Malcolm Reynolds
New member
P.S.
Calling the .38 "weak" or "anemic" is ridiculous. Come on, people.
Calling the .38 "weak" or "anemic" is ridiculous. Come on, people.
I'd have no problem with shooting .38 out the longer barreled revolver. I just think the extra weight will reduce recoil. One shot stops are too rare to rely on.Calling the .38 "weak" or "anemic" is ridiculous. Come on, people.
Yep, I don't think I disagreed with anything you said. It just always seems to boil down to "one is awesome and the other is puny" to some people. You didn't strike me as saying that, though.
And then they changed to other cartridges that are much better.Every cop in the country was armed with a .38 special for about 30 years.
An aquaintance of mine (Deputy Sheriff) shot a guy 5 times in the chest with a 38 just before the guy nearly beat him to death.An acquaintance of mine shot a home invader once in the chest with a standard pressure. 38spl from a 2" mod 36. The invader turned and dropped dead on the spot. Hardly even bled.
It's capable, just not my first choice.
The US Army also once used the 38 Special, until they realized it didn't work that well
An aquaintance of mine (Deputy Sheriff) shot a guy 5 times in the chest with a 38 just before the guy nearly beat him to death.
One lucky shot doesn't prove it's a good choice when there are better options
From reading the comments it seems the general concensus that the .357 magnum is going to be much more effective at stopping the threat, and the .38 special is pretty weak. Am I about right? I know loudness can be a problem but frankly if the .38 special isn't going to stop the threat than I would rather have the stopping power of the magnum round instead.