Scenario: Unarmed assailant advancing

You better believe you are on fairly shaky legal ground. You just committed a felony. If you shoot you just committed murder.
Click to expand...

Zincwarrior, you really are caught up in this mentality, aren't you?

I think you are not accurate in this way of thinking. Not all cases are the same, and not all cases are an immediate undertaking of a crime. In the OP there is the element of being attacked, again.

If it was a crime every time someone pulled a gun from a holster we'd be operating under a whole different set of circumstances with regard to being able to carry guns at all.
 
I would run away, perpendicular to his approach vector if possible. If he then follows, he is not after a light. Retreat accompanied by further pursuit is one of the best indicators of the necessity to defend.

Also watch is eyes. If he suddenly looks side to side while closing, he trying to determine to what extent he is being watched by potential witnesses. It's a known indicator a predatory individual is about to strike his target.
 
What about a warning shot?

This is a scenario fraught with ambiguity and confusion (not that it wouldn't be exactly so in real life).

I'm wondering if a warning shot might prove useful? If the person ignores verbal challenges and continues to advance? I'm thinking of a warning shot as an alternative to drawing and aiming at the person.

My understanding of armed citizen SD doctrine is that a warning shot has no place. But, just like a tree falling in the forest, would a warning shot be a bad move when there's only you and the "threat" to hear it?
 
One would think that when the advancing person saw a handgun being pulled and pointed at him/her and they have/had NO ILL intension's they would stop in there tracks (no more advancement). If they do not stop advancing while having a handgun pointed at them that tells me and this is my opinion that they ILL INTENSION'S toward me. Time to shoot.
 
Only thing is, what justified drawing down in the first place? As described in the OP's scenario, the stranger's actions are not directly threatening. Weird, maybe, but probably not enough to justify the draw, let alone a shooting.

Learn body language, both how to read and how to project. Learn some physical contact skills. Learn your local SD laws.
 
Tough question and in the event the would be assailant is killed as described by the OP, could go either way.

First, I would be trying to communicate with the encroacher long before he reached a 7 yard range. Then I think Don has the best advice. If the person breaks the 7 yard bubble, the firearm comes out and if he continues after that, a trigger press in in order.

Now that is all presuming that you are in fear for your life because that is the test in Missouri. If you are defending your life, you are within your rights to fire.
 
Quote:
You better believe you are on fairly shaky legal ground. You just committed a felony. If you shoot you just committed murder.

Zincwarrior, you really are caught up in this mentality, aren't you?

I think you are not accurate in this way of thinking. Not all cases are the same, and not all cases are an immediate undertaking of a crime. In the OP there is the element of being attacked, again.

If it was a crime every time someone pulled a gun from a holster we'd be operating under a whole different set of circumstances with regard to being able to carry guns at all.
Click to expand...

I don't think you understandhow the law functions in this instance. IT IS A CRIME.

You may have a legitimate defense to the crime, but it is a crime.

In this circumstance, you don't have a legitimate defense. On the limited story board here, no court of law will say you were reasonably in fear of life or severe harm. To the hoosegow with you! Barney lock him up. :p
 
If displaying my handgun doesn't stop his approach, I would wait until he pulls a weapon or makes a move to physically attack me. Pretty simple really.
 
1 off shore around here usually means the Atlantic can't walk there.
2 you are open carry do nothing ask him "can I help you?"
3 you might just be on his land and it's posted.
4 Finally if you draw at any time on a defenseless person you are in the wrong, if on the other hand you know this guy is 6'10" and is a professional fighter ask him what he wants before you do anything but put you hand on your gun and be ready.

As for me I do not open carry unless I am on my land, or in uniform.
Mace
 
Mentally note avenues of escape.
Slight lateral movement if possible to see if they track with you.
Upheld hand with palm outward is a fairly universal signal to stop.
Command of "Whoa thar hoss!" reinforces hand signal. Back away.
If the person's actions appeared to be projecting a threat, I think release of retaining device and getting a good grip on the weapon will telegraph your intent to react/resist without the necessity of actually needing to draw.
The open carry works for you in this scenario. There may be one, but I don’t know of any law against preparing by getting a grip on your weapon. I think it’s when the weapon is drawn that things get dicey.
I can’t subscribe to the Hollywood mentality that one needs to wave a weapon to let you know they mean business or they’re serious. A defense stance and grip on a weapon should suffice. The last time I started getting out of my vehicle and the LEO responded with a command and grabbed his pistol grip, he had my undivided attention. (I miss the old days when you met law enforcement officer at the rear of your car to discuss why his patrol car’s lights are flashing.)
If after all this, you feel compelled to draw your weapon, you must understand you’ve crossed the Rubicon.
 
