Why do So Many People Shun Revolvers?

I'm going back to revolvers. My hands are getting arthritic, and I have a hard time now racking semi-autos.
Plus, I'm getting sick and tired of having to take them down to clean them. Mine are 1911s and I'm just sick of the hassle of dealing with disassembling the guide rod, etc to clean them.
Hence, I'm finding revolvers much more to my liking.
 
The nice thing of a 357 gives user the choice of what he puts into it's cylinder.... I like assortments of 38 +P........but nice to have the ability to go for flames too.....your right about the night light........issues.........
 
"Why Do So Many People Shun Revolvers?"

I don't know, but I hope they keep doing it so I can find guns like a pristine Model 29, recessed chambers, PERECT bluing for $400 like I picked up wednesday. . . :eek:

KEEP TRADING THOSE "OLD CLUNKERS" IN, BOTTOMFEEDER LOVERS!!" :D
 
There are some well made points posted here. I'm finding that I just don't like magazines. I know we have speedloaders/speed strips/moon clips, but none of these are necessary to actually fire a revolver. I'm more in search of simplicity --thus, revolvers, lever actions, and maybe an un-altered SKS have much more appeal to me.

R/fiVe
 
My first and still favorite revolver was a 4" Ruger Security Six stainless 357. I shot it for years and years, shot every imaginable bullet and handload, and became very confident with it. But I never carried it concealed, was more of a hunter and plinker type. Then circumstances changed and I felt I needed a ccw handgun. I tried to use my faithful 357 but just couldn't become comfortable toting it around. Not comfort per se, but in trying to conceal it.

I changed to a flat sided auto (1911) and have been happy ever since. My hat's off to those that can and do carry revolvers concealed - they are well armed. It just didn't work for me. YMMV.

As for the movie influence, most cinema pistols are such wierd looking mutations that you'd think they'd turn people off to semi-autos.
 
I had an extremely bad experience with a S&W 442 that turned me off from revolvers for a couple of years. It took the 686 to bring me back into the fold and now I wouldn't be suprised if my revolver collection takes over the number of pistols I own. I think why some folks shun the revolver had a lot to do with their experience, although IMHO, as a BUG, revolvers are more reliable than an auto.
 
Man, what a post! I have two of each. Here are my thoughts.

I like the semi auto because of the ease of trigger pull when trying to shoot straight. The revolver takes alot more control when pulling the trigger.

I remember making the switch in the military from the Model 10 SW to the Beretta 9mm. No one was ready to crack one off so easily and smoothly. It was surprising

So far though, I like a SAA, simply because I like taking the time to cock and aim, and it feels good.

For whatever reason, I am just more drawn to the wheel guns, new and old, and I am trying to find the ideal fit for me. Think S&W performance 627, cause I love that 8 shot idea.

I also have a ruger new model blackhawk convertible, and I like the option of 9mm or 357/38, but man ol' man, the 357 is by far the most fun to date.
 
Addendum: I've found since my posting revolvers actually hurt my arthritic hands to fire more than semis.
So while I'm keeping my old S&W 19-3 6 inch and my Blackhawk .357, I'm sticking to my Hi Power and 92FS after all.

If I had the cash however, I'd not mind adding a 686+ to my collection.
 
