OneFreeTexan
New member
In the recent issue of American Rifleman,John Treakle, states the ‘glock’ system of striker is safer because the striker is only partially held, or loaded as he puts it.lHe claims that fully spring loaded strikers are inherently more dangerous, and liable for accidental discharge. He glosses over the fact that often a fully loaded striker has a lower trigger pull. He claims wil the partially loaded striker the trigger movement is comparable to that of a double action revolver.
Is a fully loaded striker that dangerous??
Is a fully loaded striker that dangerous??