.357 lever vs .223 semiauto for defense?

Status
Not open for further replies.
S

Sriracha

New member
Hi all,

I'm contemplating a .357 lever action or .223 semiauto for relatively inexpensive plinking and as an all-around, handy gun. However, I may as well get a gun that can serve at least part-time duty for self defense. Which do you think is better for this role?

I'm mainly thinking of something like an 1894-style lever action .357 carbine vs. a Mini-14 or AR-pattern carbine. Let's assume that in my living situation, over-penetration is not the most important issue. Also assume I am trying to defend myself at the length of a residential hallway.

The .357 makes a bigger hole, but the .223 autoloader may allow quicker shooting.

Have you all any views to offer?

(I suspect many of you will sensibly recommend the 12-ga pump shotgun, but I want something that a recoil-sensitive person will also enjoy shooting.)

- Sriracha
 
i would favor the lever action if you have any revolvers chambered for that round. Also might be able to plink with 38 special, don't quote me on that though.

I don't like semi autos in general because they spit casings everywhere, but i suppose the lever action will to an extent as well.

I would say the lever action has the advantage for reliability, and you probably won't get as many dirty looks if you are seen with one as opposed to an AR.
 
I have a Henry Big Boy in .357 and absolutely love it. I bought it in .357 mag (vs .44 mag) because I also have a 1984 Colt Trooper Mk V revolver in .357 mag. The Henry has the smoothest lever action of any others I have handled. Simply a great rifle.
 
My SHTF gun is a Marlin 1894C in .357 Magnum. It hold 9+1 rounds of .357 or 10+1 rounds of .38-44's or .38 Specials, and can be topped-off without taking it offline. And it looks less "evil" than an AK/AR. It's very cheap to reload for.

For TEOTWAWKI, I have a Garand M1 and lots of loaded clips, but I'm also planning to get a .22 rifle soon.
 
Either one would probably work for you.

With the .357 though, you can use .38 specials and carry one or two more rounds in the magazine too.
I would get the 1892 action instead of the 1894 since the 1892 was specifically designed for pistol cartridges.

Another benefit is that the .357 gains a lot of velocity due to the longer barrel. The .38 special also benefits from the longer barrel too.
Ammo that is very uncomfortable to shoot out of a handgun is quite manageable in the carbine.

Bullet shape is a consideration though. My 1892 carbine stutters on the sharp edged SWC designs, but is flawless with JHP or RMFP designs. I would not hesitate to use it.
 
For defense, I'd go with the .357 levergun. IMHO it also gets the nod for versatility, reliability, general fun factor, and low profile. The .357 is a pretty decent round even in a handgun; in a rifle, it's a whole other beast, and in a good way.
 
I have 2 357 rifles, a Browning B92 and a Interarms (Rossi) M92 w/16" barrel, and they are both great guns. My youngest took a nice sized doe at about 40 yds. with the Interarms M92. She ran 5 to 10 yards and went down and never got up.

In the worst case scenario they make good SHTF guns, along with companion handguns.
 
In expensive plinking???

Its gonna be awful hard to find a cheaper plinking rifle the the 38/357. With cast bullets I can shoot them dern near as cheap as 22s.

I do a lot of 223 shooting but its more work, (I'm a target shooter). But for fun I cant beat my little Marlin 1894 Cowboy. Unless its my old Remington pump action in 25-20.
 
Look guys, I really like lever guns, I even have two, ,one a 30/30 and the other a .44 magnum, but I'd get a M4 style AR if I had the money.

As long as where you are at you can own that AR, then I'd get it over any lever gun. Fact is the 5.56 delivers as much, if not more, power than the .357 Lever gun does at muzzle, and at any other range it delivers MORE!

The good make AR will be more accurate, flatter shooting, harder hitting, hold more ammo, faster to reload, and actually run for far longer before a malfuction than a lever gun. Not to mention it will be easier to clean.

And yes, I know well about Buffalo Bore .357 ammo, I post about that stuff here often.

And hey, can you get a pig sticker on the end of your levergun?
 
.357 is a lot of fun to shoot out of a rifle and subsonic .38 special loads are nearly .22 rimfire quiet. Some Marlins will occasionally jam because more than one cartiage is trying to enter the cartriage elevator, when that happens, about the only thing you can do is unscrew the lever and clear everything. Not something you can clear real quickly like a jam in a semi-auto.
 
Seems like the .223 would be a bit much for SD. Any round not dead on the intended target could end up in the neighbor's bedroom.

Roach
 
Seems like the .223 would be a bit much for SD. Any round not dead on the intended target could end up in the neighbor's bedroom.
Click to expand...

No. Fragiable .223 ammo, like 50 gr soft points, penitrate very few walls of a house. The slugs fragmentate on the sheet rock and wood. In fact, 5.56 ammo penitrates less than 9mm JHPs!

The only downside is the blast from a 5.56. But then, full .357s have a fair amount of blast to, as does 12 guage shotguns.
 
Either of these fine choices would be trumpted by the obvious KING .....

