Which is more fun? .22LR autoloader or revolver?

Ruger MK II. Probably my most fun hand gun to shoot. I learned to shoot on the original Standard, and still always take out my MK II pretty much each and every time that I go shooting.

I believe that it is easier to clean than a revolver; cleaning basic pistol, not a full tear down. Full tear down is a little more time consuming, not bad once you know how, just a little more time.
 
Nice thing about a revolver is...it doesn't spread brass all over. But...then again, I have an auto.
 
I have some of both and enjoy shooting them all. Cleaning a revolver does take more time and effort but the payback is they'll shoot any ammo - even Remington bulk. Good DA revolvers are pricey though, a new S&W 617 is $600+ but it's a very high quality gun - I love my 10 shot version. Even the older S&W's like the the 17's and 18's are commanding very high prices. I had a Taurus 94 for a while and it was reliable but the DA trigger pull was extremely heavy so it wasn't fun to shoot.

You'll read lots of bad stuff about the Walther P22 and Sig Mosquito but the ones I own and shoot are reliable and fun. I also have a Ruger Mk II that is very reliable and accurate. No matter which way you go, they allow you to a lot of practice time cheap...
 
They're both a blast, just different.

My revolvers are a S&W 63 w/4" bbl. and a Dan Wesson 6".

My autoloaders are a High Standard Victor, High Standard Trophy, and a S&W Model 41.

So I shoot both types depending upon the mood at the time. :D
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the replies. You guys aren't making this choice easy! :p

I'd not really thought of the cost factor, but since your opinions seem rather evenly match, this may determine the final choice.

Sr
 
I have a 6-inch S&W model 17, target trigger, target hammer, adjustable sights. Tack driver, gorgeous, extremely well built.

I have a Ruger Mark II, 5-1/2 bull barrel, stainless. Heavy, great shooter, built like a tank.

Some people have extreme trouble taking apart a Mark I,II,or III. I don't. Easy to take apart and put back together... read the manual, get the hang of it, it's not rocket surgery. This pistol is easy to clean.

The model 17 is much more difficult to clean... can only clean from the muzzle end, and you obviously have to scrub each chamber, plus the forcing cone area, there' no doubt that it's much more difficult.

For shooting, I'd say the Mark II is easier, faster, and it doesn't give me many problems with cheap ammo. It's a damn good shooter. The model 17 is smooth, sweet and everything you want out of a revolver, but it doesn't load as easily, it doesn't eject spent shells as easily, and it costs significantly more to purchase one.

I think the revolver may make it's owner a better shooter than a semi-auto, because it seems to me that you have to put more work and effort in to what you are doing. With the semi, you can blast through 2 boxes of ammo in 15 minutes, especially if you have the two dollar plastic tool that helps to hold the magazine follower button down while you load, and even moreso if you have extra magazines. With the revolver, you spend more time loading and unloading, and working on each pull of the trigger. The semi-auto is pretty much just BANG BANG BANG, reload, BANG BANG BANG.

Fun factor, especially considering the price, the edge goes to my Mark II. But I would never, ever sell my Model 17. For sure, because of the cleaning, I tend to grab the Mark II more often.

Given the price, I don't see how any real handgun enthusiast can get by without having either a Buckmark or a Mark I,II or III in their safe. IMO, you have a huge hole in your collection without one.

I would not include one of the cheaper semi-autos in my line of thinking. While I don't begrudge anyone with a Walther P22 or one of the others, I've shot two different of them and they are finicky as hell with ammo. Mark II pistols I've shot are not, they just shoot and shoot.

With the S&W, it's not that I don't think it's worth the big money they cost, it's just that a quality Ruger, Buckmark, or S&W is just one helluva lot of gun for so much less money.
 
The are few handguns that are more fun to shoot than my H&R 999 Sportsman. Uncannily accurate, reliable with all types of ammo, and between the top-break design and HKS Speedloaders, reloading isn't much slower than an auto.
 
I like both. I have a MK II 22/45 and a Single Six. Can't say I prefer one over the other when just plinking for fun. Depends, I suppose. The auto allows me to send a lot of lead downrange fast while with the SS, it's like pretending to be Wyatt Earp.

22lr_guns.jpg
 
At one time the advantage was held by the revolver, since so many different types of ammo could be used in it, ie, shorts, longs, LR, shot, etc. Couldn't do that with an auto. Shorts were cheap and fun to shoot.

B U T - times have changed - have you looked at ammo? Shorts and Longs have now become "specialty" ammo and cost MORE, not less, than .22LR.

The revolver is more of a pain to clean. The auto is a breeze. You never have to extract empties, they're GONE.

Anyway, get both, that way you won't get bored.
 
Both, just depends where I'm shooting.

I take my Mark 111 to the pistol range and shoot at 15 and 25 yards.

I take my scoped 6 " S & W 617 to the rifle range and shoot it at 50 & 100 yards.

It is a rare trip to the range that one of them does not accompany the centerfires.......................ck
 
Can't say as I've ever had more fun with a handgun than I did with my good ol' Ruger Single Six :). Don't shoot it often, anymore. Seem to shoot only auto-loaders. Y'know, I oughtta get that Single Six out and shoot it again. Whatta y'all think of pin-shooting with a single-action .22 revolver? :D
 
When I go to the range (woods) I like my 6 inch SA, I't takes more time like some oyher folks said , but you tend too take your time & make shots count JMO Y/D
 
I have both revolvers and autos. my beratta 21a.is cheap practice for my seecamp 32. up close and personal ;)
 
One of Each!!

At least one of each! DA revolver, SA revolver, semi-automatic. They're all fun on different days.

I think the 4" 22/45 Mk III is easier to shoot than the 5 1/2" Single Six, and even easier to shoot than the 4" M18 S&W. But the S&W just oozes appeal and cool to my eyes. And I haven't put enough rounds through the S&W to really get a feel for it yet.

The Single-Six is a blast to shoot as well. Mine shoots .22LR, .22 CB Shorts and .22 Magnums to close to the same POI/POA out to 25 yards, which makes for fun plinking. Those CB caps at 25 yards on steel plates are a hoot! pop.... clank! pop.... clank! :cool:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top