I've been buying firearms for 25 years now and my tastes have of could improved over that time. For several weeks I've been looking at a HP22 and reading reviews of it over the web. What took me so long in parting with $105 was the fact that it was an inexpensive handgun. I would have preferred to spend 250-300 for a Beretta or such because it would 'fit' in better with my current collection (no cheap guns). After reading all the reviews I could find on most .22 cal. pistols the fact remained that the HP22 sounded as good or better than all of them. My point is that dollars spent is just one indication of a good gun, look at the Raven .25 for over 20 years it's been considered a good enough gun to carry concealed and it went for way under $75 at that time. Hi-points are good, I've owned one, they just don't have the expense of walnut stocks and machined parts. To each their own.