Is that a typo? I would think the bullets alone would cost in excess of $60/1000, and the cheapest primers I've found are $19/1k..40 fan here. I've had several guns over the years that were identical other than caliber. Mostly 9mm /.40 I have always been able to shoot the .40s more accurately and I stuck with them. I also reload so cost difference is negligible, about $20 or so per 1k.
Is that a typo?
what is needed to convert glock 20 gen 4 into a .40?
Is that a typo? I would think the bullets alone would cost in excess of $60/1000, and the cheapest primers I've found are $19/1k..
Can you list your components, where you buy them, and in what quantities, please?
I was referring to the cost difference between 9 and 40 when reloading and buying in bulk.
saleen322 said:It is not a matter of dislike, the 40 is a solution in search of a problem. It is smaller than a 45 and does not have the capacity of a 9mm in the same size nor the power of the 10mm. It is still common and available in most all common pistols so if someone likes it, they can get one. There are so many 40s out there now, I don't see it going away and it will continue to be offered in new pistols if someone wants one.
Except for pressure, which is usually linked to the "snappiness" most people dislike about the round.Almost everything about 40s&w is in between the 2 calibers
Except for pressure, which is usually linked to the "snappiness" most people dislike about the round.