Seems John Kerry will run again in 2008.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Well if the Dems really want to lose, they will nominate Kerry, Hillary or Gore. The three of them put together couldn't form a likable person.
 
No, his running doesn't mean that Hillary won't. It means they'll both, along with others, go through the primary process which will determine the Democratic candidate. :rolleyes:

"I don't even want to THINK about what they're not teaching in school these days." (Tom Hanks, which I'm borrowing for this thread).

Springmom
 
John "flip flop" Kerry
Click to expand...

Does that mean that Bush is a flip flopper?

"We dont have any secret prisons"

Then all of a sudden yes we did have secret prisons.

Wait a minute thats lying not flip flopping.

beg your pardon
 
Vendetta, thanks, that skit was funny. One guy sounds like Bush & the other looks like Kerry.

My favorite quote from it.:
"We got rid rid of that evil doer, Saddam, and showed the rest of the world and America that we can fight back, showed that America is like the "New Texas" - We'll kick your ass.

Other favorite quote:
From Kerry to bush.
"I just realized why America loves you so much. It's like loving a retarded baby".
 
Great ... now we'll get to see how the other side of the Skull and Bones coin operates.

I can't believe more people don't see clearly what's happening.

:cool:
 
Make no mistake---Hillary WILL be the Democratic nominee. Kerry running changes nothing. All the current polls have Hillary as winning the Democratic candiate. The only people she is shown in the polls losing out to is Guiliani by a good margin and McCain by a narrow margin. That's it, get used to the idea. So who's it going to be? Hillary, McCain or Rudi. If you don't vote, or vote 3rd party---that's your right, BUT if the 1 you want NOT to win does---then you are also partly to blame, keep that in mind.:(
 
Hmmm...Kerry...wasn't he the one who had his picture up in the North Vietnamese museum celebrating those who helped them win the war? Didn't he vote against the 1st Gulf War, despite it meeting EVERY one of his more-recently stated conditions (world approval, UN backing, yada yada yada)? Didn't he say he would send more troops to Iraq, even as he was calling it the wrong war at the wrong time...(a real "follow me" type of guy...)?

Yeah - THAT'S the guy i want running this country at a time of war, Kooks w/nukes, islamic extremists, etc.

Like most of these elitists, he should have spent less time yachting with the kennedys while growing up and more time learning what things were like in the real world.
 
I don't like John "McKennedy". I'd look for Sen. Bill Frist. Or someone else I hope. I liked George W. and voted for George W. He pretty much let me down though. I know Kerry wouldn't have done any better.
 
I agree on this...

Great ... now we'll get to see how the other side of the Skull and Bones coin operates.

I can't believe more people don't see clearly what's happening.
Click to expand...

Interesting notion.


Epyon
 
Does that mean that Bush is a flip flopper?

"We dont have any secret prisons"

Then all of a sudden yes we did have secret prisons.

Wait a minute thats lying not flip flopping.

beg your pardon
______________________________________

It's okay to fudge the truth in time of war. Every president has done it and it smart not to put all of your cards on the table. Lying is okay when you're playing poker too. Lots of allowable exceptions. You could look it up.

John
 
"We dont have any secret prisons"

Then all of a sudden yes we did have secret prisons.
Click to expand...


Yeah, what is doing, he should have told them right away that we had "secret" prisons.:rolleyes: Then he should have told them where these "secret" prisons were.;) In fact, any question that is asked of him, he should just tell them everything they would like to know.:confused:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top