stopping power statistics

Oh, sure guys. Thanks a lot.

We neatly dodge the can of gasoline & lighted match when someone starts a thread about stopping power, but that's not good enough for us. No, not by a long shot. Instead we're out shopping for Molotov Cocktails and resurrecting the old Glocks vs 1911s debate ... :D :D

<moderator hat on>

No more thread veer, please. If you want to argue about 1911 vs Glock, go do that over in the Handgun Forum. I'm sure the moderators there will appreciate it.

</moderator hat off>

:D Now, where were we? Ahh, yes. Back to the peaceful and quiet and calm discussion of stopping power.

;)

pax
 
No more thread veer, please. If you want to argue about 1911 vs Glock, go do that over in the Handgun Forum. I'm sure the moderators there will appreciate it.
Click to expand...
Dunno about Mal, but it's definitely what I live for... :D :D
 
What happens to a human being when they are hit with a bullet 9 times out of 10? Do they continue moving towards you? My bet is they will dive for cover or attempt evasive action if they are not killed. How many targets will continue towards you at a high rate of speed if hit with 2-3 bullets? Even if the hits were in the legs or arms, what are the chances they will continue?

Some may point out examples like the Miami shooting, but Im willing to bet those are anomalies caused by a highly motivated and well trained aggressor under unusual circumstances.

A few bullets of any caliber will do some damage and I can bet the target isnt going to be moving quite as fast once hit with a few bullets of any caliber.

However, I will take the .45 for home defense;)
 
The whole point of “stopping power” is to STOP the BG from doing what he’s doing. If he falls down and dies, fine. If he runs away, fine. If he drops his gun and screams “No mas!!”, fine.

The point is to effect a “channel change” ASAP. Get him off the ATTACK channel and onto the GOTTA GET TO THE ER channel.
Handgun calibers are notoriously ineffective at doing this.
It’s logical that .41 and .44 magnums should work better than .45ACP, .40 S&W and hot 9mm loads, but the bad guys have their own logic. Even 12 ga buckshot and slugs don’t always work on the first try.

Shoot to lockback or until you no longer have a target.

You'll know you no longer have a target when you lose sight of the BG and find him on the ground, not moving.

In the entire history of gunfighting, there has never been a case where one of the shooters wished he had a smaller gun that held fewer rounds of less powerful ammo.
 
JohnH1963 said:
What happens to a human being when they are hit with a bullet 9 times out of 10? Do they continue moving towards you? My bet is they will dive for cover or attempt evasive action if they are not killed. How many targets will continue towards you at a high rate of speed if hit with 2-3 bullets? Even if the hits were in the legs or arms, what are the chances they will continue?
Click to expand...

Did you see Tamara's post?

Tamara said:
1) Every gunshot wound is a unique occurrence.
2) Every gunfight is a unique occurrence.
Click to expand...

The truth is no one knows the answers to the questions you posed. We all like to hope that an attacker would stop after being shot, but we can't count on it. So no matter how much reading, speculating, bullet testing and target practice we do, we will never know for certain how a shooting incident will turn out till it actually happens.

That was the long winded version of...

1) Every gunshot wound is a unique occurrence.
2) Every gunfight is a unique occurrence.
:)
 
In the entire history of gunfighting, there has never been a case where one of the shooters wished he had a smaller gun that held fewer rounds of less powerful ammo.
Click to expand...
I betcha that when the GG finds his gun in the hands of the BG, he wishes he had a gun that held fewer rounds and less powerful ammo... That's a whole 'nother discussion right there, but think about this: what would you rather be shot with?

Pros and cons for any bullet out there, and everyone has their own opinion. There cant really be "one right" caliber, just the one "right" caliber for any one person. For me, its the .40. Manageable and still some power behind it as well as decent magazine capacity. Some people cant handle the .40 (or .45 for that matter) without training more than they already do...

For what its worth, my dad's friend who recently retired 26years as a Delta operative said he loved the 9mm for defense and .45 for offense. And he always says shot placement trumps stopping power. But he gets paid to practice, most of us dont, so take it for what you will...
 
I think his comments also reflect the fervent loyalty many LEO’s have for their 1911. The LEO’s I talk to aren’t being funny when they argue the merits of their favorite firearm vs. a 9mm.
Click to expand...

Ok, good enough, but I suspect the rest of them don't attribute the effectiveness to the loud noise and flash. The caliber actually does work, and I doubt a silenced weapon would be less effective.

Personally, I don't think I'd be less scared if shot at with a 9mm, and probably wouldn't be inclined to assess what specific caliber Bubba was trying to murder me with.

