SIG 228 v. CZ 75

Poor Richard's Almanac

ddt4free, if your eyes, hands, and tastes run to the stock CZ products so much the better for you. At that point you are able to shoot a pistol at a very reasonable price. If your taste runs to the very tiny sights and even smaller white dots on the original CZ75 pistols you are again in luck. If your hands are accustomed to the rich feel of the plastic factory grips you are in fat city.

I work hard and have the money to alter things to my tastes and I do not consider upgrading a pistol to be a sin. If these changes are sinful will you be the one to tell the custom gunsmiths across the USA? Richard
 
Good deal Rob96,

You are exactly right; and all else can be taken in stride.:D Sig's are a bit pricey; I once had
a Browning Hi-Power that quite frankly rivaled
the Sig for accuracy. And I got it at a bargain
basement price; $399.88 + 8% sales tax, out the
door. It was the "Practical Model" in 9m/m. I
guess that just goes too show us that there is
a lot of great firearms out there; abeit some
are more expensive than other's, but that doesn't
make'em shoot a bit better.:)

Sorry, to hear about your hand surgery my friend.
Wishing you the very best, and a speedy recovery,:)

Your Friend,
Ala Dan, N.R.A. Life Member
 
I went with 75B over 226/228 for two reasons: cocked and locked capability and better (for me) grip. If you prefer decocker instead of cocked and locked, go with 228. Sights seem close, CZ magazines are cheaper but not by much. Build quality seems very high on both. CZ75B DA pull isn't great but it is an afterthought: C&L is the intended mode of operation.
 
Yes, I always carry my CZ cocked and locked. Why mess with a long DA pull when you don't have too? C&L is, I think, one of the best points of the CZ's.
jump.gif
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top