A 12 ga. shot gun

The lever gun is no slouch ....... I own a 94 Marlin in .357 ..... and yes, .38's work well ........

And I own a couple of AR's ........

Per hit ...... a good JHP like the Remington 125 would do wonders ..... over an AR .....

If you were barracaded away from more ammo ........... an AR with at least a 20 round mag full would certainly hold up longer than the Lever with it's 8-10 rounds .........

The pointability of a gun often gets over looked ......... ergonomically .... an AR is just about tops if you work with it ........

The lever gun is good and if you don't train much ...... it would win on being most instinctive over the AR ..........

My choice is none of the above .......... make mine a 4" 629 Mountain Gun (.44 mag) ........

....... with this I fight my way (twelve feet distant) to a large stash of long guns (rifled and smooth bore) and pick the one that best suits the particular problem at hand.


Three 44s
 
Last edited:
.357 or .223 for HD. IMO overkill for events that take place at 12 ft. or less. This is what pistols were made for.

My choice, S&W 9mm, 13 rds. of HydroShoks or Black Talons, double tap. Should be no problems, plenty left if there is + backup clip, another 12 rds.

I bought this pistol back when the military was going away from the 1911. The grip on the Beretta was too small, can't remember what was wrong with the Colt. The S&W fit like a glove and the 9mm is very controllable (accurate).
 
.357 or .223 for HD. IMO overkill for events that take place at 12 ft. or less. This is what pistols were made for.
Click to expand...

That's silly. Handguns were made for situations in which carrying a long gun would be impractical. And either caliber is hardly overkill - lots of people disparage anything less than .308.

As far as .357 vs. .223: Get whichever you like better. As long as you practice with it, it'll serve admirably.

If you're interested in which is SUPERIOR FOR SD, specifically, ponder the staggering number of police depts. and military agencies which currently issue lever guns.

A lever gun will work. A SxS shotgun will work. A flintlock, for that matter, will work. But state of the art is a semi-auto carbine. (OK, maybe full-auto is state of the art. But we can't make the guy spend $10,000.;))
 
I'd vote for the AR simply as you should be able to buy one now, no telling what next year may bring. :( While the Mini-14 is cheaper short term, getting good magazines is 3X expensive as AR magazines. Evens out pretty quick when you figure that you can completely rebuild an AR yourself while a Mini-14 requires you to send back to Ruger for service.

A good (Marlin) lever gun should be available as long as there are firearms. :)
 
"...part-time duty for self defense..." Any rifle will do that. How well you can shoot it, when heavily stressed, is the important part. How fast isn't as big a deal if you make the first shot count.
 
A vote for the lever gun

For several practical reasons. First, and foremost, it will do the job. Civilian self defense is a completely different situation than combat, or even most police work. Large magazine capacity semi autos are popular, especially when using your own gun for covering fire. For home defense, I don't see this as a significant issue.

You are highly unlikely to need to "fire and maneuver" in a home defense situation. Also, you are not likely to need to "recon by fire", leaving aside the legality of the tactic, this is something the semiauto military style rifles shine at, and the lever gun doesn't, by modern standards.

Forget Hollywood fantasy, holding off hordes of zombies, or whatever. As a civilian, you can only shoot when you have a clear target, and a clear need to do so, legally. Hi-cap semis encourage spray and pray, the manual repeater is not so bad in this regard.

The .223 is a high intensity round, a varmint round deigned by the powers that be as suitable for our enemies on the field of combat, and used by police, mostly because the military uses it, and they can get guns and ammo at reduced costs. Firing a shoirt barrel .223 inside a hallway without hearing protection is something you do not want to experience, if you have any other option. The guns are "cutting edge" but more "traditional" designs will still perform quite well. Also to be considered is the politcal dimension. ARs (and others) are on the top of the anti-gunners hit list. Everybody says "get one now, while you can", and it is not a bad idea, but consider how they might be banned from private hands, while the lever gun will not be, at least for a much longer period of time.

Cost is another factor. The GI style semis cost close to double what a lever gun like the marlin does. AND, if you ever do wind up in court due to justified use of the gun, the AR will have a serious PR disadvantage.

The .357 is considered a fine defense round from a handgun, and its performance from an 18" carbine is even better. While lacking the easy flat shooting range of the .223, for personal defense, 200yard shooting is not an issue. The carbine has light recoil, and a lower muzzle report than the high intensity .223, something worth considering in your hallway shooting situation. Being blinded and deafened by the first round seriously degrades your ability to deliver an accurate second or third round.

ARs are cool, they are visually striking, they are the gun everybody thinks they need to have. Your needs can be met by either, I would go with the lever gun, just my personal choice. And I do have a Marlin 1894 in .357, as well as a Mini-14, and I have owned ARs. My personal house defense long gun is a chinese coach gun, in 12ga.
 
Which one are you better with? If you shoot both well, then which one are you more likely to train and practice with? Because the training is going to be much more important than choice of firearm here. Personally, I think the 5.56 semi-auto carbine is a better choice; but for the type of scenario you are describing, training is much more important than gear though that subject is less often discussed on gunboards.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top