I have a few 32-20's and I like em other wise I would not have them.
BUT.. Its not reinventing the wheel.
The one thing I dont like about the 32-20 is the fact that there are soo many different fire arms that have different loading characteristics.
I.E. My smith and Wesson hand eject from the 1800's cant be loaded with the same loads I load for my Savage model 23 in 32-20
Even though both use the exact same caliber shooting my rifle loads from the Smith can result in a over pressure condition that can damage the gun or ME.
So I have to be very very careful to segregate the rounds so that a mistake can not be made.
No issue with that at all with the 327. Any load for my Rifle can be shot out of any of my 327 hand guns.
The 30 carbine is a fine caliber but it does not offer anywhere near the loading options the 327 magnum has. The 30 carbine has one maybe two bullet options were as the 327 magnum you can shoot literally 100's of different combinations. You can load it light and soft to heavy and hard hitting and every were in between. Just way more versatile.
So the correct comparison is. Why would you not want the one in the middle. When it can do every thing the one on the left does and everything the one on the right does and everything in the middle that ether one can not do.
But owning a 327 magnum does not preclude any one from owning a 30 carbine or a 32-20.
I will have them all. He who dies with the most calibers wins!!
And if your a 32 guy like me. Ya got to have them all anyway, so might as well get after it.
Also in my view the 7.62 Tokerev is a semi auto version of the 327 magnum.
So you have to have that one too.