S&W Model 10's and a comment

SaxonPig, as I mentioned the last time we debated the issue, you need to double check your pressure figures because they're incorrect. If you look at page 4 of the following document (which was published by SAAMI themselves and linked directly from their website) you will find that the MAP (maximum average pressure) for all standard pressure .38 Special loadings is 17,000psi and the MAP for all .38 Spl +P loadings is 20,000psi. The 21,500psi you continue to erroneously quote would, in fact, be a +P+ loading.

http://saami.org/specifications_and_information/specifications/Velocity_Pressure_CfPR.pdf

Also, you continue to treat the SAAMI pressure specs as though they're minimum pressures when, in fact, they are maximums. If we take your word that most factory .38 Spl +P ammo is loaded to 18,000psi, then we can conclude that because it is above the 17,000psi maximum for standard pressure but below the 20,000psi max for +P, it is exactly what it's been advertised as. You seem to fail to grasp that the SAAMI +P designation is about pressure and not velocity. Any .38 Special loading with a MAP from 17,001psi to 20,000psi is, by definition, .38 Spl +P while any .38 Spl loading with a MAP from 1psi to 17,000psi is, by definition, standard pressure.

You also seem to erroneously believe that peak pressure and velocity directly correlate, they don't. High velocities are achieved by selecting the powder which will reach and maintain peak pressure at the optimum rate for a given bullet weight and barrel length. For example, a fast-burning powder which reaches its peak pressure quickly would give the higher velocity for a light bullet and/or short barrel. However, a slow-burning powder which maintains its peak pressure longer would give higher velocity for a heavy bullet and/or long barrel.

One needs only look at the velocity and pressure specs listed in a reloading manual to learn that higher velocity can sometimes be achieved at lower peak pressure depending on the bullet and barrel length. One of the ways that boutique ammo makers like Buffalo Bore can achieve surprisingly high velocity while still remaining within SAAMI pressure limits is to blend fast-burning powder, which reaches peak pressure quickly, with slow-burning powder that maintains peak pressure longer within the same cartridge case. It should be mentioned, however, that blending powder requires meticulous quality control and pressure testing equipment to be done safely and thus should not be attempted by the average reloader.

Finally, you keep repeating that SAAMI reduced their pressure limits in 1974. I would very much like to see a pre-1974 SAAMI-published document showing these supposedly higher pressure specifications as I've been unable to find anything more than internet rumor to substantiate such a claim. My suspicion is that SAAMI revised some of their specifications when the change was made from the older CUP measurement to the newer and more accurate PSI measurement.
 
So let's compare apples to apples. Here's the listings of the BB in .357 Magnum loads. Take a look at the 158gr listings.

No - let's not...

You can't change the rules just to suit what your saying.]

How is comparing 357 and 38+P from the same manufacturer changing the rules?

Here's what you said:

"Was at the LGS/Range a few weeks back, and a relatively newish shooter was showing me his LCR and telling me that it would also shoot +P and it was almost the same as a .357 Magnum in power"

Nowhere were juiced .357mag loads mentioned - just .357mag loads, which would encompass all .357 mag loads.
Just because you can find one or two or even twenty that trounce a +P means nothing.


So you find one juiced Buffalo Bore load, and you think comparing it to a full power from the same manufacturer (still less than the original 1500 fps w/158 gr bullet) is unfair? Sorry, but that's just absurd.

All it takes is one .38spl +P load that trounces or comes close to a .357 mag load to make what the new guy said correct.
Guy makes a general statement that +P is almost a 357 Magnum... you pull up specs on one specialty manufacturer with a load that more or less approximates the old 38/44 (which was a .38 Special if you're unfamiliar with that load) yet is still a good bit shy of a full power .357 and you plant the flag of victor? Sorry... not good enough IMO. I guess you could say a hot 44 Special is almost a 44 Magnum in that case as well. Again.. laughable.

The BB loads do just that.
That +P load equals or exceeds some .357mag loads in a short barrel.

