Virginia’s ban troubles

Another holiday may be less controversial and divisive.

It pains me to apply either of those adjectives to a holiday celebrating Dr. King and his legacy. King and his followers (at the time) were believers in the 2nd Amendment because government oppression was a very real presence in their lives.
 
some of you are under the delusion that wearing a suit and tie and supporting the 2nd Amendment will matter to those attacking it. news flash, aside from water being wet, nothing you do image wise, nothing, will persuade an anti 2nd amendment politician.

It's not about convincing Bloomberg-bought-and-paid-for politicians. It's about winning-over fence-sitting voters...
 
Actually, Northam is declaring a state of emergency before the protests even happen. Something about that strikes me as very sinister.

I concur and this shows how far they are willing to go because they are in power.
I also believe this to be true with what we are seeing and hearing. Once laws are enacted it will be nearly impossible in getting them reversed.
Meanwhile, the vast majority of gun owners sit on the couch and complain when someone else didn't stop it from happening. Heck, most don't even vote. They can do all the rallies they want; Virginia is a lost cause.
 
I concur and this shows how far they are willing to go because they are in power.
I also believe this to be true with what we are seeing and hearing. Once laws are enacted it will be nearly impossible in getting them reversed.
I think VA has gone back and forth on some of their gun laws over the years. One gun a month is what they want to reinstate, meaning it was once the law but reversed. Plenty of gun laws have been reversed in my state. You can carry in way more places than in the past, and it even expanded further to include being able to store your firearm in locations that were once forbidden and no one ever thought those laws would change. And these are not laws that expired like the assault weapons ban.
 
NOT the politician but the people that put them in office.

Showing up like you are ready and EAGER for armed civil war, CERTAINLY won't. Any more than the guy all tacticool-ed up, swaggering around a city park waiting for a confrontation with LEOs..

NOT talking about 'that' end of the spectrum but the YUGE, unaffiliated, moderate middle. MUCH larger than either end of the spectrum. They vote, BTW..They don't have an opinion, in a lot of cases, and are watching things like this rally, to help make up their mind in November 2020..
John and Shirly Q. Public showing up to lobby day; silent, well mannered/behaved but armed to the teeth and FULL battle rattle, to protest draconian legislation...was and is A COMPLETELY APPROPRIATE RESPONSE. Anything less is what damn well got us to where we are in the first place.
 
Gerrymandering is as old as the republic. BOTH sides gerryamnder, some more than others.

Gerrymandering only occurs when a district goes against what the majority of the people who live there want.

In this case, the Government of Virginia does not serve the majority of the State but rather is bought and paid for to serve the wishes of one man.
 
davidsog said:
Gerrymandering only occurs when a district goes against what the majority of the people who live there want.
No.

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/gerrymander

Definition of gerrymander (Entry 2 of 2)

transitive verb
1 : to divide or arrange (a territorial unit) into election districts in a way that gives one political party an unfair advantage : to subject to gerrymandering
// The government gerrymandered urban districts to create rural majorities.
— Matthew Reiss

2 : to divide or arrange (an area) into political units to give special advantages to one group
// gerrymander a school district
 
to divide or arrange (a territorial unit) into election districts in a way that gives one political party an unfair advantage :

You cannot gerrymander in Wyoming for example. Why? The population of Democrats is so small as to be insignificant so you cannot lend an unfair advantage.

I believe in Virginia there are just three districts which are Democrat and those three districts control the entire state. An unfair advantage because most the state is at odds with a small section that now controls everything.
 
You cannot gerrymander in Wyoming for example. Why? The population of Democrats is so small as to be insignificant so you cannot lend an unfair advantage.

I believe in Virginia there are just three districts which are Democrat and those three districts control the entire state. An unfair advantage because most the state is at odds with a small section that now controls everything.
Do those 3 districts have a larger population than the rest of the state combined? Pretty sure why legislatures have a body based on population and one not. House of Representatives and Senate, type thing. But, as I mentioned and further expanded by Aguila, ‘gerrymandering’ is nothing new. Political parties have been doing this for over 200 years.
 
Two of them have a lack of compactness scores above 80% and District 11 is above 90% indicating gerrymandering in a direct application of the Polsby and Popper test.
 
The Obama DOJ simply outmaneuvered in the courts and is now able to impart a will upon the people of Virginia other than their own.

That is how revolutions begin.
 
I believe in Virginia there are just three districts which are Democrat and those three districts control the entire state.

They don't control the 100 seats in the VA House of Representatives or the 40 seats of the VA Senate.

A political party cannot control the VA legislature by failing to contest 40 seats in the VA legislature, just can't be done.

The 2017 legislative elections in VA were blowback from the election of Trump. The Democrats flipped 15 seats of the VA House. As a result of the 2017 election the Republican party abandoned Virginia. These two events set the stage for the 2019 election.

Yep, some folks on these boards would start a civil war because their political party lost an election. To them i say this: Jump right out there and start your civil war, don't be surprised when you have few, if any, followers.

As for me, i lost too many relatives on the losing side of the last civil war.
 
They don't control the 100 seats in the VA House of Representatives or the 40 seats of the VA Senate.

A political party cannot control the VA legislature by failing to contest 40 seats in the VA legislature, just can't be done.

The 2017 legislative elections in VA were blowback from the election of Trump. The Democrats flipped 15 seats of the VA House. As a result of the 2017 election the Republican party abandoned Virginia. These two events set the stage for the 2019 election.

Yep, some folks on these boards would start a civil war because their political party lost an election. To them i say this: Jump right out there and start your civil war, don't be surprised when you have few, if any, followers.

