Why spend many thousands for older Pythons?

I would love to have an old Python, I think they are fantastic looking guns, but I simply can't justify spending that type of money. I know guys who have them, but never shoot them and I just don't see the point.

That said, I do have a Cobra from the early 1970s, and while they aren't held in esteem like Pythons are, it's an excellent shooter. I also have a new Cobra, Gen III if you will, and I think it's actually a better shooter with a better trigger.

That unto itself has me very interested in a new Python and once demand comes down, I might look to pick one up at some point.
 
One of the best quotes i've heard is "All that is Colt is not good,All that is good is not Colt."The Colt firearms of yesterday are not the ones being produced today. Yes i'd love too own an original Python, But I can get at least 2 S&W's for that price and be happy with owning something that I can shoot not just leave in a safe.
 
I've always liked the look of the python. Back in my younger years a friend of mind decided to run away from the cops because he was drunk and speeding. Well they yanked his permit and he had to sell his guns. He called me offering me a 4 inch royal blue hardly fired python for $200. Being a college student with limited funds I passed plus I had just recently bought a SW 686. I still regret that decision and always wanted a python but could not justify the crazy money they were asking. Bottom line: If and when they come out with a blued version I'm getting one. They are just too pretty for me and life is too short.
 
I got into handguns big time back in 1973. As my collection slowly grew, I came to lust after a Python, just like everybody else. But, they were crazy expensive for the time and I knew I'd probably never own one.

Then comes 1993, and fate opened up the opportunity for me to purchase a near mint 1978 blued Python for $350. I jumped at the chance. I remember taking the Python home that night and just looking at it on my lap, not being able to believe that I finally had a real Python.

When Colt discontinued the gun, I remember being amazed at how the prices for Pythons began to quickly creep up. At some point, I stopped shooting it, afraid that I might drop it, or damage it, or break it and it couldn't be repaired. I finally realized that I had this gun that was worth $2K in my safe, but, unless I sold it, it wasn't worth a hill of beans to me.

So, the Python that I had thought about and coveted for so long and finally had been able to own, went away.

I'd still like to have my '78 Python. But, it wouldn't make much sense. As for the new one, I think they'll be a great gun when Colt figures out how to make them work 100%. And, they will. With CNC machine tools and strengthening in a few critical places, I think that they're ultimately as good as, if not better than the old Pythons, hand fitting be damned.

I've still got 2 GP100's and a 686-3. Personally, I think that Colt has built a great $900 revolver that a lot of people are willing to pay $1500 for. But, 40 years from now...if private firearms ownership hasn't become a faded memory...I think folks will be looking at the new Python with the same regard that we now look at the originals.
 
A friend is fond of telling me to look at those $2-3000 Pythons and see they are not "moving". $12-1500 ones are.

Sure, every once in a while some gullible person buys one, but as a rule they just sit while the ones with lower asking prices get snapped up fairly quickly.
Click to expand...

Your friend doesn’t have it quite right. There is plenty of movement for particularly collectible Pythons, and at well north of $3,000. But there are also plenty of people who think their regular 1980s 6” blued Python with some finish wear should fetch a similar price to a high-condition 1950s or 1960s example. Those are the ones that sit and clog up GB endlessly.
 
Last edited:
Back in the 80’s I had a High Standard 22 revolver and a MkV Colt Trooper. Sold them both to buy what I wanted, which was a Colt Diamondback 22 with a 4” barrel and a Python with a 4” barrel. Both were in Nickel. Paid about $350 or so for each, and still have them and don’t plan to ever sell them. The grandkids and visitors love shooting the Python, and part of that joy is certainly due to the Walking Dead. They want their picture holding and shooting it.

After owning and shooting it for about 40 years, I worried about damage, so I bought a S&W 686+ to take on the shooting load. It was not as smooth as the Python, nor finished as well, but still a nice revolver. I had a gunsmith smooth out the SA and DA to a degree equal to the Python. The 686 took a little getting used to, but now I think I shoot it a bit better in DA than I do the Python.

Had I known that Colt was bringing back revolvers, I would have waited for the Cobra or Python, but then I would have missed out on that terrific shooting 686.
 
I’ve owned a bunch of Pythons. I still have one nickel Python left. The trigger on a Python never really did it for me. I prefer the Smith trigger.

That said, the new Python looks like a Python. That was always the selling point. It was, and is, a beautiful revolver.

If you’re just gonna hang it on a wall, a print of a Monet is just as good as an original at a fraction of the cost. The comparison doesn’t work with the Python. (Ignoring possible teething problems from a new release) I think the new Python may turn out to be a mechanically superior firearm than the original. And, it still looks like a Python.

I’ve always thought they looks and lines were fantastic. I’ll likely get one.

For pure use, if it rivals the 686, it should be a great gun. Without that dang hole in the side.

But, some folks will still want an original. Good for them. I’m not planning on getting rid of the one I have.
 
My take on vintage Pythons

The new ones might perform the same, or even better than the vintage Pythons, but as gun fanatics we are all a bit snobbish when it comes to high-end sidearms. I'll give my thoughts, and I'm sure a lot of folks here will agree.

The old saying that "they just don't build them like they used to" .... has a lot of truth in it. At today's labor cost and diminishing skill set, and the material selection for the SS pythons for today's production, very limited gunsmith craftsmanship is involved. Consequently, to me there is a big difference. The Royal blue displayed from the vintage Python is the hallmark that can never be replicated with stainless steel. So the current production pythons are just PINOS (Pythons in name only). The big difference in price between the old and the new is dictated by demand and supply. New ones are cheaper because it is in production, and although the inventory is in short supply, production will eventually catch up. However, they just don't make the old ones and that is why the price keep appreciating.
 
I've never even fired one. Good looking handgun.
On " hand fitting" Highly skilled folks can do amazing things.
But actually,the NEED for hand fitting comes from old school manufacturing practices that produce variation. The hole patterns,old school, might involve clamping the frame forging in a fixture box that has drill bushings in the top plate,. The machinist stood at the gang drill, a row of drill presses,and simply used the drill bushings as a template to locate the holes.
Internals like a hammer or trigger were perhaps blanked out on a shaper. I know when I have made old irregular gun parts,like Rolling block extractors,I was often way ahead to think and set up like I was using a shaper,make a bar with the profile of the part,then slice them off with a slotting saw.

But realize today you can start with a prehard piece of flat ground air hardening tool steel and cut any profile ,including sears and hammer notches with a wire EDM,driven by a CNC program. All the parts will be the same within tenths of a thousandth. Hand fitting is not better.
Same with precision grinding.

The old exercise for the toolmaker apprentice was filing out a 1 inch a square,flat,dimensionally accurate cube. Seems to me .001 tolerance was the goal. While I appreciate the skill, The person with a Bridgeport can mill a cube a little oversize pretty quick. Then we can use the Hermann Schmidt toolmaker vise and the Harig surface grinder to make a very accurate cube much faster. And,likely better.

Side by side,two cubes. One hand filed, one knocked out with mill and a grinder. Both o-1 steel,1.000 + or-- .001. Same specs

Which is worth more,and why?

Is he hand filed cube worth $1200 and the machined cube worth $120 ?

Why?

Your emotions can buy a Python for thousands.

Many men have spent thousands of dollars on a few hours of pleasant company....and then found it would cost them far more.

I like to think I have become more pragmatic. To me? Personally? I doubt I'd pull more than $600 out of my wallet,and that is mostly by reputation.

For a DA? Maybe a 44 SPL GP-100 Ruger. And I have not needed one of those enough to buy one.
 
Last edited:
What's a gun worth? In short, it is worth just what someone is willing to pay for it.
Click to expand...
My opinion too. Pythons (or really any DA) doesn't do anything for me. Side by side, with a beautiful Single Action ... Just no comparison no matter how deep and shiny the bluing :) or which makes the heart rate go up a bit. Beauty is in eye of the beholder though, so I don't gain say another man's tastes in revolvers or rifles. Just glad we have a variety!
 
with a beautiful Single Action
Click to expand...

I do not have a Colt or a clone, but I DO have a SBH I cut to 5 in, A Bisley Ruger Single Six,32 H+R 6 in bbl,adj sights, And a 44 spl Bisley Lipsey Special,4 5/8

I DO like single actions
 
osbornk said:
I think people will pay a premium for the old over the new for the same reason people will pay a premium for an old Mustang or Camaro over a new one. The new one may be better in every way but there is an attachment for the old that defies logic. The old brings back memories of the past that the new cannot do.
Click to expand...

I think this is a close analogy. New cars are better in every way, but the nostalgia factor is a multiplier for the price.

My dad bought the very first 1964 1/2 Mustang that ever rolled into his hometown. It had the 289 V-8 and a 4-speed transmission. No AC, no power steering, windows, locks, etc. He paid $3600 for it. Imagine if you found one of these cars today. How much would it be worth in 90% original condition. It still wouldn't stack up against a new model in performance or options...not even close. But it would still sell for more than a new one.

Now, if you found a Python in 90% condition, you would need to consider performance against a new model (or any new revolver). It would probably be close in performance with those produced today. Yet the price appreciation is often frowned upon. New Mustangs generally sell for 10x (or more) the price my dad paid back in late '64.

With that in mind, wouldn't it be reasonable for Pythons to fetch 10x the original price when the pistol was sold? It seems particularly reasonable considering the performance differences between the original Mustang and the new one vs. the performance differences between an original Python and a new one.

And yes, I do own a '79 Python. But I received it as a gift for my 50th birthday, and I have no intention of selling it regardless of price. I just like the way it looks and shoots.
 
Last edited:
I visited a gun shop this week and they had some original Pythons.
The prices were not in the stratosphere.

I think the trend may be waning.

:confused:
 
I was at my LGS a couple of days ago and they had an original one, with a 2.5" barrel, that appeared to be in unfired outside the factory condition. It was tagged at $$4500.00. I think it had the box, papers and such, but can't swear to that. Since it was in the "If you have to ask, you can't afford it" cabinet, I didn't ask to see it closely.

I saw on their website it is now listed as "out of stock."

I've got three of the "new" ones now. One 6" and two of the 4.2" ones. I paid the same for the three as they were asking for that one.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top