10mm Bug

The OP mentions reloading is his future, so the 10mm can quickly become economical to shoot.
Mild to wild, it is a very versatile cartridge.
Most of my 10mm experience is with a Glock, a Delta elite and a DW bruin. I can load 180 gr at 800 fps for range work, and step up to 180 gr at 1200 fps if needed.
Its a heck of a cartridge to work with.
 
And if you're shooting 40 level ammo...what's 9mm HST not doing for you? 124gr +P HST go the same distance and expand the same amount as 180gr HST. I mean, exact same. (luckygunner) I own boxes of the 147gr +P but haven't seen 9mm 147 +P HST, but that out performed all 40 cal rounds at luckygunner. All of them. Greater expansion and depth.


:)


Sure the 10mm levels are across a larger spectrum...but that only matters if shooting the nuclear round matters...if not, you're giving up a lot to shoot 40 level rounds (size). At least with a 357 revolver you get the fun of a revolver.
 
Last edited:
My son lives and works in the Kalispell region of Montana. He's an outdoor guy and takes full advantage of every season in the Rocky Mountains. I brought him up with 1911s so when the time came to get a pistol to carry around the mountains he got a RIA single stack 10mm. A few years passed and he bought a Springfield 5.25" XDm 10mm. I've shot both of these pistols and my choice would be the XDm. It feels very much like a 1911 but carries a lot more rounds (15 +1) and has a trigger that is light years ahead of Glock.

He uses Buffalo Bore 220gr hard cast, flat nose rounds with a muzzle velocity of 1,200 fps and over 700 ft lbs of energy. Not a .44 Mag but plenty of oomph to easily penetrate the skull of Mr. Grizz.

YR0Xihl.gif
 
Last edited:
retired

My G20 has pretty much retired all my magnum revolvers from hiking and woods carry, due to its compactness and comparatively light weight. My Glock(s) are incredibly durable, shrugging off hard use and even a bit of neglect, and mine are very reliable function wise as well.

My GP load drives a 180 gr truncated FMJ at around 1100 fps, what I consider 40 S&W +P velocities. For serious carry, I use the W-W 175 Silvertip if I can find them, and I am hearing good stuff regards SIG JHP ammo as well. I do not find the 10mm Auto that difficult a cartridge to shoot, and equate recoil to just a bit over what the .45 Auto delivers.
 
rock185 said:
Thoughts/inputs: I admit to being a fan of the 10MM since it was introduced, and began loading for it soon as dies were available. Beginning with a Bren Ten, I've had a succession of 10s,i.e., S&W semi-autos, Colt Delta, Kimber and Glock autos, and S&W and Ruger revolvers. The S&W 10s; 1006s, 1026s, 1076s, became my favorites. The uber reliable S&Ws handle any and all 10MM ammo I've used, without any issues with durability, without need of heavy or dual recoil springs, buffers, etc. l I have no experience with compact 10MM guns, the 10MM XD, or double stack 1911 type 10s. While I'm a long time SIG owner, I never got around to buying SIG in 10MM either...

Having owned and loaded for .41 Mag, .44 Mag, and .454 Casull, I'm fully aware the 10MM ballistics do not equal any of the big Magnum revolvers. IMHO, 10MM ballistics are more comparable to .357 Mag. than the others mentioned. But in a service sized semi-auto pistol, I believe the 10 is quite practical. A factory load I've used, the Buffalo Bore 180 grain, IMHO demonstrates ballistics near the top of what the 10MM might be safely loaded to. In a 5" semi-auto the BB 180 averaged 1380 FPS. FWIW, my S&W 5" 610 revolvers routinely produced velocities higher than the same loads in the autos. I didn't have the opportunity to test the BB 180 in the revolver, but the results might have been interesting. Not equal to the big Magnum revolvers, but I wouldn't expect it to be.
Click to expand...
I looked online for used Smith's yesterday. Nada.
 
Forte S+W said:
Yeah, but your wallet sure can.

So if all he's going to shoot is .40 spec 10mm FBI loads, then it's substantially cheaper to just buy a cheap police trade-in .40 than buy a new 10mm then have to pay for overpriced 10mm FBI ammo.

Also, he mentioned right in the first sentence that he began looking into the 10mm seeking a hiking sidearm for his son, ergo I assume that at least part of his attraction to 10mm lies in its utility as a viable platform for Wilderness Defense, and obviously for that role he's going to want full-power ammunition, not reduced power loads designed specifically for combat with bipedal predators.
Click to expand...
Affirm. I have Glock 22. I would be looking at loading hotter loads with a 220-230 grain cast bullet for backwoods.
 
Steve in Allentown said:
My son lives and works in the Kalispell region of Montana. He's an outdoor guy and takes full advantage of every season in the Rocky Mountains. I brought him up with 1911s so when the time came to get a pistol to carry around the mountains he got a RIA single stack 10mm. A few years passed and he bought a Springfield 5.25" XDm 10mm. I've shot both of these pistols and my choice would be the XDm. It feels very much like a 1911 but carries a lot more rounds (15 +1) and has a trigger that is light years ahead of Glock.

