Double Naught Spy
New member
Are we going to go after the Tom Carter (Tombstone) incident as well?
Considering that there is absolutely nothing similar between the two cases other than that each involved a firearm, I don't find that to be even a little bit surprising.stagpanther said:What I find most interesting about this thread is that certain people who insist Baldwin is absolutely guilty--also maintain Rittenhouse is absolutely innocent.
Safety was ignored in several steps along the way, from what I gather. This all ultimately falls on the employer in my book.
I respectfully submit that the Baldwin case was not "accidental," it was negligent. It also wasn't a "misfire." The firearm and the cartridge both performed exactly as designed.44 AMP said:The Baldwin matter is an accidental shooting, no one has made any mention of anything else.
It may be a fool's errand -- or it may mean that we're just not trying hard enough.Double Naught Spy said:You know, we can't even get the people in the gun community to correctly make the distinction between accidental discharge and negligent discharge. So expecting the general public or media to make these distinctions and use the terms appropriately is something of a fool's errand.
As much as I dislike the man and unless they find new evidenvce I have to agree that it was an accidental. Leading up to that final event, It most certainly was 100% negligenece due to his ignorance and vanity. ......I respectfully submit that the Baldwin case was not "accidental," it was negligent. It also wasn't a "misfire." The firearm and the cartridge both performed exactly as designed.
Uuuuuh... Nodrew the hammer to almost full cock and apparently released it.
That will make an SSA go bang.