KMKeller, It is often that we judge others by the motives we ourselves have. Is that how you come up with the idea that I had an ulterior motive? Perhaps you are not able to deal with people on an honest straight forward basis, and see that in others. I, on the other hand prefer to be up front, take chances on the good of others and suffer the consequences of my bad decisions. People are quite amazing, I have had numerous people contact me asking if I had any left over parts from a couple of classic cars I had. When I have told them yes and that I would ship and then email the cost of shipping to them, not one stiffed me. I gave them the parts as it was better to see the parts in use than gathering dust in my shop. I'd guess I shipped to about 10 people in this way. But I'm not a fool, I would not trust you.
If we wish to discuss logic, please explain how it is logical that Oleg's prior intent should should dictate his future actions. I may intend to buy a new car, keep it forever in mint condition, but if some one destroys it, it is not illogical to make the best of the situation. Man, or is that girl, you need to get your thought process straightened out. Life must be difficult when one is unable to think.
Which brings us to the point, should I post my sexual preference, all past and present sexual experiences, a list of relatives, friends and accquaintances prior to posting? Have you done the same? I missed that box when I was registering. Do you know of a site on the web where I may research this info for at least the populace of the posters of this board? It must be dark where you keep your head.
I would imagine that if you heard of, and I am only guessing now and giving you unearned credit, a mugger suing the person he tried to mug for beating the crapola out of him/her, you would think that is wrong. If you attack someone, you should expect to take a good shot back. And remember, I was jumped on with both feet. ( I don't need to make quips about people pointing fruit at me. I will defend myself.) The point you are putting forth here is basically that the mugger is entitled to sue, and yet you contradict yourself when you say that you are among those who will not allow themselves to be screwed. But then, perhaps you have an ulterior motive in defending Runt. Maybe you really think the mugger is right, and you just want something from Runt.
Now, when you find that this pisses you off, remember that you attacked me. Have enough spine, I doubt enough intelligence to reason through this, to accept that you asked for this. After all, you are the one who promulgates the idea that we should attack those who offend us. You are dismissed. Oh, and work on your understanding of personal responsibility. Sheesh, to think they let you have guns. Mike
P.S. The latin term for the false arguments you put forth, and for which I returned in kind, is ad hominem. It means against the man. This is the type of argument used by those unthinking individuals who feel that it is best to attack the person than come up with logical points that refute the other persons argument. I just wanted to demonstrate back to you what you were doing. I doubt that you are introspective enough to see it in yourself. Maybe my answer will goad you into thinking.
If we wish to discuss logic, please explain how it is logical that Oleg's prior intent should should dictate his future actions. I may intend to buy a new car, keep it forever in mint condition, but if some one destroys it, it is not illogical to make the best of the situation. Man, or is that girl, you need to get your thought process straightened out. Life must be difficult when one is unable to think.
Which brings us to the point, should I post my sexual preference, all past and present sexual experiences, a list of relatives, friends and accquaintances prior to posting? Have you done the same? I missed that box when I was registering. Do you know of a site on the web where I may research this info for at least the populace of the posters of this board? It must be dark where you keep your head.
I would imagine that if you heard of, and I am only guessing now and giving you unearned credit, a mugger suing the person he tried to mug for beating the crapola out of him/her, you would think that is wrong. If you attack someone, you should expect to take a good shot back. And remember, I was jumped on with both feet. ( I don't need to make quips about people pointing fruit at me. I will defend myself.) The point you are putting forth here is basically that the mugger is entitled to sue, and yet you contradict yourself when you say that you are among those who will not allow themselves to be screwed. But then, perhaps you have an ulterior motive in defending Runt. Maybe you really think the mugger is right, and you just want something from Runt.
Now, when you find that this pisses you off, remember that you attacked me. Have enough spine, I doubt enough intelligence to reason through this, to accept that you asked for this. After all, you are the one who promulgates the idea that we should attack those who offend us. You are dismissed. Oh, and work on your understanding of personal responsibility. Sheesh, to think they let you have guns. Mike
P.S. The latin term for the false arguments you put forth, and for which I returned in kind, is ad hominem. It means against the man. This is the type of argument used by those unthinking individuals who feel that it is best to attack the person than come up with logical points that refute the other persons argument. I just wanted to demonstrate back to you what you were doing. I doubt that you are introspective enough to see it in yourself. Maybe my answer will goad you into thinking.