As for me, i lost too many relatives on the losing side of the last civil war.
Copy to davidsog..wasn't about the President Obama DOJ not gerrymandering.
 

Your post seems kind of unhinged to be honest. Especially the whole "calling for civil war" which is pure fantasy, not anything what was written, and a fiction you just perpetrated.

A system of Government that enforces it own will over that of the people does lead to revolution.

Now that is a fact and not a "call to civil war". It might not be a known fact to you but it having spent 26 1/2 years in the US Army in a job whose main mission in life was the conduct of Unconventional Warfare and its flip side, Foreign Internal Defense it is just a fact. When examining the socio-economic causes of the conflict that schism between the will of the people and the will of the those in power is a common theme.

Unconventional Warfare is working for an Insurgency with the aim of overthrowing a Government in power whereas Foreign Internal Defense is working for the Government in Power against an Insurgency.

It also does nothing to change the fact that those districts:

Two of them have a lack of compactness scores above 80% and District 11 is above 90% indicating gerrymandering in a direct application of the Polsby and Popper test.
 
“Democrats can’t beat President Trump and they can’t take back the Senate, so they’re spending staggering sums in state elections to make it easier for radical liberals to win in heavily gerrymandered districts,”

Democrats plan $50M campaign to flip state legislatures before redistricting

https://www.politico.com/news/2020/01/15/redistricting-state-legislatures-campaign-099437

Here is their website organizing the gerrymandering campaign:

https://flippable.org/our-targets/virginia/

Yes both sides Gerrymander. To deny what happened in Virginia as anything other than the result of a concerted effort to Gerrymander in their own political parties favor is deny the truth.

The largest problem is the definition of a voting district varies so widely. It runs the gamut from adhering to existing administrative boundaries to including political homogeneity to political diversity. IMHO, the Supreme Court failed the American People in its job by not taking the opportunity to establish a single definition in Gill vs Whitford.

However the culture of trading off in court who Gerrymanders who is not a viable strategy for the long term well being of our nation. It is simply a political party gaming the courts with the goal of grabbing power to hold power irregardless of the will of the people.
 
They don't control the 100 seats in the VA House of Representatives or the 40 seats of the VA Senate.

A political party cannot control the VA legislature by failing to contest 40 seats in the VA legislature, just can't be done.

The 2017 legislative elections in VA were blowback from the election of Trump. The Democrats flipped 15 seats of the VA House. As a result of the 2017 election the Republican party abandoned Virginia. These two events set the stage for the 2019 election.

Yep, some folks on these boards would start a civil war because their political party lost an election. To them i say this: Jump right out there and start your civil war, don't be surprised when you have few, if any, followers.

As for me, i lost too many relatives on the losing side of the last civil war.
I didn't read his post stating, "this is how revolutions begin" as a call for civil war.

Not even close.
 
Davidsog said:
The largest problem is the definition of a voting district varies so widely. It runs the gamut from adhering to existing administrative boundaries to including political homogeneity to political diversity. IMHO, the Supreme Court failed the American People in its job by not taking the opportunity to establish a single definition in Gill vs Whitford.

I'd suggest that the Supreme Court really fails where it attempts to adjudicate intra-state political disputes that are essentially non-justiciable.

majority opinion in Vieth said:
We conclude that neither Article I, §2, nor the Equal Protection Clause, nor (what appellants only fleetingly invoke) Article I, §4, provides a judicially enforceable limit on the political considerations that the States and Congress may take into account when districting.

https://www.oyez.org/cases/2003/02-1580

It's awful that the VA legislature has chosen to violate an incorporated federal right. I'd want to see any of those bills defeated, and if passed, stricken when challenged.

Having federal judges make state redistricting decisions based on criteria present in no constitutional text isn't a good way to defend the force of constitutional text.


Gerrymandering isn't the cause of these repellant proposed restrictions, but is an effect of democrat dominance of the state legislature when it mattered. Part of the problem of representative government is that it represents people with terrible ideas.
 
Last edited:
The problems in VA keep coming. Tomorrow, the house of public safety will hear several bad bills. If you can attend, please do so.

From VCDL:
As we warned a few days ago, HB 961, which bans "assault weapons", larger-capacity magazines, suppressors, and more, is up for a committee vote on Friday, February 7, at 8 am.

WE NEED TO STOP HB 961 AND THE OTHER FOUR GUN-CONTROL BILLS FROM MOVING FORWARD:

HB 264, removes getting CHP training from an NRA certified instructor! This will make finding training to get a CHP almost impossible and it will be expensive! It also bans online classes.

HB 600, requires those running family day-homes to lock up their guns, unloaded, with the ammunition locked up separately. Not even a CHP holder can have a loaded, concealed handgun on their person! Another "gun-free zone" that endangers everyone in that home.

HB 1288, takes away gun rights for various MISDEMEANORS.

HB 1499, creates the Virginia Gun Violence Intervention and Prevention Fund. Apparently the only violence that matters is violence that deals with guns.

ACTION ITEM: This is in a big meeting room - let's fill it up!

LOCATION:

General Assembly Building
House Committee Room
900 E Main St.
Richmond, VA 23219

(After passing through the metal detections, make an immediate left and go straight back, past the guard desk and through the glass doors. The meeting room will be on your right. Look for someone handing out GSL stickers.)

Firearms and other weapons are currently prohibited in the General Assembly Building. Folding knives with a metal blade that is less than 3-inches long are allowed.
 
Back
Top