Three More Wins for Gun Owners

Years ago, thanks to a "defector" it became common knowledge that Handgun Contol Inc was using anyone shot and killed under the age of 25 as their "death of a child due to a handgun" statistic.

This included suicides, murders, accidents, gang shootings, defensive shootings, people the police shot in the line of duty, anyone under 25 shot and killed in the US (with anything!) went into their database for that statistic.

Why should we expect anyone else with a similar agenda to be any more accurate (even if they do get govt funds)?

And even if its not the official policy of the agency to be anti gun, how do you know the people compiling the statistics don't have agenda's of their own?

Not many folks will, or can, check the "facts" touted by "reputable" organizations, those on our side, included...
 
CountZero:
I translate it as he reserves the right to use federal money to pay white house staffers to write up antigun bills and submit them to the congress, even though the Act bans the use of tax dollars to lobby & promote gun control. He could also do so in person as the paid chief executive if used the State of the Union address to do so. This is probably a legitimate position if you set aside the fact that gun control is uncostitutional.
It will be interesting to see if he stretches it to paying CDC to do antigun research for the executive office.
 
Move faster NRA to get Illinois on board with the rest of the Nation. The state is going broke and should not have money to fight these.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top