Why aren't pump action hunting rifles more popular?

R

Roadkill2228

New member
The pump action is without question the most popular shotgun action, but apparently is just not the action of choice for centerfire hunting rifles. Yes I know there are some out there (shot my first deer with a borrowed remington 7600 in .30-06 and that gun just felt right if you know what I mean). Given the universality of the 12 guage pump as a simple, effective, inexpensive personal defence weapon, I can't imagine that reliability is a huge concern. As far as being more complex to make and peskier to clean than a bolt gun: so are lever guns and they are immensely poputlar hunting rifles. The pump action is at least as fast cycling as a lever gun (and in my hands it's a lot faster...never been that good with a lever gun). So why haven't pump action centerfires caught on?
 
Good question. Not sure..... Probably mostly due to reputation for poor accuracy (whether deserved or not). Less positive extraction in gritty conditions (and reputation for same) might be part of it too.
 
When I think of pump actions...I think of over complicated actions with long flimsy connecting bars that love to bend and snap when something binds up. I have enough fun breaking down mossberg 500s at work for occasional cleaning... I dont want that headache from any of my personal weapons
 
Well, pump actions are heavy, complicated, and more expensive to make. There have been several very successful pump action rifle designs over the years. All in all they are more expensive to manufacture than a comparable lever action or bolt action, costing as much as many semi-autos. And since most shooters look at the price tag first, they are likely to remain relatively uncommon.
 
Nemesiss45: I am not especially knowledgeable about the working mechanisms of pump and lever actions...you mention some problems with the reliability of the pump action: are lever actions less prone to said malfunctions?
 
I wouldnt be the person to answer that. I really only have marginal experience with pump shotguns and maybe one or two pump .22s... one of the .22s is the one that bent the connecing bars... but its been so long ago I cant remember the model or the details of the problem.
 
Scorch...why is a pump rifle comparatively expensive to make but a pump shot gun can be had for so little? Does the enormously higher operating pressure of a centerfire rifle round compared to a shotgun shell have something to do with it?
 
What water-man said.My dad has 7600 in 35 whelen that shoots extremely well.Like 3/4 moa well.My dad loves it for elk hunting.I think if more people had the opportunity to handle one in the field,more people would use them.
 
A pump action in .35 whelen sounds like quite a force to be reckoned with up close and personal (and at range too I suppose)...I've actually wondered about that...I think, assuming there aren't any reliability problems, that a rem 7600 in .35 whelen or something like that with a little 18" barrel would be at least as good of a "guide gun" as a lever action 45-70 plus with much better ballistics down range making it far more versatile. But it still wouldn't look as cool I guess.
 
Maybe due to it being hard to pump in a prone position, ie when on a bi-pod or sand bag...similarly to why the US army chose not to pursue lever rifles when developing the 30-06.?
 
i have 8 or 9 pump rifles from .22 to 30-06 and have never had a problem with any of them ftf or fte, with only minor cleaning. i shoot reloads out of all the centerfires, my deer load for the 30-06 is 55grs imr 4350 and a nosler bt 165gr bullet and it shoots into 1-1.5 inch three shot groups at 100yds. out of a pump .280 i shoot a 154gr sst hornady at a honest 2800fps with imr 4831 and have shot 4-5 inch three shot groups at 300 yds. these rifles may not win any shooting contests, but they will knock the socks off any game animals out to 300yds and if you do need a follow up shot only the semi auto if faster. eastbank.
 
Why aren't they more popular? Because the market isn't there, and that's the simple truth.

I'm a fan of the Remington 760/7600, but I understand the strengths and weaknesses of the system. Very accurate rifles, the barrels are free-floated by design, and every one I've shot has been capable of very good field accuracy. The main weakness of that system is the magazine, which is very particular in the way the magazine is seated. It's not a magazine that you can slam into the mag well and have good feeding. The magazine must be seated slowly and deliberately.

One of the design features of the 760/7600 is that the rifle tends to unlock during the recoil phase of firing. It's a design feature that scares some people, especially if they are unfamiliar with the design. When benchresting a 760, it become apparent that during recoil the breech tends to open. This is not a problem, and is purely a design feature to make the rifle pump faster, but when guys benchrest one, look down and see the action partially open after firing, they think something is wrong.

But, the simple question of why pump rifles aren't more popular is because folks don't buy them, the companies don't make them, so folks don't buy them.
 
