Gentlemen: Attack using the law. We need to get a ruling on the Second Amendment , and to file suit on the concept that regulations on the parts of "arms" as noted in the Bill of Rights , is the same infringement as of the "arms" themselves.
Our founding fathers didn't say that you may keep and bear arms , only if they are not ugly, or have bayonets, or flash suppressors , nor did they say you may only carry 10 musket balls in your cartridge belt.
They have no possible right to limit the capacity of the arm, for that limits the ultility of the the arm , functionally limiting the Right itself.
You all do realize that part of the military purpose for flash suppressors was to serve as a muzzle protector from mud and dirt when the soldiers "hit the dirt"... so by limiting them , they render our firearms less battle worthy that those of the government.
The limits of mag capacity is obvious !
------------------
What part of "INFRINGED" don't they understand?
Our founding fathers didn't say that you may keep and bear arms , only if they are not ugly, or have bayonets, or flash suppressors , nor did they say you may only carry 10 musket balls in your cartridge belt.
They have no possible right to limit the capacity of the arm, for that limits the ultility of the the arm , functionally limiting the Right itself.
You all do realize that part of the military purpose for flash suppressors was to serve as a muzzle protector from mud and dirt when the soldiers "hit the dirt"... so by limiting them , they render our firearms less battle worthy that those of the government.
The limits of mag capacity is obvious !
------------------
What part of "INFRINGED" don't they understand?