This "I am not required to inform" with the aggressive tone is one of the problems with the zealots on our side.
I have no idea what you are implying here. What justification you have to call me a "zealot" is quite beyond me. I'm a zealot because I tell people to follow the law? I could call you names as well in response, but that really wouldn't add any light to the conversation, now would it?
I think that you should be required to inform LEOs as to your CCW status when being stopped/interviewed.
What you or I think the law should be is immaterial. The law is what it is. Some states require notification. Some do not. I obey the law and urge others to do so. I do not notify if the law does not require me to. You can urge the IL legislature to require notification. Oh, wait, IL does not allow concealed carry at all
I follow the recommendation of Massad Ayoob, who, for many years, was a reserve police officer in a small force in NH. He's done many traffic stops himself. NH does not require notification.
There is no reason not to inform other than alienating the LEO.
Complete and utter BS. Did you even bother to
READ what I wrote?
If I am properly carrying, during a normal traffic stop the officer will never see my handgun. That is what happened when I was stopped for speeding a couple years ago. I was speeding. I handed over my license and registration, and apologized to the officer for being inattentive about my speed. I was getting ready to go on vacation, buying last minute items, and wasn't paying attention, and I told the officer that. The 3 surf rods on the top of my truck attested to that fact. He took my license and registration, went back to his cruiser, and gave me a written warning. I apologized again and went on my way. I still think about that officer and thank him for the break he gave me -- a ticket would have been a sucky way to start a vacation.
The officer never asked whether I was carrying and I didn't offered. Under MA law, I am not required to do so. I don't have a problem with police officers. I'm not saying they are bad and I'm good.
As I have posted previously, not all MA police officers respect the right of citizens to carry. Many do. Probably most do. But some do not. And I do know someone who was stopped for a minor traffic violation, notified the officer, and then was facing the business end of a .40 Glock with the young officer screaming at him. Someone alienated someone else during the confrontation, but it wasn't the motorist.
If he had not notified the officer, he would have been on his way with a ticket in just a few minutes. Instead, he was taken from the car at gun point, proned out on the pavement, handcuffed, stuffed in the cruiser, and spent 45 minutes back there until the officer turned him lose with a traffic ticket. Is that the norm here? No, but it has happened here in MA. That is why I don't inform.
A fellow that I know was previously a police officer in MA. He recommends against notifying here in MA for precisely the reason stated above.
You have never dealt with law abiding citizens carrying concealed, and it is apparent from your response that you just haven't thought through the issue. My recommendation against notifying the officer has absolutely nothing to do with "alienating" the officer. If the officer needs to know about it -- if he's going to take me out of the car and thus frisk me -- I'll tell him. If he's just going to give me a traffic ticket, I'm not going to volunteer.