LockedBreech
New member
Actually agree with PX4. It was the first pistol I had and now I own three Sigs, two Glocks, a Beretta 92FS, a Walther, etc. so I can say having had a wide selection of other guns that the PX4 really is an excellent pistol. Some models had some real teething issues at first and you need to run it wet or greased (I like a big of TW-25 on the lug and a CLP sheen on the barrel) for it to run smoothest, but most guns have teething issues out of the gate. Heck, the Gen 4 Glocks were troublesome for ages and are now excellent. Interesting that thousands of Gen 4 Glocks with crummy ejectors and recoil spring assemblies didn't ruin Glock's rep but one police agency having to use mallets on a bad batch of PX4s seemed to tank it.
Just like in the 92 series, the G-model (decocker only DA/SA, same as a Sig) is the way to go. I have an F-model and I need to trade or convert.
Just shy of 10,000 rounds without ever having a single wobble.
Edit: Just so we don't have to have this argument, I'm not smack talking Glock. I really like Glock. But there's no denying there were a bad few batches at the start of Gen 4.
Just like in the 92 series, the G-model (decocker only DA/SA, same as a Sig) is the way to go. I have an F-model and I need to trade or convert.
Just shy of 10,000 rounds without ever having a single wobble.
Edit: Just so we don't have to have this argument, I'm not smack talking Glock. I really like Glock. But there's no denying there were a bad few batches at the start of Gen 4.
Last edited: