The thread on "Why the 1911?" got me to thinking. What is it about Glocks that makes some people believe they are the greatest thing since sliced bread?
Now, I'm a hardcore 1911 lover, but I've never claimed it to be the perfect gun for everybody. In fact, I've even recommended that some folks not get a 1911.
And any of you who have read my posts know that I don't like Glocks period. I find them boxey, uncomfortable and butt ugly to boot. Not to mention the numerous threads on this board about Kbs, problems and malfunctions.
However, some of you out there seem to hold the opinion that the Glock is the do all, be all perfect handgun and if you're not using one then you must be wrong.
I'm not trying to start a flame war here. Just curious. Exactly what is it about tactical tupperware you folks find so fascinating?
BTW: That sound you hear is me ducking for cover!
Now, I'm a hardcore 1911 lover, but I've never claimed it to be the perfect gun for everybody. In fact, I've even recommended that some folks not get a 1911.
And any of you who have read my posts know that I don't like Glocks period. I find them boxey, uncomfortable and butt ugly to boot. Not to mention the numerous threads on this board about Kbs, problems and malfunctions.
However, some of you out there seem to hold the opinion that the Glock is the do all, be all perfect handgun and if you're not using one then you must be wrong.
I'm not trying to start a flame war here. Just curious. Exactly what is it about tactical tupperware you folks find so fascinating?
BTW: That sound you hear is me ducking for cover!