Not hardly, and the BB .357 smokes the that +P by a good 300 fps, and with a whole lot more chamber pressure. Comparing a 21000 psi load to a 35000 psi load as far as power goes is again... not even close.

The only way that argument you make holds any water at all is if you compare the BB +P to some reduced recoil, very low end magnums. I'll give you that... and I think that's being extremely generous. WHen comparing full power loads of each... or even mid range Magnums... the +P jsn't in the same ballpark.

HOWEVER - that doesn't change the fact that there are legitimate offerings out there.
The Bufflao Bore load is one.
Another is the good old FBI load - a LSWCHP +P.

True, but there are a lot more high performance .357 loads out there. I'll agree that either of the loads are good performers as far as 38 Specials go, but finding something that will outperform those two in a Magnum isn't hard at all. Again, the load you posted is pretty much equal to the old 38/44 .38 Special load

Let's also not discount the fact that the BB 38 +P loads are lead (unusual for modern defensive ammo) which due to less friction, will chrono faster than jacketed.

Now your just reaching.
That has nothing to do with anything.


No, actually it does have something to do with the two BB loads .

If BB had used a gas checked lead bullet in the Magnum load, it would have produced even higher numbers on the chronograph. Jacketed will always take more pressure to move the same size/weight projectile the same speed... and equal pressure will move the lead bullet faster than jacketed .

Someone asked how BB gets those numbers in the .38 +P. The fact is, that because it's a lead bullet, they'll get fps numbers higher than they would with a jacketed bullet of the same weight. To get those numbers with the same jacketed bullet the Magnum was pushing would likely put it well over 21000 psi.

So yes, that actually DOES have something important to do with it. Let's not even get into the fact that the load you cherry picked is a lead SWC as compared to an expanding hollowpoint in the Magnum.
 
Last edited:
Webleymkv- I constantly use the word max or maximum in describing the pressures. I never said they were minimum. No idea where you get that notion.

My reading of SAAMI specs had the 21,500 figure. Maybe they have changed it recently. They lowered it for no reason in 1974, so maybe they lowered it again. Even if it is now 20,000, +P is still at 18,500. Well below MAXIMUM allowable pressure. Again I ask, why all the hubbub about +P since it is STILL loaded well below MAXIMUM allowable pressure?

PS: On SAAMI lowering the figure. Why? Did the guns suddenly get weaker in 1974 and maybe again recently? In 1899 S&W thought 23,000 was OK for their revolvers. All the way until 1974 they thought 23,000 was OK. Then they suddenly changed it to 21,500. Now they say a gun made in the 1970s isn't "approved" for 18,500. That strikes me as crazy. Oh wait, lawyers and lawsuits. Now I get it. CYA on a corporate level.
 
Oh for the love of.....

How is comparing 357 and 38+P from the same manufacturer changing the rules?
Because - you implied that there was no .38spl +P load that was near
a .357 mag load in power from a short barreled gun like a Ruger LCR.

I found one that is & you have your panties in a wad all of a sudden.


Cherry picked?
Hell yes? Of course it is! That's what you asked for was a .38spl +P.


BB 158 grain .38spl +p load. 1112 fps -- Ruger SP 101, 3 inch barrel,


Bond Texas Defender 3" barrel - Federal 158 grain .357 magnum 1154 fps.
(from Ballistics by the inch)

I rest my case and refuse to discuss it any more
.
You're either too arrogant, pig headed or whatever to accept that there are .38spl loads that are near the same power levels as a .357 magnum from a short barrel.
 
Last edited:
Because - you implied that there was no .38spl +P load that was near
a .357 mag load in power from a short barreled gun like a Ruger LCR.

I found one that is & you have your panties in a wad all of a sudden.


Cherry picked?
Hell yes? Of course it is! That's what you asked for was a .38spl +P.


