannot foresee.

It seems to me that the only times people could feel confident of a one-shot kill/incapacitation on anything seems to be from an aimed shot from a stable position. And the only time that happens regularly is hunting from a fixed position, IMO.

So, choose your gun, and take your chances.

I must say that the story covered in the OP does sound like some good shooting and some favourable conditions too. The two can't be separated.

For me, I feel comfortable with a .44Mag, but rely more on my two dogs to keep me aware and thus mu daughters safe. Luckily, bears are not common, afraid of humans and my eldest daughter is a chatterbox, so the .44 will probably stay out of sight.

Otherwise, most confidence inspiring?
.458 Socom in a full-auto receiver? Sadly a tad on the prohibited side, over here.

 

[JohnKSa]

Bears aren't bulletproof. The one in this story was killed by a veteran professional using a 9mm he had tested carefully with the loading he carried. It's tempting to assume that it was pure luck or that the obvious skill and experience of the shooter was critical to the successful outcome.

However, there are at least 3 other documented incidents where a 9mm pistol was effectively used to defend against a grizzly/brown and one other where one was effectively used against a charging black bear. I'm not going to go so far as to recommend 9mm for bear defense, but I think that we have sufficient hard evidence to dismiss the pretense that a 9mm for bear defense is a sure death sentence.

https://www.ammoland.com/2019/08/ha...r-attack-73-cases-96-effective/#axzz6BY1u1zxb

 

[Pond James Pond]

https://www.ammoland.com/2019/08/han...#axzz6BY1u1zxb

Very interesting, not to mention an excellent procrastination medium!

 

[Carl the Floor Walker]

Most of the time, I never listen to advice from the internet. I have found out that my own experience works best for me. I hunt in Black Bear Country (Swamps) and have run across many Black Bears. (they bolt like cockroaches when the light are turned on). I carry a 9mm revolver with me. But NOT for the Bears. But out of habit and for any two legged predators that I might run across.
Now If I was in Grizzly Country, Brown Bear or Polar Bear country, I would rely on my gut instincts, which right now tell me that in no way would I rely on a 9mm.
If the internet say's you can carry a 9mm, then fine, carry one. But I think I will take the next train.

 

[Metric]

How do you think .22lr would do against wolves?

 

[Black Wolf]

100% Agree - fate, God, luck, wtvr plays a huge part.

I did not know this girl but - an Eskimo girl was attacked by a polar bear. Same thing, hand ended up in the bear's mouth except..... She yanks her hand back, and her big mitten gets stuck in the Bear's throat, he died.

The point is not that a 9mm would have served Ben any less or that a 44Mag would have served him any better. The point is - when dealing with an animal known to handle abuse of that level, carry the hottest caliber you can be proficient with. If I was heading back to AK, Glock 20.

 

[American Man]

100% Agree - fate, God, luck, wtvr plays a huge part.

I did not know this girl but - an Eskimo girl was attacked by a polar bear. Same thing, hand ended up in the bear's mouth except..... She yanks her hand back, and her big mitten gets stuck in the Bear's throat, he died.

The point is not that a 9mm would have served Ben any less or that a 44Mag would have served him any better. The point is - when dealing with an animal known to handle abuse of that level, carry the hottest caliber you can be proficient with. If I was heading back to AK, Glock 20.

I see a couple of your examples and it is amazing that those 2 survived. Luck was definitely on their side as well. I love my SA, but I think it is not the greatest choice for exactly the reason he could not empty his revolver in the bear's mouth quickly... but being in the bears mouth might account for the revolver not flying off in a different direction... whether it be SA or DA.

I'm one of the people that is not pleased at all with the guide's decision to go with a 9mm, but I would not say I am a nay sayer, the term you used in a previous post. That situation just happened to work out for him that day. No disputing that. I am just disgusted that this person would risk the lives of others involved, cause of what the real truth probably is, is that he didn't feel like carrying a heavier firearm or some other excuse that caused him to be complacent that day. I spend time in AK and I don't know anyone that carries a 9mm by a river or anywhere outdoors for that matter.

Then some people want to tout this guy's resume like he is the God of Guides as if he knew the outcome that morning as he was putting his boots on. Then some people think some opinion of others shows who has or hasn't put metal to meat as if that has anything to do with anything.

This is all about decision making to me. If he wants to carry a 9mm when he's by himself and thinks he's going to get off 8 rounds per bear encounter, then fine... he can be all he can be, but he shouldn't put other people's lives at risk cause he feels like being the minimalist that day in coastal brown bear country.

If we're talking about a cop who left his 40 at home that day for whatever reason and took his 22/45 and ended having to shoot someone that resolved the situation, are we going to be talking about what a hero this cop is? He did a great job, so is that the end of the conversation?

I say regardless of a positive outcome, there's no excuse to risk other people's lives like that. He figured he would have less problems with the males than the sows with cubs... there is just so much wrong with his logic.

 

[Don Fischer]

Gonna read about the handgun cartridge's later. I have a theory about using handgun' to protect against dangerous animals. Rifle's work better! Problem with me would be shooting the heavier handgun's like 44 mag because of the recoil. Friend in Montana years ago had a mod 29 I'd shot a few times and I absolutely hated the thing for all the recoil. had a 4 mag back then and it wasn't a lot better and don't even like the 357 mag! I wonder how many people that carry handguns for protection are really good enough with them t stop a charge? If I were up there or around dangerous game I'd carry my 32 long with cast bullet's for rabbits and a rifle for protection. Story about a guy shoving the gun in the bears mouth, to kill anything the way you have to either hit the brain or the spine. Seem's the guy hit neither! Stopping a dangerous animal seem's no different to me than killing a deer, shot placement means a lot! I lived in Alaska about two years and used to go up Portage River fishing a bit. Lot of bears up there but we never saw one. For protection I always carried my 308 with 200gr handloads. Had a lot of faith init but also glad I never had to prove it!