Wyoming G&F proposing Firearms Changes - .223 Legal for deer

Brian,

That's a valid point. We're so used to not being able to that you don't look at the possibility of doing it differently, so you don't see it.

As a side note, I'm in the process of building an AR and had been tossing around the idea of using it for deer, but I'd never thought of the possibility of shooting 200+yds. I don't have the ability to practice at those distances, so it's really not an option past "I know I'm here at 100yds, so I should be hitting there at 200," which isn't high on my list of things to do.
 
Here in Oregon, any center-fire .22 has been legal for deer for as long as I can remember. These little black tail deer we have are easy to drop assuming you can find one but it's still not very common to find a hunter using a .223.

It seems all the deer are living in or close to town these days and it's getting near impossible to find them out in the woods. I'm thinking seriously of giving up deer hunting.

Tony
 
just my opinion, based on my observations and reasoning

The one person I know personally that used a .223 on a deer (Ruger Ranch Rifle) was shooting a blacktail buck in the Pacific NW ..... he has nothing nice to say about the round.

Properly loaded, out of a long barrel, with the right twist, .223 would be adequate for short range, and small deer.

Having done most of my hunting where wide open spaces are the norm, and the deer have all the food they can eat pretty much year round .... I think there are better tools for the job.

Having seen quite a few deer running around with wounds in the days after opening weekend, or dead and not recovered, I think hunters should really use the best tools they can get their hands on......
 
I think we are jumping the gun on perceived problems.

First off I doubt you'll see a mass rush of people buying 223s for deer or antelope hunting.
Click to expand...
I don't see any "rush of people" buying .223s, either. They don't need to, because they already own them.
There are plenty of people out there that would like nothing more than to take their tacticool AR out on a big game hunt, but feared getting caught just enough to not do it in the past.


A hunter with poor ethics that would blast away with a high cap AR magazine is the same guy that would blast away with any other rifle.

You can't legislate ethics. Those who violate "fair chase" are going to violate fair chase regardless of what rifle they use.
Click to expand...
Yep. ...just as I discussed in the second half of my post.
 
I don't know if Wyoming has a mag capacity law but here in Missouri we do, so you can't hunt in Missouri with any rifle and use a high capacity mag.

Will a 223 work on deer, it sure will.
My oldest grandson killed his first deer when he was 8 years old using my AR in 223 caliber.
He shot a very nice doe at 175 yards and made a very clean one shot kill.

He was not using light jacket varmit bullets, he was using soft points designed for the task and he placed the shot well.

I was with him at the time and told him he could not shoot at a deer if it was over 200 yards away and he could not take a shot unless it was a good clean shot.

Do I use a 223 for deer hunting, no I do not.

The reasons why is, I know if I had a 223 with me that would be the time I would see that once in a lifetime buck at 400 yards and I don't feel the 223 cartridge is the right choice for that job.

Another reason is I have a decent selection of rifles to deer hunt with, my 280 being my favorite will most likely be the one in my hands.

As others have pointed out, limit the yardage you have to shoot, use a bullet constructed for the job, do your job placing the shot well and the 223 will kill your deer.

I recall seeing a documentary where Eskimos were hunting and killing Polar Bears with a 22 Hornet.

Best Regards
Bob Hunter
www.huntercustoms.com
 
We don't have any restriction on rifles. You can hunt deer with a rimfire if you wanted to I suppose. But, I have never heard of anybody doing it.
Matter of fact, I don't know anybody personally who uses a 22 centerfire. So, I don't see a mad rush to start using a 223 and will assume that those that do understand the limitations and aren't complete idiots.
 
Same old arguments from opinionated people with no experience. The 30-30 and 30-06 has wounded more deer than the .223 ever will. I said close in hunting. The man asked if anybody used a .223 for deer. I see where the dissenters are from and they just don't know any better. I hunt in stuff so thick I just watch shadows of deer sneak through at times. Other times I take head shots because it is all I can get. (That should get some "Expert" opinions posted) I have shot and seen many deer missing legs, gut shot, a front hoof shot off, and even one with a hole through the ear. You can hunt with almost any caliber you want, but you can't control the guy using it. I really don't see how it matters what a person uses. I used to live in a special regs area. You want to talk wounding, look into shotguns.
 
I see where the dissenters are from and they just don't know any better.
Click to expand...
I believe that would be more properly stated as:
"I see that some of the dissenters are from Wyoming and surrounding states, and may actually have a better idea of the terrain and hunter mentality, than I do."

I've hunted on the East coast. I've hunted out West.
Wyoming is its own world.

I hunt in Wyoming several times a year.
My opinions are from experience, not ignorant regurgitated internet blather, as you seem to be inferring.

It's not that people don't understand. It's that we live in different places, hunt different species, deal with different terrain, and use different hunting methods.

Hunters must adapt to the area they are in. As such, Wyoming's consideration of allowing .22 caliber centerfire rifles for some species, must also include consideration of the factors that hunters are dealing with in the field.


As for head shots....
I'm all for it, if the shooter is capable. I put a called shot into the left eye of an Antelope at 650 yards, in 2007; and chose a head shot on at least one Antelope every year except 2011. ;)
(I just wasn't feeling it, with the 25+ mph wind and 35+ mph gusts.)
 
I don't see what is gained by allowing .22 caliber rounds in.

When deer are small and the distances are normal, I've no problem. But in the North plains states that is not the case.
 