He uses Buffalo Bore 220gr hard cast, flat nose rounds with a muzzle velocity of 1,200 fps and over 700 ft lbs of energy. Not a .44 Mag but plenty of oomph to easily penetrate the skull of Mr. Grizz.
Click to expand...
Good input. Thanks. I own an XD in 9mm. It is my carry gun and I shoot it better than most of my other handguns.
 
While I shot M&Ps for years, I am not a fan of the M&P/XD striker fired design, especially for heavier recoiling rounds. Both pistols cock the striker to an energy level that is sufficient to ignite primers in the normal condition. The Glock, and other striker fired designs do not. In addition, the sears on both the M&P and XD relies on a few degrees of angle and both wear at a rate that requires replacement well before other designs, often in the 25K range, sooner for the heavier recoiling rounds.

Yes, for the M&P and XD to fire due to a sear failure requires the striker safety to have been bypassed or fail as well. I have inspected a lot of these two brands where they either had dead triggers (sear worn and fails to hold striker when cocked) or fired upon cocking (same, but striker safety did not function as intended). A few fired in holsters and a few in the users hand, when their finger was not on the trigger. I still have one M&P9 and I replace my sear every 20K. On first sear, I started to get dead triggers at about 27K. On the second one, it started to double with my finger on the trigger at about 24K. On it's 4th sear at about 75K now.

While I doubt there are many people have a 10mm XD to 20K rounds, it is something to be aware of in a maintenance schedule if that is what you choose.
 
Great write up, rock185. Any experience with the SR1911-10? Preference on Ruger or S&W 10mm revolver?

rock185 said:
Thoughts/inputs: I admit to being a fan of the 10MM since it was introduced, and began loading for it soon as dies were available. Beginning with a Bren Ten, I've had a succession of 10s,i.e., S&W semi-autos, Colt Delta, Kimber and Glock autos, and S&W and Ruger revolvers. The S&W 10s; 1006s, 1026s, 1076s, became my favorites. The uber reliable S&Ws handle any and all 10MM ammo I've used, without any issues with durability, without need of heavy or dual recoil springs, buffers, etc. l I have no experience with compact 10MM guns, the 10MM XD, or double stack 1911 type 10s. While I'm a long time SIG owner, I never got around to buying SIG in 10MM either...

Having owned and loaded for .41 Mag, .44 Mag, and .454 Casull, I'm fully aware the 10MM ballistics do not equal any of the big Magnum revolvers. IMHO, 10MM ballistics are more comparable to .357 Mag. than the others mentioned. But in a service sized semi-auto pistol, I believe the 10 is quite practical. A factory load I've used, the Buffalo Bore 180 grain, IMHO demonstrates ballistics near the top of what the 10MM might be safely loaded to. In a 5" semi-auto the BB 180 averaged 1380 FPS. FWIW, my S&W 5" 610 revolvers routinely produced velocities higher than the same loads in the autos. I didn't have the opportunity to test the BB 180 in the revolver, but the results might have been interesting. Not equal to the big Magnum revolvers, but I wouldn't expect it to be.
Click to expand...
 
I have a Kimber 1911 in 10mm. I like the gun but don't really shoot it that much. My buddy got the bug for a 10mm and bought a compact Glock. Then he bought an extended barrel for more velocity. Then he bought some buffalo bore ammo with the flat meplat. The most powerful 10mm for bear protection. Then he found that ammo didn't feed well in the glock. Then he got over his love affair with the 10mm and he got rid of it. A reliable double action 357 mag is a much better choice for bear protection than 10mm. He likes his GP100 357 now. Nothing wrong with 10mm. If you want to buy one and reload for it you'll enjoy it. Just don't expect it to be a magic bolt of lightning or Thors Hammer. A good 357 mag revolver is a much more versatile and reliable handgun when a 44 is just too big and heavy to carry all day. I've had some issues with hot handloads locking my Kimber back prematurely. It runs fine on the watered down factory stuff and soft handloads. If I had to choose one general purpose, do it all handgun, it would likely be a good 357 magnum.
 
MarkCO said:
. . . I am not a fan of the M&P/XD striker fired design . . .

. . . the sears on both the M&P and XD relies on a few degrees of angle and both wear at a rate that requires replacement well before other designs
Click to expand...
This is something I was completely unaware of. I may not have read closely enough but is this true of Glocks or other striker fired pistols also?
 
10mm bug....just like pringles. Once you pop, you can’t stop.

There’s no wrong answer when it comes to 10mm.
 
Steve, most are close copies of the Glock design. Glocks have about half of the (total) energy in the "partially" cocked configuration as opposed to about 95% of the (total) energy in the M&P and XD. That is why the M&P and XD have slightly better triggers than Glocks. You are not using the trigger to put 50% more energy into the striker spring, only 5%.

