Actually I have attended several Tac-Pistol Courses, where we did feel around in the dark on the ground for our pistol, and weak handed draws were about 25% of one class, along with weak hand only malfunction drills, and reloads. I always train like i'd like to fight, so instilling good gun handling skills, to autopilot level, helps in my ability to reatin those skills under pressure.NMG, I have a Glock. I don't think when actually under attach that someone has the luxury of perfect gunhandling skills. Have you ever practiced blindly searching the floor for your dropped gun and grasping it quickly? How about drawing it weak hand from leather? Will your fingers do the right thing when you're barely holding on to consciousness?
And their fathers, fathers, trusted muzzle loaders and flintlocks, why do we know so much better than them? My father trusted his life to a 6lb. trigger on a .357mag revolver, without a safety, sounds Glock-like to me.Our fathers trusted their lives to long 10lbs. DA triggers and positive manual safeties. Why do we know so much better than them?
When I said long SA mode, I meant SA with the trigger forward.
They are one and the same, AFAIK.I wouldn't carry it in the click mode, but I would carry it in the long SA mode.
It would have to be the pull before the "click", since after the click, the pistol is in SA-trigger rearward mode, correct?I think the word "click" is/was confusing. It doesn't/didn't clearly define the trigger position, i.e., is it before the click or after the click.
Actually, wasn't the 1911 originally designed without a thumb safety? I think I remember hearing that it was added at the request of the Cavalry? Or maybe it was the grip safety? I'm not up on my 1911 history, but I do know that one of the safeties wasn't on JMB's original design.Soldiers could have cocked their 1911 and trusted the grip safety, but have you heard anyone do that?
Why is it worse?Why is a 5 lbs. trigger with no grip safety better?
Why would a SWAT team require a weapon more "ready to go" than I would? In fact they would need a safer weapon, since they are working in close proximity to "friendlies" under stress, in an unfamiliar enviornment, whereas a typical SD situation would involve a homeowner in his house (familiar enviornment), investigating a known problem (no "friendlies" in close proximity).There is no reason for anyone (not on a swat team) to have a pistol that "ready to go" for defensive shooting.
I think the Glocks and others like it such as the P99QA, H&K LEM, etc. are an evolution of the KISS principle. Since whether you shoot a Sig, a 1911, or a Glock, you must keep your finger off the trigger until you are ready to fire, why not incorporate that as a safety, and remove one more variable from the fire sequenceI personally will not carry a defensive handgun with a manual safety. I think its odd, that in one sentence you say that under attack your gunhandling could go to crap, and you'll forget everything you've trained, but in the next, you seem to think that under that same stress, you'll remember to disengage that littly bitty lever that allows your gun to go bang.
In response Handy said:whereas a typical SD situation would involve a homeowner in his house (familiar enviornment), investigating a known problem (no "friendlies" in close proximity).
Maybe YOUR house has ranges up to 50 yards, but MY house is maximum 30' or so. Where did you come up with 50 yards? The same place where you decided that 5 lb trigger with no safety was too light?Your response to the Swat comment leads me to believe that you perceive the need to deliver pin point accuracy at any range up to 50 yards and you expect hostages.
I would think that you would prefer "Israeli Style" hammer down empty chamber, draw-rack-shoot, after all, it IS safer, and thats the way the Israeli "experts" carry.I did answer your Cocked and locked question, you just didn't understand. I don't like cocked and locked due to the stress shooting problem. However, it is the only intelligent way to carry certain types of firearms.
No, like I said, I will not carry a defensive pistol that has a manual safety... period. I will carry modern design pistols, which have multiple passive safeties, by carrying the 1911 cocked and unlocked, you are by-passing its main safety.I gather from your response you wouldn't apply the safety and just "be careful" instead?
Like I said, I am not up on my 1911 trivia, I do not remember who requested the extra safety, hence my "trivia" contained many ??? in it. But I do remember that the 1911 was originally designed without one of the safeties, and i'm thinking it was the thumb safety. I am correct in that part of the "trivia" aren't I?Also, when spouting 1911 trivia, keep in mind the calvary would have carried hammer down, as they did the Colt SAA.
Why are you so concerned with how I choose to carry MY defensive pistol?Where do you live that you aren't served by a DA first shot? East Timor?