I don't see a problem with it. You are not going to have very many people using a 22 centerfire most likely. Most will stick with what they have already.

22 centerfire has been legal, then not legal, then legal again here in Utah.
I have run across only a handful of people using anything smaller than a 243.
I know one lady who used a Mini 14 on everything up to and including elk, she is very patient, will not shoot over a hundred yards, and always puts her bullet at the skull/spine intersection. She has also gone home empty handed several times because she could not get the shot she wanted.

People that will just start flinging lead willy nilly are going to do it with whatever they have, caliber won't matter.

I personally think a .233, 22-250, 220 swift etc with good bullets (not a varmint bullet)would be a far better game cartridge than say 25-20, 32-20, 30 carbine....... just my opinion.

The majority of shooters who will use a 22 centerfire I'm willing to bet are your more experienced hunters wanting a little more challenge. Which usually means they know their limits.
 
I know several people that use 223 on deer and even a couple that have used it on elk. In fact I know a guy that used a cast 223 boolit on deer with great results, tho it was a head shot. Its a very popular round and devastating on hogs, and hogs are way tuffer than deer.

I hope it is leagalized, but I have other guns that I will still use either way. I'm more excited about the 35 cal change. I got some wicked 357 cast loads that should be awesome on deer.:)
 
I see a lot about the right bullet. Oddly enough, one person mentioned that AND the .257 Roberts. I used Hornady 117 Grain RN for years and it was not the right bullet. It defies all logic, but at closer ranges they would not open up unless you hit something solid. Out around 100 yards and better they opened up fine through the lung area. I know of one other person that had the same problem with the .257 and one with a .243 (I don't know what bullet he was loading) that described the same thing. We all got lucky and got a second fast shot in the shoulder. After you kill enough deer you know instantly if it was a good shot or not almost every time. I had it happen to me twice and the first bullet through looked like I ran a target arrow through. Actually, the reaction made me think I shot under the deer and missed. After that I only shot into heavy parts of deer with the .257R. I never had a problem using Hornady Varmit bullets at close range on deer. Close up they are fine. If you start thinking heavy bullets, you are already planning on using that .223 in a manner that is stretching the capabilities of it. I would not hunt with mine on a day with heavy gusts of wind.
 
The bullet weight, design and intended use of the bullet is a major factor. If the proper bullet is used, a .223 could be an acceptable deer cartridge. We could say the same regarding the .243 Winchester. Some use ammo with bullets designed for target, coyotes or varmints instead of deer: and the results can be very disappointing. However, if the proper bullet is used, a .243 Winchester can do the job well on deer.
 
I have found "The proper bullet" to be very disappointing at times. I have been using a 7.62x39 for a long,long time and always use a 150 grain corlokt. The factory offerings years back were less than impressive. I absolutely believe in reading all I can about something I am working on. I just have the good sense not to believe everything I read.
 
I guess I just don't understand the problem. I know that with some of the modern-design bullets for the .223, it's a quite-adequate deer cartridge. But the general caveat has to do with the size of the deer, the type of shot and the range.

Not a lot different from the way I've used my .243 with the 85-grain HPBT bullets. Neck shots, cross-body heart/lung; no angling shots--and, mostly, a 200-yard limit.

But if I'm hunting where long shots are probable and particularly if the deer are generally larger than in central Texas, out comes the '06. IMO, reliable penetration for angling shots becomes a controlling factor.
 
Hopefully, I will soon see the effect of a proper .223 bullet on close range deer.
My 7 & 8 year old boys are going hunting for the first time this fall.
They will shoot from a blind and use a tri-pod.
Rife is a Windham SRC with Bushnell-TRS red-dot.
Shots will be restricted to 30 yards on broadside or slightly quartering deer.
Bullet is the 60 gr. Nosler Partition, chronographed @ 2,807 fps out of the 16'' barrel, my handload.
The .223 AR with recoil absorbing semi-auto action and adjustable stock was the best tool for the job.
 
I find it interesting that some TFL members favor banning .223 because some hunters might take foolish or unethical shots.

I wonder if those same members prefer to make it very difficult to get a carry permit...

And, I wonder if those same members support restrictions on legal adults, who happen to be under 21.

When we start supporting restrictions out of fears for what some bad apples may do, where do we stop?
 
Art Eatman

I have to agree that if you start taking long shots with a .223 you should probably just get out your 6.5 or .308. I load run of the mill 70 grain SP in my .22Hi-Power. I am pretty much stuck with these bullets because of the weird diameter. My AR.223 with Varmit bullets definitely messes up a deer more than the bullets loaded for the HI-Power. If I could find .228 Varmit bullets, I would definitely load them for the Hi-Power.
I have had problems in the past with bullets not measuring up to the advertising. Trying to compensate the short comings of a round with a different bullet design usually is a mistake. I stay away from the super duper expensive bullets that claim awesome penetration. These bullets usually do not do well at close ranges.
 
Brian don't you find the bigger bullets makes for easier tracking of wounded animals?

We have tons of hunters with 6.5x55 here, and it is a good round if placed well, but pigs and moose can tend to not bleed too much from bad hits, same placement with a 9.3x57(another pretty common calibre here) leaves much more to track

now this is circumstantial at best becuase it is not like I am a professional tracker or anything

And more concerning the topic the .222 is great for our most common deer the roe but I have a sneaky suspiscion that a big deer for us would be a tiny one for you;)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top