Extremist: As a born cynic, I appreciate, and understand, your skepticism. But in this case, I feel you're relying on early reports and old information.
As we all know, when any new product hits the street, it has an upward climb toward product acceptance, since it's the 'new kid on the block', and hasn't 'proven itself'. Guns are no different, but in our case, that climb is much steeper. We gun owners are SIGNIFICANTLY more conservative, and slow to accept new models and designs, because of the critical nature of what a gun means to us in terms of life saving equipment.
So, when you read something about a new gun, bear in mind that part of the bellyaching can be dismissed as resistance in being accepted that takes the form of leaping to conclusions, part of it can be attributed to problems that are not gun-specific (ammo, user error), and the fact that human nature is such that we tend to complain louder than we commend.
That said, my 9mm P99 is about 3 months old, I have 2000 rounds through it, and it hasn't had a hissy-fit yet. Totally reliable, and a gun that I'd stake my life on.
jtduncan: Your point is well taken, but I wonder if 75% of the people here expressing opinions actually OWN a P99.
If not, those 'opinions' can be discounted. I think you raise a great point. A better test would be to poll the owners of P99's out there to see how many of us would buy the gun again. Then poll only those who own other similar guns (polymer frame guns, preferably striker fired, like Glock) to see which 9mm or .40cal they'd prefer, if it were given to them to take cost out of the equation.