Matrix

I just turned 28 and I am just about the only one of my peers and friends that likes revolvers....old revolvers even more. (I like the plain jane look to the Colt Official Police, not a lot of bulk or shrouds or anything extra, just a nice barrel with an ejector rod and a medium sized gun, probably my fav.). I like Python's. They look cool and are powerful. I like Model 19 S&W. I like S&W .38/44. I like a lot of the old blue steel finish revolvers out there. The revolvers I care for the least are the stainless steel ones and that's merely because of looks, not because of quality or anything. Seems to me a stainless steel gun would stick out like a sore thumb in the holster under your coat if the wind was blowing. The only auto that I really like is the 1911 auto. And the only reason I like it (but rarely carry it) is because of the same reason I like the revolver. They have history behind them. The revolver, as one of the earlier posters of this thread noted, has 2 centuries under it's belt. It has more of a story to tell. The SAA was used by military and cowboys alike throughout the latter 19th century and even into the 20th century in more rural areas. The Official Police and S&W Model 10 was used by policemen and government agents for over 100 years (you can probably find a few old policemen out there here and there who still carry theirs). The Python was the "Rolls Royce" of revolvers in it's day and many would say that it still is. (not sure that I wouldn't say that). I grew up on a lot of old movies and the Official Police was as common in movies from the 30s to the 60s as the Glock 9mm is in movies now. I think revolvers are a simpler weapon. I don't like carrying my 1911 because I don't like having to worry about 10 different things while carrying it. Is there a bullet in the chamber, is it ready to fire, is the hammer cocked, is the safety on, is the magazine in the gun, is the magazine loaded? A revolver is just ready to go. Yes it only has 5-9 shots, but so what. How many are you likely to need. Chances are if you need more shots than that than you are probably gonna die anyway, either from being overwhelmed or just being a lousy shot. I don't need to go over the tradeoffs between revolvers and automatics (reliability, jamming, etc.) It's all been covered in this and other threads.

As I mentioned, I am the only one in of all my friends my age who feels this way. I often get frowns whenever they see i have a revolver. "A revolver, those are outdated, they have lighter guns now with more capacity bla bla bla." (the person who specifically said that, to my knowledge, has never fired a gun in his life and if he had, he would know that weight isn't necessarily a bad thing....it cuts down on recoil. Lighter guns have more recoil.). But all my friends who own guns, have 9mm Berrettas, Glock 15s, 9mm Brownings, 9mm Springfields, 9mm Rugers etc. And they love them. Which is fine with me. If they like driving a sports car why should I criticize them because I drive a Ford Explorer.

But I think the reason for all of this is psyhcological. They see weird movies like The Matrix with Keanu Reeves walking into a building and bouncing off the walls firing 1000 rounds from his two 9mm autos dropping everybody in the room I can see how they can look at a revolver and feel it's "uncool" and "outdated."

But one shot from a revolver can easily beat 15 shots from an auto. The former kills. The latter sprays and makes you feel cool...but usually misses. I took my 1911 to the gun range a few weeks ago and sprayed a siluette target as fast as I could only about 7 yards from me.....only 1 and a half shots hit the paper. That's right, 1.5 shots. (meaning half of one shot clipped the edge of the paper. The one shot that completely hit the paper barely winged the siluette figure.)
 
Lots of stereotyping going on. 15 shot 9mm's don't spray, though some shooters do. Those same shooters would be no more accurate with a revolver. Revolvers more reliable than autoloaders? Possibly under some conditions, though under other conditions the autoloader gets the edge. One generalization is that revos tolerate neglect better while autos tolerate abuse better.
I own about as many revolvers as I do autoloaders, so I can't say that I inherently favor one over the other. I generally carry an autoloader for personal defense because I find one in an appropriate caliber somewhat easier to conceal than a similarly sized revolver. In the age of polymer, there is a substantial weight savings as well. I have carried a revolver for self defense. I would feel far from unarmed if all I had for carry was my S&W 66. Similar weapons served generations of people quite well.
For hunting, I use a revolver because a cartridge in the appropriate power range for hunting is available in much more reasonably sized revolvers than autoloaders and because state law here does not permit autoloaders.
 
I personally prefer revolvers. I like the simplicity, reliability, and vintage cool factor. I like the option of DA or SA shooting. Shooting .357 mags out of my Service Six is just plain fun. I've yet to shoot a semiauto I enjoyed as much as a revolver.
 
Another thing I like about wheelies is the intimidation factor. When the BG looks at the gaping maw of your N frame, he'll see those shiny Gold Dots looking right back at him.

On the cover of a recent gun mag, can't remember which, they had a shot of the new S&W 460XVR. It was loaded with red-tipped ammo, that looked like six huge missles sitting in silos ready to fire. If that thing was aimed at me, I'd haul my ass back the way I came and never look back.
 
