A couple of years experience hardly makes them experts. Imo, any game that proves 9mm smokes .357 must be played with loaded dice.
You have their test results, and can form your own opinion...
Sorry, but not seeing them being experts from that. Draw your own conclusions. But I can say, shooting a 9mm revolver (an Airweight, for my example) is not something most people do. I’ve heard people say .38+P is too much, and sometimes that 9mm is terrible. Never hear people say .357 Magnum is easy to shoot. Haven’t had any issues with my 9mm revolver. Ballistics are definitely important... being able to shoot it is likely just as important, for obvious reasons.
That being said, I’ve been up in Maine since Saturday. All that time, I’ve been carrying my 642-1, converted to 9mm. Hornady 147 grain XTP... very happy with the load, and works better than the .38+P I original used. Tip, Hornady crimps are awesome for 9mm revolvers. Shot like four cylinders to test one round, and no movement at all.
In regards to the revolver, I removed it once; mailed a package from the Post Office. Comfortable, and easily carrying 20 rounds of 9mm on me (full gun, three moonclips in weak side pocket).
Since it usually comes up on how my gun is going to blow up in my hands... I bought an older M&P up here (1920ish production), as I have a FFL-03. I downloaded the Supica/Nahas book on S&W firearms... mainly to have a source of info after trying to scramble to figure out what I was looking at with the revolver I was purchasing. Has a good deal of info on the 1917, which I’ll likely be buying after I get situated up in Maine... but I bring it up for this little blurb about the 942.
Heard the story a few times, but seeing the revolver pictured and authored information... I feel is a bit more interesting. My gun is identical to that prototype... just no porting and coated in NP3 Plus.