But the Glock system is much more durable. Due to the geometry, it can endure significant wear, long term, and the striker still won't be able to slip off of the rear of the trigger bar. The M&P and XD utilize a trigger bar and a separate sear that can move independent of the trigger bar. That is one of the major differences between the M&P style striker fired pistols and the Glock style striker fired pistols.

When I consult for LEAs on their pistol selections, this is an item we discuss as far as a wear/maintenance item.
 
10mm Bug
Click to expand...
Damn thing bites hard. :(

Then you're infected with The Obsession. :eek:

My son lives on CO and has been looking for a sidearm for hiking, both in CO and other states. He has been set on a S&W 44 magnum. I did some research and the next thing I know I am led to watching 10mm videos. Bad news is, now I want one. Also want to start reloading (ammo run will do that to you).
So, watching videos, I am liking the Glock 40 and the RIA double stack 1911. This will be a future purchase, if there is a future after all of the craziness going on.
Just looking for thoughts, inputs on folks shooting the 10mm.
Click to expand...

I have all three 10mm Glocks. For what you describe, it's really a choice between the G20 and the G40.

The G40 has become my dedicated 'outdoors' gun: hiking, camping, or just saunterin' about in the boonies. It's super-accurate (for a Glock), and would be my Go-To hunting handgun if I pursued that form of deer hunting. (I don't - nothing against it; just other methods take up my hunting time).

Obviously the longer sight radius from the 6.2" slide/barrel contributes to that, and I run mine with steel Trijicon HDs rather than a micro-RDS mounted on the MOS platform. Just a personal preference, being Old School.

No threats of Brownies or grizzlies here. Only maybe the lone black bear spotted at distance at most. Coyotes are plentiful though and not bashful, and unfortunately we're seeing an increasing number of feral dogs, possibly hybrids. So 15+1 rounds of hard-hitting 10mm comfort is a good thing, and having one or two spare 15-rd mags in pouches on your hip is mo' better.

It's an OUTDOORS - 'woods, boonies, and trail' - gun. Therefore ammo selection is easy: you want Heavy & Fast. So bullet-weights of 200gns or 220gns minimum moving at speed are indicated.

Remember: there's ain't no such thing as 'overpenetration' while your out and about in Rough Country. :rolleyes:

So in factory ammo, look at Underwood, Buffalo Bore, or Double Tap, if you don't already roll your own. As always, spend the $$$ on a few extra boxes to test in your gun to ensure feeding and cycling reliability, especially if they're hard-cast loads.

The G40 rides most comfortably in a center-chest rig. There are several good choices out there, but I went with Galco's 'Great Alaskan' rig. It keeps the gun secure but immediately accessible while still leaving my hands free to engage in whatever activity I'm doing, ... like riding an ATV or mule, collecting wood for the camp fire, or just negotiating a steep trail with hiking my staff.

Hope this helps ... :cool:
 
Last edited:
If you like the 1911 platform, yet are on a budget, the RIA you mentioned will do quite well.

Personally, I stay away from Kimber due to very unfavorable experiences I've had with them. Too many other manufacturers out there that make quality 1911 variants that have much better customer service when the need arises.

Glock's G20 has been around for a long time. It's been proven to handle 10mm loads as long as their 9mm counterparts can. I hate Glocks, myself. But to turn you away from a Glock due to personal preferences is intellectually dishonest. Customer service is good. It shoots accurately. And pricing is in the middle of the pack for what it offers.

I rarely sell guns I buy. Unfortunately, I tried the EAA Witness in 10mm and it didn't work out for me at the range. If you have larger hands and don't mind a shallow slide, I would consider one. 14+1 rounds in a steel CZ type platform. Good fit/finish. Should find new ones under $600.

You want a polymer frame? XD(m) would be my choice. They aren't "close copies" of Glocks anymore a Ford is a close copy to a Chevy. Sig Mosquitoes? That's what you call a copy. I have no problem trusting the platform. There are issues with every platform there is. Glock Kabooms, etc. would make you think Glocks were garbage. They aren't. Most of the problems of today are people think you should be able to fire your gun 100,000 times with zero failures of any kind. Hate to burst anyone's bubble. There isn't a platform out there that can do it. Has there been one? Yup. A VW bug has logged 1 million miles, too. But rarely has another one made it. Bottom line is, if you're plannning on shooting your gun for 25000 rounds, expect some kind of wear and maintenance, no matter the brand. And clean/inspect your gun regularly. 99% of the people griping about the design of guns have unrealistic expectations of a tool.

Don't mind spending a little bit of money? I sold my Witness and bought a Springfield Range Officer Elite Operator in 10mm. I absolutely LOVE it.
 
The 10mm is a funny gun. It's only a good idea if you reload. At least it seemed that way when I got mine. Decent defense ammo was something like $40 per box.
 
I bought a Glock 21 recently and am able to shoot it well. I'm thinking if Uncle Sam comes through with cash, I'll seriously look for a Glock 20 and a set of dies. (Tongue in cheek) Reloading is my hobby, shooting is how I keep it going.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top