Ruger 22/45 is junk

My 22/45 has been outanding. My granddaughter is just thrilled to shoot it. She got addicted when she shot an EXACT center on a bullseye target. The pistol suffers from the same disassemnly/reassembly properties going back to the earliest ones of the 1950s. You just have to get used to being careful and watching where the mainsprint strut goes. I would be happy to receive ANY Ruige I, II, III, or 22/45.
Willr
 
In 60+yrs. of this love affair with firearms,I've learned one thing.Some guns and owners are not compatible and should part company. :D
 
I agree with Skeets!

Ruger MK series, including the 22/45 variants don't deserve a bashing like this thread started with!
 
I was interested in them when they came out...

I handled a few in the stores, non of the mags would drop free.
Not that big of a deal, and it could probably be an easy fix after looking into it, but after noticing that I just kinda lost interest.

I'm a Mark II kinda guy:D

Funny, because the Mark II is not exactly a drop free design! HAH:)
 
PHP:
Several shooters at the range I use swear that their Rugers are the bomb, but a hassle to clean. My Buckmark is great, but a hassle to clean. My Buckmark will shoot most any ammo I feed it these days. That was not the situation when it was new. It would jam, misfire, and not cycle completely for the first few hundred rounds with some ammo.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top