I'm not traveling in a circle. The op simply asked "who made your primary CCW snubby?", to which I replied with the answer Colt Cobra and cited the advantage of having an extra round (six) in a revolver weighing the same and dimensionally virtually the same as the five-shot Smith J-frame (of which I currently own three variants). For whatever reason, you apparently took umbrage with the idea that 20% more ammunition in a similar size and weight revolver might be a good thing to have when defending yourself in a gunfight, to the point of arguing:
If you can't get the job done with 5, then you need to throw the gun at the BG and run.
I don't know where you get the idea that five shots is all that you'll
ever need in a self-defense situation and that if you run out of ammunition your best strategy is to run but I can tell you that, as a retired leo with thirty years of experience who has interviewed people unfortunate enough to have had to survive a fight where bullets were being exchanged,
NOBODY ever complained about having too many rounds on board. Nobody.
To reiterate, I simply don't see the downside of having an extra cartridge in a virtually identical snub-nosed revolver in terms of weight and size (the Colt Cobra/Agent as opposed to the Smith Airweight). Furthermore, I have no idea as to how anybody can be positive enough or sufficiently prophetic about a self-defense scenario taking place in the future to predict that all you'll ever need to survive a shoot-out are those magical five shots.
Finally, it's a mite disingenuous to argue that if a person finds "that one extra bullet to be so critical you would find ultimate peace of mind with 15" when the op's question limits the options to which
snubby revolver to recommend.