Thinnest grip double stack 9

Not having very large hands, the standard for feel and comfort has always been the single stack 1911.
But the Ruger SR series seems to come very close.
 
Anyone know how the CZ 75 RAMI BD compares to the other CZ variants/derivatives mentioned above?
Found a post on another forum caliming 1.25 at widest point, but that seeems extreme.
Click to expand...

Actually 1.25 doesn't sound so unrealistic. It is chunky for its size. Personally I like it a lot.

I was very interested in the Rami and came close to buying one earlier this year. Handling it side by side with the Compact I can't say the grips were and different in thickness width-wise but perhaps a little thinner front to back.
 
Actually the Browning BDM is the thinnest or darn closest to the thinnest. It was only made for a short time due to the 1994 AWB, and mag limitation.
 
M&P

I'd say the S&W M&P with the small backstrap as well. I have small hands and short fingers and it fits my hand like a glove. I can't imagine it would fit my hands very well if it wasn't thin.
 
Thats the way I see it. The 9E I have (SR9 in plainer guise) is considerably slimmer than my single stack P90 and P97 45s. At least thats the definite perception, I really haven't measured how much difference.

I don't see how Ruger got an 18 round 9MM to be or feel that slim in profile. The M&P also has a very good feel to it....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top