gamboolman
Inactive
29, but i was honest to myself.
Test yourself and post your score...
- Thread starter Pointer
- Start date
Thunderhawk88
Moderator
Got a 29. About right, but I do think some of the questions needed more options.
29 here also.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Jack Kemp Jr. (born July 13, 1935) is an American politician and former professional American football player.
Kemp represented the Buffalo, New York region in the United States House of Representatives from 1971 to 1989. In 1988 he ran unsuccessfully for the Republican Presidential nomination, and subsequently served as the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development from 1989 to 1993 under President George H. W. Bush.
Kemp was the Republican Party's Vice Presidential nominee in 1996, running alongside Senator Bob Dole. Because Dole was a comparatively liberal Republican, running on his record of supporting government welfare programs, Kemp was seen as a means to attract conservative and libertarian-minded voters like those of tough nomination-challengers Steve Forbes and Pat Buchanan. As is usually the case with vice presidential nominees, this did not have as much impact as hoped.
-Paul
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Jack Kemp Jr. (born July 13, 1935) is an American politician and former professional American football player.
Kemp represented the Buffalo, New York region in the United States House of Representatives from 1971 to 1989. In 1988 he ran unsuccessfully for the Republican Presidential nomination, and subsequently served as the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development from 1989 to 1993 under President George H. W. Bush.
Kemp was the Republican Party's Vice Presidential nominee in 1996, running alongside Senator Bob Dole. Because Dole was a comparatively liberal Republican, running on his record of supporting government welfare programs, Kemp was seen as a means to attract conservative and libertarian-minded voters like those of tough nomination-challengers Steve Forbes and Pat Buchanan. As is usually the case with vice presidential nominees, this did not have as much impact as hoped.
-Paul
Mike Irwin
Staff
-12
Anyone care to join me in a rousing rendition of The International?
Anyone care to join me in a rousing rendition of The International?
HuntAndFish
New member
22. Just about in the middle, which is how I feel sometimes.
TexiCali Slim
New member
Wow
That test was crap I didn't even fill out 75% of the questions. but by seeing some people bragging I can see why us gun lovers have a bad name
That test was crap I didn't even fill out 75% of the questions. but by seeing some people bragging I can see why us gun lovers have a bad name
AZGunLover
New member
I got a 28
JuanCarlos
New member
Scored a 10 even on the first one. Directly under Hillary. I'd at least liked to have been closer to Bill. Oh well.
Scored Centrist on the second one...right on the Liberal/Libertarian corner of Centrist, specifically.
Sounds about right, I'd say. The first poll/quiz was bunk, though. Some of the questions had no decent answer (team owners vs. players? WTF?) and others used wording that was obviously meant to slant answers. Some did both.
Yeah, no. For one, people do still catch HIV/AIDS through non-sexual/non-drug-related means. It's uncommon, of course...but it can happen. Also, it's hard to blame somebody who catches HIV through a monogamous parter (spouse, for instance). If your spouse cheats on you outside our knowledge, and catches something they can't throw back, is it your fault if they infect you as well? Is having an unprotected sexual relationship with a husband/wife unreasonable?
That said, I'd still support more funding for heart disease and cancer over AIDS/HIV. AIDS/HIV is often contracted through poor choices (just didn't like you're "100%" statement), and both are about equally deadly, especially in the long run. Plenty of young people die of cancer, too.
Scored Centrist on the second one...right on the Liberal/Libertarian corner of Centrist, specifically.
Sounds about right, I'd say. The first poll/quiz was bunk, though. Some of the questions had no decent answer (team owners vs. players? WTF?) and others used wording that was obviously meant to slant answers. Some did both.
Yeah, no. For one, people do still catch HIV/AIDS through non-sexual/non-drug-related means. It's uncommon, of course...but it can happen. Also, it's hard to blame somebody who catches HIV through a monogamous parter (spouse, for instance). If your spouse cheats on you outside our knowledge, and catches something they can't throw back, is it your fault if they infect you as well? Is having an unprotected sexual relationship with a husband/wife unreasonable?
That said, I'd still support more funding for heart disease and cancer over AIDS/HIV. AIDS/HIV is often contracted through poor choices (just didn't like you're "100%" statement), and both are about equally deadly, especially in the long run. Plenty of young people die of cancer, too.
31 but i wasn't try to slant my answers. last month i drove from the east coast to the west coast, and i never realized what a beautiful country. i have always been patriotic but damn this is a great country. i think we ought to get out and see more of the country! sorry about my rant , i don't feel conservative or liberal but American.