BB 158 grain .38spl +p load. 1112 fps -- Ruger SP 101, 3 inch barrel,


Bond Texas Defender 3" barrel - Federal 158 grain .357 magnum 1154 fps.
(from Ballistics by the inch)

I rest my case and refuse to discuss it any more
.
You're either too arrogant, pig headed or whatever to accept that there are .38spl loads that are near the same power levels as a .357 magnum from a short barrel. ]

Arrogant and pig headed? Panties in a wad?

We're just having a discussion/debate here.



So you found a few high perormance loads that are near a very low level magnum or a 38/44 38 Special load.

That hardly makes the case that a (speaking in general terms) 38 +p is almost as powerful as a .357 Magnum. ;)


If the guy had stated that there are a couple of high performance +P loads that get fairly close to some milder Magnum loads out of a short barrel, I wouldn't disagree. That's not what he said though.

In general terms, the two calibers aren't really that close together.
 
Last edited:
My reading of SAAMI specs had the 21,500 figure. Maybe they have changed it recently. They lowered it for no reason in 1974, so maybe they lowered it again. Even if it is now 20,000, +P is still at 18,500. Well below MAXIMUM allowable pressure. Again I ask, why all the hubbub about +P since it is STILL loaded well below MAXIMUM allowable pressure?

I've asked you several times: Would you please quote or link to a source of ANY of the pressures you're quoting?

Every place I've looked says 17,000 for standard and 20,000 for +P. Where is 18,500 coming from? Where is 21,500 coming from?

http://www.handloads.com/misc/saami.htm
http://www.chuckhawks.com/38special.htm

This article talks about .38 pressures being higher at one time:
It is important to recognize that SAAMI changed the specifications for the .38 Special in 1972. Prior to that time the standard .38 Special was very close to today's "+P" cartridges
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.38_Special
But it still sounds like standard .38 was below 20,000, not above it.

Could you please explain where your numbers come from and what they mean?
 
I don't have a dog in this fight, but my copy of the SAAMI MAP figures, dated 2004, show .38 Special at 17K and .38 Special +P at 18.5K, both Piezo measurements.

A box of +P+ states that it runs 23,500 CUP, but doesn't indicate how that measurement was taken (probably also Piezo).

Unless something magic has happened when I wasn't looking, higher velocities are the result of a) higher pressures or b) lower bullet weight.

Jim
 
So Jim's book is listing different +P limits than any source I can find. My 1998 Lyman book doesn't list any +P loads over 18,500, but it doesn't say that's the max. They mark any load above 17,000 as +P.

This inability to get a single number to agree is ridiculous.

However, different powders will allow a weight and velocity to be had at different pressures. No magic there.
 
Originally posted by SaxonPig
My reading of SAAMI specs had the 21,500 figure. Maybe they have changed it recently. They lowered it for no reason in 1974, so maybe they lowered it again. Even if it is now 20,000, +P is still at 18,500. Well below MAXIMUM allowable pressure. Again I ask, why all the hubbub about +P since it is STILL loaded well below MAXIMUM allowable pressure?

It's loaded below the maximum pressure for +P ammunition, but still above the maximum pressure for standard pressure ammunition. You have to understand, in the eyes of SAAMI .38 Special and .38 Special +P are two different cartridges even though they're dimensionally identical (much as is the case with .38 ACP and .38 Super Auto). If the ammunition is loaded above 17,000psi but below 20,000psi then it is, by definition, not a standard .38 Special but rather .38 Special +P.

Your obsession with the notion that most .38 Special +P ammunition is not loaded to the ragged edge of its pressure limit (though still above the limit for standard .38 Special) is where I get the notion that you look at SAAMI figures as minimums rather than maximums. When you describe ammo loaded to 18,000psi, which is above the SAAMI limit for standard pressure .38 Special, as, and I quote, a "mild target load" because it isn't loaded right up to whatever you believe the maximum allowable pressure is, it tends to suggest that you don't consider anything but ammunition loaded right to the ragged edge to be "real" +P ammo.