On the other hand, I have no evidence that loud noise and flash have no effect, either. Maybe there's someone out there who's survived being shot at enough times with different calibers and could enlighten us.
 
One fine day, I was at the target end of an open 100 yd. range, putting up a few targets. Out of nowhere, bullets started impacting very near me! I jumped behind a berm, and watched to see if the shooter was going to cease. If anything, the hits were getting closer. I mean within 5 feet of me, so he was obviously not shooting at anything in his lane.
I was carrying my P-85, loaded with 8 gr. of Blue Dot and the 124 gr. XTP over a Rem benchrest rifle primer. He was in his van, shooting an AR on a bipod, but there was a concrete bench right in front of him. I laid a full 18 round mag into that bench. That load does make lotsa' bang and big fire, and those bullets were smacking the concrete with authority. He didn't assess my load, but made hasty tracks.
Big noise and flash is good. Accuracy is good. Not having to kill the moron is good. 9mm is good, but ONLY when you work your loads out to the potential of the round, in a gun that can handle it.
 
Many things have contributed to the misinterpretation of stopping power as some kind of black science- which it is not. I think if we can establish rational guidelines about what we need to accomplish, we can draw rational conclusions about the appropriate tools for the job. We are also going to dispense with a supposedly `key' concept which has contributed very little to our understanding of this subject- and can get you killed, if you rely on it to the exclusion of everything else.
Click to expand...

http://www.thesixgunjournal.net/stoppingpower.html
 
I gave up long ago trying to find the "magic" bullet and settled for one that is indicated by where the graph lines meet. Kind of what my department did in picking a round, actually four in 9mm to .45. I have seen two people DRT from chest and neck wounds from 2" barreled junk revolver .22 LR's and two (one just last month) take .44 magnums from four inch barrelled revolvers to the chest and live. Point? You pays your money and takes your chances if you carry. You may make it with what you have and you may not. I go with Tam on this, what you have may depending on a myriod of factors leave you breathing "this time" and work like a water pistol next time. Welcome the the real world my friends...:cool:

Jeez Sarge do you ever sleep??
 
Last edited:
Why wouldnt a department let the officer choose what caliber they feel most comfortable with...I mean the main calibers (9 mm, 10 mm, .45, .40, 357 sig).

For example, Officer A may do better with a .45 where as Officer B might do better with a 9...
 
^

Some do. Mine lets you have a 9mm, .40 or .45.....as long as its a Glock.
Others on the Left Coast let you pick one of the three but buy your own gun out of a list of approved...differs by area and politics.:eek:
 
Some may point out examples like the Miami shooting, but Im willing to bet those are anomalies caused by a highly motivated and well trained aggressor under unusual circumstances.

A few bullets of any caliber will do some damage and I can bet the target isnt going to be moving quite as fast once hit with a few bullets of any caliber.
Click to expand...

There are so many incidents of individuals continuing to function after being shot, stabbed, bombed, concussed, flamed, spindled, mutilated and/or folded that the incidents cease to be anomalies and become statistically significant. That's why you continue shooting until the threat stops, because said threat may not realize that he or she has been shot.
 
Some do. Mine lets you have a 9mm, .40 or .45.....as long as its a Glock.
Others on the Left Coast let you pick one of the three but buy your own gun out of a list of approved...differs by area and politics.
Click to expand...
Is that SPD?
 
Ah what is it? I have questions for you! I think I want to try and get into that field but right now I am forcing myself to go to school at CWU in ellensburg. Perhaps I will PM you soon.
 
my local police issue hkusp45s, but the detectives carry 9s since they dont want a big heavy gun they'll never use. In portland the officers carry mostly a S&W .45, dont know what type, 8 round mags i know from reading a shooting report, but i saw an older officer with a .357. Most officers pick department issue to share ammo and the such but will adapt to needs of job or what they feel best with. I dont mind recoil, i find mausers to be a delightful plinker, so i think i may go with .45
 
The results in the M&S charts only covered shootings in which the perp ceased hostilities after being struck by one round. This does not mean that he was killed or even incapacitated. Just stopped. The problem I have with the M&S charts is the way the data was collected/excluded. The new generation of bullet designs would most likely change the results if the data were collected today.

I have been hearing about these "Strasbough Test" for years and after reading it I suspect it never happened. The report is lacking in medical results and reads more like it was written by a SF writer.

I see no need to squabble over calibers. I may carry a .380, 9mm, 40S&W, or .45 ACP depending on my mood and don't feel undergunned with any of them.

My intentions are to shoot to stop and see no reason to get stingy with the rounds.

The opinions above are mine and mine alone.

Dallas Jack
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top