The offshore adds a different element. Was the walkup person already in the water? On land, but entered the water? Was the offshore part there to limit the potential avenues of escape?

If I’m sure I’m not trespassing, the approaching cat better have a fishing pole. :D

Oh, wait a minute. If I was trying to get close, I'd have a pole to throw you off scent. :eek:
 
mavracer
secret_agent_man said:
The deaf mute has a cell phone
Click to expand...
gotta know why on god's green earth you think a deaf mute is gonna have a cell phone.
Click to expand...
I'd imagine that to a deaf-mute, the ability to send text messages might be, um, life-changing. Even face to face, what a boon to communication that would be.

serf 'rett said:
Mentally note avenues of escape.
Slight lateral movement if possible to see if they track with you.
Upheld hand with palm outward is a fairly universal signal to stop.
Command of "Whoa thar hoss!" reinforces hand signal. Back away.
Click to expand...
All of the above.

And the OP was also asking about what his girlfriend should do in a situation like this. There's going to be a legitimate disparity-of-force issue pretty much any time a woman is confronted by an unarmed attacker. The general size and strength difference between men and women means that any adult male is a potential lethal threat, armed or not.

As a woman, if I've retreated from an advancing male, asked him what he wants, told him to stop both verbally and with gestures, and he keeps on coming... am I now reasonably in fear of my life? Yes. In an isolated place in the mountains, I'm probably carrying bear spray rather than a gun, and I'd have no hesitation about using it and getting the hell away. If I am carrying a gun -- which I would be if I were traveling alone -- that's the backup to the bear spray, and I'll draw and use it if the gentleman turns out to be one of those psychotic, PCP-addled deaf-mutes on whom bear spray has no effect. :eek:
 
Cracked91,

I strongly suggest, that before you ever go on a fishing trip or a hike or a camping trip, you take a course or three in armed self defense, including instruction on how to judge a situation and how to react properly before needing to draw and possibly fire your weapon. The scenario as described by you is very indicative that you are unaware of how to properly react and then act once such a situation may arise and that you do not even know what signs to look for that an attack may be imminent and therefore you would testify, in essence, against yourself if you ever went to trial and decided to take the stand. Just to have drawn your gun because someone walked up to within 21 feet of you, without you doing anything else to take precautions and to avoid trouble, except telling him to stop, is very telling that you are not knowledgeable enough about: self defense, the legality of when you may threaten someone with deadly force, what to do if you perceive a threat, what constitutes a potential threat, how to describe the threat, how to react to a threat, how to change reaction into action, and by extension - when you can use deadly force.

Sure, in the scenario as first described, you should have your hackles up but draw your gun? There were a lot of other things you could have and should have done had you been in a situation like that before drawing a firearm. Commanding someone to stop may be one of them, but why didn't the person in your made up scenario move to safety, move to put cover between himself and the other person, describe what else about the guy such as height, weight, actions such as avoiding eye contact but always watching your hands and your gun (before you drew), crouching a bit as walking as if stalking you, clenched fist or clenching and opening and clenching again, long steps, or short very determined steps, walking quietly even though the ground was littered with dry twigs and other debris, hands up in a ready to fight position as opposed to him with hands folded twiddling his thumbs, what he did when you moved (if you moved did he adjust to keep coming at you), what he did when you started to walk away faster (if you did walk away faster, did he speed up).

Your scenario is seemingly that of a scared person, a very scared person who thinks the gun is the answer to everything as you described. The fact is, as others have mentioned, there could be many reasons this guy was approaching you other than with nefarious intent. For you to think up such a situation and for you to allow the scenario to develop to the point that it did, without the person who felt endangered first having made numerous other observations and assessments and without that person having taken appropriate other actions before drawing, shows me that you are ill prepared to be in such a situation. That may sound harsh but the reality is based upon what you have told us and if that is truly the way you think, I believe you need to get a better education about being an armed citizen than you could do at this forum. I also base my assessment upon well over 30 years of carrying a firearm for self defense, several training courses I have taken, several articles I have read by experts in the field of firearms and self defense, several real life situations I have read about in the news, situations I have winessed first hand, situations that have arisen both on and off my job, having been in several situations wherein I realized I was in danger, having also been in situations where I realized I was not only in some type of possible danger but that I was about to be seriously harmed or possibly killed if I did not act properly, having been in several situations where I had to fight actually to protect myself - including using weapons to defend myself, and including once having to shoot someone. Based on all that and what I can assess of your mindset as evidenced by your scenario, and your follow-up post, I strongly recommend you take some good self defense with firearms courses, or that at least you read some good self defense with firearms books, ones that cover the basics of how to recognize danger, how to avoid it if possible, if not then how to react to it, whether or not you should go to your gun or something else first, how to act to take control of the situation legally and safely.