Lots of stereotyping going on. 15 shot 9mm's don't spray, though some shooters do. Those same shooters would be no more accurate with a revolver. Revolvers more reliable than autoloaders?

Oh, my critisizm wasn't directed at the automatic itself but the shooter's attitude to it. Like you said, autos don't spray, shooters do. I can spray with my revolver but I'd rather shoot. A lot of the idea behind high capacity is that if I can rapid fire and spray the area with 15 bullets then I can kill anything.

Of course if anyone knows how to shoot then they can handle a revolver and an auto both.

In a nutshell, it's quality not quantity that is to be desired.
 
I have both love them like a child loves there moma
i carry a sig p226 9mm on duty (LEO) when off duty s&w 581
ruger black hawk 357 when hunting
s&w 12-2 38spc. for BBQ gun
sig 230 cal.380 BUG to the p226
sig p239 40 cal. CCW
so I'm bi when it come to semi or revolver
 
I have an old Iver Johnson 38 hammerless from late 1800's in horrible condition, innacurate as hell with some of the finish gone. I still love the way it looks and feels compared to me cz52 semi auto. Theres nothing like a chrome plated revolver for a lot of people my age even when its worn. As previously stated, if you have experince and practice you can hit the target 15 times in a row with a semi in speed shooting. I have done it 8 out of 8 with my 8 round mag. I even do better sometimes when I speed shoot with my semi. But there is nothing like the reactions from the new guys at the range when I pull out that big 8 inch barreled 45LC conversion revolver and hit the bullseye. They are intimidating as hell. They make great big heavy clubs when they run out of bullets too.
 
revolver's ablity to fire more than one type of load.

I like revolvers better than semi-auto because the are more dependable in my experience, I had a beretta 9000s 9mm jam on me. There loads are usually more powerful. Look into the 460 by S/W and they can shoot more than one caliber is some loads: 445Supermag shoots 445super mags, 44mag, 44special, 357supermag, 357mag, 38special, 357mag, 38special, 44mag, 44special, ruger single shoot convert. 357mag and 9mm package in blackhawk, 45lc and 45acp, my super single six 22lr and 22win mag, 17mac , and 17 mac 2 hunter. And I am currently in a pending trade for a dan wessonm [pistol pack multi barrels, other than the desert eagle and the wildley not many makers other than T/C over mult barrels in handguns.
 
I think it depends...

For one thing the choice between the two largely depends on what you want to use it for. There is no doubt that a good double action .357 Magnum is far more versatile than any semi-automatic pistol. It can be used with .38 Special wadcutters at 700 fps and it can be used with 125g bullets at 1500 fps - with many options in between. A good .357 Magnum revolver will defend you just as good as any semi-automatic pistol and it also makes a very adequate hunting pistol for deer sized game. My 686P carries 7 shots and somebody correct me if I am wrong but the average "gunfight" results in 3 shots being fired. Sure we can find exceptions, but I have a hard time believing that a semi-auto is as reliable as a good DA revolver. I have never seen a revolver jump crimp and lock up, and I have shot many many thousands of rounds of ammo through revolvers, and been involved with quite a few pistol matches and again never have I seen a revolver lock up. I am not doubting it happens - I just don't think it happens very often. I own quite a few semi-auto's and any one of them I have fired hundreds of rounds has experienced some sort of malfunction. Now trying to conceal a large revolver is tough - but then again a Glock 21 isn't very easy to hide either.

I usually carry a Kahr K40 or a Ruger SP101. I feel well protected with either.
 
Hollywood.
People want to believe that you can just point an auto pistol in the general direction of the target and spray and pray and that you will hit something.
Of course, that don't work too well in the real world.

But it looks cool in movies and on TV, along with the excessive slide racking, so people who don't know didly about guns think that somehow the autoloader is the magic gun that takes away the need to know what the heck your are doing.
I see a snub nose K frame as a carry gun, these days, I figure I'm looking at a pro. I see tactical tupperwear and I ask St Michael to protect the guy toting it....
 
Back
Top