Scored a 10 even on the first one. Directly under Hillary. I'd at least liked to have been closer to Bill. Oh well.
Scored Centrist on the second one...right on the Liberal/Libertarian corner of Centrist, specifically.
Sounds about right, I'd say. The first poll/quiz was bunk, though. Some of the questions had no decent answer (team owners vs. players? WTF?) and others used wording that was obviously meant to slant answers. Some did both.
But I also don't think we should spend hardly any money on AIDS, or any other STD for that matter. There is already a 100% foolproof way to not get an STD. Don't have sex, and don't share needles, etc. It is entirely in one's control whether or not they get an STD.
Yeah, no. For one, people do still catch HIV/AIDS through non-sexual/non-drug-related means. It's uncommon, of course...but it can happen. Also, it's hard to blame somebody who catches HIV through a monogamous parter (
spouse, for instance). If your spouse cheats on you outside our knowledge, and catches something they can't throw back, is it your fault if they infect you as well? Is having an unprotected sexual relationship with a husband/wife
unreasonable?
That said, I'd still support more funding for heart disease and cancer over AIDS/HIV. AIDS/HIV is often contracted through poor choices (just didn't like you're "100%" statement), and both are about equally deadly, especially in the long run. Plenty of young people die of cancer, too.