All the best,
Glenn B
Click to expand...

Glenn, I am confident in my own abilities to judge and react to situations.
I took 2 years of law enforcement at a vocational school (4 hours a day) during high school. Our instructor being a former Marine and Sheriffs deputy, and an active CCW intructor, he loved to run us through shoot/no shoot situations (though we were normally role playing as officers). The toughest one to call was always getting beat down by someone, or multiples, fists alone.

And the OP was also asking about what his girlfriend should do in a situation like this. There's going to be a legitimate disparity-of-force issue pretty much any time a woman is confronted by an unarmed attacker. The general size and strength difference between men and women means that any adult male is a potential lethal threat, armed or not.
Click to expand...

Thank you!! That seems to be an area where there is alot of confusion here.
This scenario does not concern me about my own safety for many reasons, the first being that I am never alone in the deep woods, and that I can handle myself very well in a physical confrontation, but was one that concerned/interested me about my weaker/female friends and relatives.

For the sake of the argument, lets say the assailant has a major physical advantage on you. As in if he could get his hand around part of your weapon, he could wrench it out of your fingers easily. His body language and approach speed indicate aggression, but his face remains cool and collected, maybe even smiling. You have made eye contact. You have already attempted to speak in a polite way, ignored, then in a commanding tone, with gestures, as he gets too close, ignored.

I think Vanya's option of bear spray is the best bet. Anything else seems to have a high level of risk attached.
 
quote from mavracer

Why on earth would a deaf mute have a cell phone?
Click to expand...


Well they have these things called smart phones. They usethem to send text messages with. Also they have a TTY mode on them so a deaf person can use them with a TTY (Phone for the deaf) some of the newer ones fold up and will fit in a pocket.

I have several family members that are deaf, my hearing is not too good these days either.

Now to awnser the question I am in the camp of sounds like I would have my pepper spray out. I carry it mainly for dogs, though in this case it would work. It may be considered assault. I would rather be in court explaining why I sprayed some one with pepper spray, rather than for shooting them.
 
Scenario : You are fishing off the shore at an isolated lake in the mountains, in the distance you see a man approaching you. You are openly carrying. He has no apparent weapons, and is walking rapidly, but not in a necessarily threatening manner. As he gets close to you, you turn to face him, and he continues approaching, closing in closer than 7 yards. You tell him to stop, he continues approaching, as if he did not hear you. You draw your weapon and point it at him while yelling at him to stop. He continues approaching.
Click to expand...

You hesitate because you don't want to go to jail for murder and THATS when the zombie lurches forward and you are lunch! :D
 
I don't think you understandhow the law functions in this instance. IT IS A CRIME.

You may have a legitimate defense to the crime, but it is a crime.

In this circumstance, you don't have a legitimate defense. On the limited story board here, no court of law will say you were reasonably in fear of life or severe harm.
Click to expand...

You're out alone. Someone is coming at you and has ignored your warnings, and keeps coming at you. You are in fear of attack. That means you are in fear of great bodily harm or death.

Are you supposed to let them come all the way to you, then batter you? Let them stab you with the knife they could pull out?

Have you done any reading on the Tueller scenario?

I will not risk someone laying hands on me in that type of situation. I will not allow myself to be battered before I attempt to defend myself.

AFA the bolded part- are you so absolutely sure about that? I'm not.
 
I will not risk someone laying hands on me in that type of situation. I will not allow myself to be battered before I attempt to defend myself.

AFA the bolded part- are you so absolutely sure about that? I'm not.
Click to expand...

1. Yep I am.
2. Remember you have to prove what you did is correct. the presumption is you're guilty and going for the long walk. They've proven their case at this point.

You're alone, except you're by a lake. Likely there are other fishermen there or coming there. But under this mantra the fisherman who sets down next to you is going to get shot. Really? Unless he owns the land he has no presumption some stranger is not going to plump right down next to him.

Thats my view and its the correct one for my jurisdiction. Yours may differ and thats fine.
 
You're alone, except you're by a lake. Likely there are other fishermen there or coming there. But under this mantra the fisherman who sets down next to you is going to get shot. Really? Unless he owns the land he has no presumption some stranger is not going to plump right down next to him.
Click to expand...

Not the scenario I described at all, but thats okay.

I would like to thank those who given their best advice to the actual situation I presented, and not labeled me as a person who is just looking for an excuse to shoot joggers.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top