glockorama
New member
Richard:
That is strange. CZ-75's have always been known for thier smooth trigger pull, granted, the addition of the firing block seems to have compromised that in some guns. I have had a CZ-75 and 2 CZ-75b's and the trigger pull on all three guns has been perfect. Light, crisp, and smooth. They are definitely WAY better than any of the sigs I own(ed). I have never liked the sig double action pull, it is heavier that the CZ and breaks at a wierd time (for me), I also hate the sluggish way the trigger returns after firing. I agree with you about the sights, I give sig's the nod there, but, since I put night sights on my guns, it is a moot point to me. Again, this is all personal taste. I find the CZ points and shoots (less muzzle flip, etc.) better than the sig. I can shoot faster and more accurately with the CZ, and in a critical situation, that's all that counts. Also, CZ's can be carried DA or cocked and locked. You can have the best of both worlds with a CZ. So , if I had to put a "superior" tag on one, I would say the CZ. (It's also half the price of a sig.)the trigger pull of the Sig P228 in either single or double action is out of the class of any CZ75 I own or I have shot.
Last edited: