stephen426
New member
Some of you guys mention full-auto weapons as a red herring due to the NFA of 1934. If the NFA was never enacted and some of these shooters had access to full-auto weapons, do you believe the death toll would have been the same. For those of you that believe we should have access to any weapon that our military has, what do we do about organized groups of extremists that are able to pool their money to buy some serious fire power?
I was having a discussion with one of my friends about the right to own AR-15 type weapons. His argument was that the mass proliferation of these weapons greatly increases the likelihood that they will get in the wrong hands. I have never gone through the screening process for a FFL or owning NFA weapons so I don't know how stringent it really is. Since NFA weapons are almost never used in a crime, could we say that the screening has to be somewhat effective?
We are obviously gun enthusiasts or we wouldn't be on this site. If we don't try to be a part of the solution to curb mass shootings, the laws will change WITHOUT us.
I was having a discussion with one of my friends about the right to own AR-15 type weapons. His argument was that the mass proliferation of these weapons greatly increases the likelihood that they will get in the wrong hands. I have never gone through the screening process for a FFL or owning NFA weapons so I don't know how stringent it really is. Since NFA weapons are almost never used in a crime, could we say that the screening has to be somewhat effective?
We are obviously gun enthusiasts or we wouldn't be on this site. If we don't try to be a part of the solution to curb mass shootings, the laws will change WITHOUT us.