Thanks 375NE. That makes good sense. But I still don't get why the pump should be any less popular than the lever. Maybe it's simply a matter of what pawpaw is talking about, a bit of a circular thing; people don't buy then so companies don't make them, and because companies don't make them they are not commonly available, so people don't buy them. As for the action opening up during recoil, I have an old(ish) winchester pump shotgun that does that too. In fact, firing it one handed, the action opens all the way and ejected the shell! The slide on that gun is smooth enough that i can thrust my arm forward and the inertia from that sends the slide forward hard enough to chamber the next shell and lock up the gun, so i can keep on firing that thing one handed if need be.
 
I'm going to agree 100% with Paw-Paw on this one. I asked my father years ago this exact same question, and he came up with what I have accepted to be a pretty good answer;

People use pump action shotguns because when bird or rabbit hunting, you don't have to remove the gun from your shoulder and can quickly fire a follow up shot if necessary. This is also almost always done from the standing. Likewise, this could be the reason bolt action shotguns were never that popular (other than for using slugs when deer hunting) and the lever action shotguns faltered as well.

When deer hunting (as an example), most halfway decent hunters pride themselves in a '1 shot drop,' and are firing from the sitting position(sometimes prone) and bolt actions fill this niche wonderfully, allowing the user to work the action from the prone if necessary. Just like another member stated the U.S Army never pursued lever guns in 30-06 and went with a bolt action...

I feel that the above reasons became the norm, and people just stuck with what they knew, kind of like myself. Ive always used a Model 94 Winchester or a Model 70, but my friend Jason (who has killed 10 times the amount of big game as me) has always sworn by his 760 in .270... I have a feeling that was his first hunting rifle so therefore its his 'go-to' gun...

I personally think that there were just so many more bolt action and lever guns already on the market, so there was never a huge demand for slide action rifles so many of them went to the wayside. Manufacturers didn't see much profit and people weren't clamoring for them.
 
Last edited:
I also agree with there's no market for it. The tube magazine makes it complicated with pointed bullets. It's just easier to have a bolt gun. You could have a box fed pump but that seems somewhat pointless. Rifles are usually meant to be fired at one target and with one shot. So why have a pump rifle? I do think the Colt pump action rifle was a good idea, for possibly home defense. But as a deer rifle, a pump gun doesn't seem likea great idea, plus its heavy.
 
Lots of reason, lots of history...

There are a lot of reasons that go into the general preferences of the buying public. And tied in with that are the products made and sold.

The capabilities, and drawbacks of the early designs form a huge opinion base, for both good and ill.

The biggest reason pump shotguns are virtually universal and pump rifles are scarce is simply that the pump action gives a greater benefit in shotgun use than it does in most rifle use.

And you might also notice that there are a huge number of successful lever action shotguns out there, too. (Sarcasm)

Size does play a part. The handing does too. Also, who's design got there first, and how well it works.

In the "deer rifle" market where I grew up, Remington pumps and semi autos competed with Winchester and Marlin levers. And, when it came to who sold the most, of what, Remington lost.

Lots of reasons, here's a few...
pre WWII you could get lots of very good Winchester, Marlin, and even Savage lever guns, and by and large, they could all use the common ammo (which was mostly Winchester designs). Remington had a line of their own. Remington guns only took Remington ammo.

That's a factor in popularity right there.

Out of the entire line of Remington cartridges, .25, .30, .32, & .35 Remington, the only one that has survived commercially has been the .35Rem. And that's because 1) there was no directly competing Winchester cartridge, and 2) It was chambered in a popular Marlin lever action rifle!

After WWII, when sporting rifle design and manufacturing began again, Remington got smarter. Their next generation of pumps and semis could take advantage of the full range of standard rifle cartridges, .30-06 length.

This opened up wider market, but one that was already well filled by the bolt action, and where the speed advantage of the pump over the bolt was essentially nullified.

The semi auto's competition is the other thing that ensured pump rifles would never dominate the market, absent some artificial rule or restriction. Simply because a lot of people who would buy a pump rifle would buy a semi instead.

I believe Pennsylvania has a game law forbidding semi auto rifles for deer hunting. The pump rifle is very popular there. Still lots of levers and bolts too.
 
Rem. 7600 in 30-06

My 7600 is much faster for follow up shots in the northern Wisconsin woods than any bolt action and it will put 150 grain spritzers in a 1-1/2 inch all day long. And I can change magazines in seconds .IMHO. hdbiker
 
Pawpaw says Remington pumps have free floating barrels. Their barrels only touch the receiver they're screwed into? The pump mechanics must also be free floating. Amazing.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top