People working at UPS have been known to steal (and they almost always get caught). But trust me, their more interested in snagging a newly released Harry Potter novel or the newest iphone to sell on the internet than trying to figure out if some random package might have a gun in it.
Just remember that Mr. Wesson also said:l98ster said:Mr Wesson,
THANK YOU!! I was waiting for someone to say what you said. UPS policy and what is legal are 2 different things. I had a number of FFL's including smith and Wesson themselves tell me to ship my guns UPS ground and do NOT declare what it is....
Mr. Wesson said:...and forfeit insurance....
Sorry, but I don't buy the logic. If they can figure out what random package has Harry Potter novels or iPhones, then they darned sure can figure out which packages have guns, and have done so in the past.
Sure, they "almost" always get caught, but that doesn't bring back many of the stolen goods.
When one fails to (1) disclose that the package contains a handgun (or a gun, if shipping FedEx); and (2) ships ground instead of overnight, he has violated the UPS or FedEx tariff. That is part of the contract of shipment. By violating the contract, the shipper lets the carrier off the hook on any insurance claim. So don't expect any coverage if your shipment is lost or damaged.
It might make some sense to assume the risk of loss of a $400 gun to save $60 on shipping. But if it's a $1,000 gun? It's up to you to draw your own line.
Where did you get that ridiculous idea? If you include the receive or frame, it's still a gun. The receiver or frame is the firearm under federal law.rbursek said:Or just take it apart abit, barrel off of a shot gun, bolt out of a rifle, and it is now gun parts not a firearm and ship it normal.
When one fails to (1) disclose that the package contains a handgun (or a gun, if shipping FedEx); and (2) ships ground instead of overnight, he has violated the UPS or FedEx tariff. That is part of the contract of shipment. By violating the contract, the shipper lets the carrier off the hook on any insurance claim. So don't expect any coverage if your shipment is lost or damaged.
It might make some sense to assume the risk of loss of a $400 gun to save $60 on shipping. But if it's a $1,000 gun? It's up to you to draw your own line.
Exactly my point I have sent guns back to S&W,Kel-tec and Phoenix arms this way but I would have serious second thoughts about sending a $1000+ firearm.
I also would look into addressing the package to a person at the company rather than the company's name.. if the front of the box says Smith and Wesson it doesn't take a genius to figure out a gun is probably in there.
In addition, Federal law requires that the carrier be notified that the shipment contains a firearm and prohibits common or contract carriers from requiring or causing any label to be placed on any package indicating that it contains a firearm.
I needed to send a revolver to the factory for work.
Wonder if they would have been willing to sell you a disassembled rifle, shotgun or handgun with out doing the 4473 or the background check--it's only parts, after all. Some FFLs are surprisingly ignorant of the laws dealing with their business.rbursek said:fiddletown,
a FFL licensed gun shop told me that when I needed to ship a rifle and shotgun to my son in CO from WI.
Bob
IMHO it's more precise to say that the FAQ is substantially dumbed down with respect to the written notice requirement.No it doesn't. (the feds' FAQ is wrong.) Look at the actual statutes.