PS: On SAAMI lowering the figure. Why? Did the guns suddenly get weaker in 1974 and maybe again recently? In 1899 S&W thought 23,000 was OK for their revolvers. All the way until 1974 they thought 23,000 was OK. Then they suddenly changed it to 21,500. Now they say a gun made in the 1970s isn't "approved" for 18,500. That strikes me as crazy. Oh wait, lawyers and lawsuits. Now I get it. CYA on a corporate level.

Perhaps I wasn't clear enough in my previous post, so let me be very direct: I'm not convinced that SAAMI did actually lower their pressure limit because I've not been able to find a direct source for that claim. Please produce some documentation that SAAMI reduced their pressure limits if you wish me to take your accusation of bowing to the lawyers seriously.

Originally posted by JamesK
I don't have a dog in this fight, but my copy of the SAAMI MAP figures, dated 2004, show .38 Special at 17K and .38 Special +P at 18.5K, both Piezo measurements.

In looking into things a bit more, I did find this document on SAAMI's website dated from 1993:

http://www.saami.org/specifications_and_information/publications/download/205.pdf

On page 24, it lists the MAP for .38 Special +P cartridges at the same 18,500psi that your figures show. So, one of two things seems to be going on here: either the first document that I linked is very old (20+ years) or, as I suspect, SAAMI has increased the MAP on .38 Special +P ammunition sometime in the last ten years. Regardless, I've been unable to find any source which lists a MAP above 17,000psi for standard pressure .38 Special ammunition so the 18,000psi ammo that SaxonPig mentions is still, by definition, +P.

A box of +P+ states that it runs 23,500 CUP, but doesn't indicate how that measurement was taken (probably also Piezo).

Unless something magic has happened when I wasn't looking, higher velocities are the result of a) higher pressures or b) lower bullet weight.

The problem here is that your +P+ ammo has its pressure listed in CUP rather than PSI and the two measurements are quite different. It is unfortunate that the industry cannot seem to standardize on one unit of measurement or the other since there is no direct conversion between PSI and CUP. Because of this, about the only comparison that we can make with your +P+ ammo is that its MAP is somewhere in excess of the SAAMI MAP for .38 Special +P, be it 18,500psi or 20,000psi. However, because the +P+ designation is not recognized by SAAMI (or CIP for that matter) we really have no way of knowing exactly how far above +P MAP it is.

Also, while pressure and velocity do not directly correlate, that does not mean that they are completely unrelated. Indeed the goal of loading ammunition to higher pressure is to achieve higher velocity for a given bullet since there is really no other good reason to increase pressure. That being said, one cannot predict the velocity of a given bullet based solely on its peak pressure.

For example, Winchester lists their standard pressure .38 Spl 158gr LSWC at 755fps and their .38 Spl +P LSWCHP at 890fps, a velocity increase of roughly 18%. However, their standard pressure .38 Spl 125gr JSP is listed at 775fps while their .38 Spl +P 125gr JHP is listed at 945fps, a velocity increase of roughly 22%. Given that it is probably a safe assumption that Winchester loads all of their ammunition to approximately the same "safety margin" below the maximum allowable pressure, we can conclude that both standard pressure loadings are probably operating at about the same peak pressure while both +P loadings are probably operating at about the same pressure increase, yet the velocity increases are not the same.

The point in all of this is that while increasing pressure will most likely yield some velocity increase if all other factors are unchanged, you cannot accurately measure the increase in pressure by comparing the increase in velocity or vice-versa. Sometimes, a relatively small increase in pressure may produce a large increase in velocity and other times a rather large increase in pressure may produce a comparatively small velocity increase. The reason that this is pertinent to the discussion at hand is because SaxonPig seems to assume that, because the velocity of .38 Spl +P ammo is unimpressive (at least in his opinion), the pressures must therefore also be unimpressive and thus will not cause significantly increased wear to a vintage gun. This is, of course, an erroneous and potentially dangerous assumption.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top